Advertisement

Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 299–325 | Cite as

Analysing the relationship between the problem-solving-related beliefs, competence and teaching of three Cypriot primary teachers

  • Paul Andrews
  • Constantinos XenofontosEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this article, we analyse the problem-solving-related beliefs, competence and classroom practice of three Cypriot upper-primary teachers. Data derived from semi-structured interviews focused on teachers’ beliefs about the nature of mathematical problems, problem-solving, and their competence as both problem-solvers and teachers of problem-solving; clinical interviews during which teachers solved a context-free geometrical problem, and observations of a lesson during which teachers introduced that problem to students of grade six. Analyses, structured by a framework derived from key problem-solving literature, indicated firstly, that the framework was an effective tool, sensitive to variation within and across the data from teachers, and secondly, that all participants, in largely explicable ways, exhibited consistency and inconsistency in the ways in which their beliefs, competence and practice interacted. Some implications for further research are discussed.

Keywords

Problem-solving Teachers Beliefs Competence Practices Cyprus 

References

  1. Abelson, R. (1986). Beliefs are like possessions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 16(3), 223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J., Sullivan, P., & White, P. (2005). Using a schematic model to represent influences on, and relationships between, teachers’ problem-solving beliefs and practices. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(2), 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, P. (2007). The curricular importance of mathematics: A comparison of English and Hungarian teachers' espoused beliefs. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(3), 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrews, P. (2011). The cultural location of teachers’ mathematical knowledge: Another hidden variable in mathematics education research? In T. Rowland & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 99–118). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrews, P., Ryve, A., Hemmi, K., & Sayers, J. (2014). PISA, TIMSS and Finnish mathematics teaching: An enigma in search of an explanation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(1), 7–26.  CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Antonietti, A., Ignazi, S., & Perego, P. (2000). Metacognitive knowledge about problem-solving methods. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arcavi, A., & Friedlander, A. (2007). Curriculum developers and problem solving: The case of Israeli elementary school projects. ZDM, 39(5), 355–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernardo, A. (2001). Analogical problem construction and transfer in mathematical problem solving. Educational Psychology, 21(2), 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling, applications, and links to other subjects-state, trends and issues in mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Briars, D., & Larkin, J. (1984). An integrated model of skill in solving elementary word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 245–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cai, J., & Lester, F. (2005). Solution and pedagogical representations in Chinese and U.S. mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3–4), 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cai, J., & Nie, B. (2007). Problem solving in Chinese mathematics education: Research and practice. ZDM, 39(6), 459–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Callejo, M., & Vila, A. (2009). Approach to mathematical problem solving and students’ belief systems: Two case studies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(1), 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell, R., & Kyriakides, L. (2000). The national curriculum and standards in primary schools: A comparative perspective. Comparative Education, 36(4), 383–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carlson, M., & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(1), 45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chapman, O. (1997). Metaphors in the teaching of mathematical problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32(3), 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chapman, O. (2006). Classroom practices for context of mathematics word problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(2), 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Charalambous, C., & Philippou, G. (2010). Teachers’ concerns and efficacy beliefs about implementing a mathematics curriculum reform: Integrating two lines of inquiry. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2011). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. In A. Sfard, K. Gravemeijer, & E. Yackel (Eds.), A journey in mathematics education research (pp. 117–163). Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Cohen, D. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Collins, A. (1996). Design issues for learning environments. In S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte, R. Glaser, & H. Mandl (Eds.), International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments (pp. 347–362). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Cooney, T. (1985). A beginning teacher’s view of problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(5), 324–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crespo, S., & Sinclair, N. (2008). What makes a problem mathematically interesting? inviting prospective teachers to pose better problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(5), 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cuoco, A., Goldenberg, E., & Mark, J. (1996). Habits of mind: An organizing principle for mathematics curricula. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(4), 375–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. De Corte, E. (1995). Fostering cognitive growth: A perspective from research on mathematics learning and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 30(1), 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. De Corte, E. (2004). Mainstreams and perspectives in research on learning (mathematics) from instruction. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(2), 279–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Depaepe, F. (2008). Unraveling the relationship between students’ mathematic-related beliefs and the classroom culture. European Psychologist, 13(1), 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Op’t Eynde, P. (2000). Self-regulation: A characteristic and a goal of mathematics learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 687–726). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Depaepe, F., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Teachers’ approaches towards word problem solving: Elaborating or restricting the problem context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 152–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Drake, C. (2002). Experience counts: Career stage and teachers’ responses to mathematics education reform. Educational Policy, 16(2), 311–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ford, M. (1994). Teachers’ beliefs about mathematical problem solving in the elementary school. School Science and Mathematics, 94(6), 314–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Frykholm, J. (1999). The impact of reform: Challenges for mathematics teacher preparation. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(1), 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Garofalo, J., & Lester, F. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goldin, G. A. (2002). Affect, meta-affect, and mathematical belief structures. In: G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: a hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 59–72). Dordrecht Kluwer.Google Scholar
  36. Guberman, R., & Leikin, R. (2013). Interesting and difficult mathematical problems: changing teacher’ views by employing multiple-solution tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(1), 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Handal, B., & Herrington, A. (2003). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and curriculum reform. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(1), 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Haylock, D., & Cockburn, A. (2008). Understanding mathematics for young children. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Higgins, K. (1997). The effect of year-long instruction in mathematical problem solving on middle-school students’ attitudes, beliefs, and abilities. The Journal of Experimental Education, 66(1), 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jitendra, A., Griffin, C., Deatline-Buchman, A., & Sczesniak, E. (2007). Mathematical word problem solving in third-grade classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kapa, E. (2001). A metacognitive support during the process of problem solving in a computerized environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(3), 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Karp, A. (2010). Analyzing and attempting to overcome prospective teachers’ difficulties during problem-solving instruction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(2), 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kelly, C. (2006). Using manipulatives in mathematical problem solving: A performance-based analysis. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, Monograph, 3(2), 184–193.Google Scholar
  44. Kyriakides, L., Charalambous, C., Philippou, G., & Campbell, R. (2006). Illuminating reform evaluation studies through incorporating teacher effectiveness research: A case study in mathematics. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(1), 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Leatham, K. (2006). Viewing mathematics teachers’ beliefs as sensible systems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(1), 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Leder, G., & Forgasz, H. (2002). Measuring mathematical beliefs and their impact on the learning of mathematics: A new approach. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education (pp. 95–113). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leikin, R. (2003). Problem-solving preferences of mathematics teachers: Focusing on symmetry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(4), 297–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Leikin, R., & Kawass, S. (2005). Planning teaching an unfamiliar mathematics problem: the role of teachers’ experience in solving the problem and watching pupils solving it. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3–4), 253–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Leikin, R., & Levav-Waynberg, A. (2007). Exploring mathematics teacher knowledge to explain the gap between theory-based recommendations and school practice in the use of connecting tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(3), 349–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mason, J. (2004). Are beliefs believable? Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(3), 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (1982). Thinking mathematically. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  52. Metallidou, P. (2009). Pre-service and in-service teachers’ metacognitive knowledge about problem-solving strategies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nesher, P., Hershkovitz, S., & Novotna, J. (2003). Situation model, text base and what else? factors affecting problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(2), 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nunokawa, K. (1994). Solver’s structures of a problem situation and their global restructuring. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13(3), 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nunokawa, K. (2005). Mathematical problem solving and learning mathematics: What we expect students to obtain. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3–4), 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Op’t Eynde, P., De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L. (2002). Framing students’ mathematics-related beliefs: A quest for conceptual clarity and a comprehensive categorization. In: G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: a hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 13–37). Dordrecht Kluwer.Google Scholar
  57. Osana, H., Lacroix, G., Tucker, B., & Desrosiers, C. (2006). The role of content knowledge and problem features on preservice teachers’ appraisal of elementary mathematics tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(4), 347–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Raymond, A. (1997). Inconsistency between a beginning elementary school teacher’s mathematics beliefs and teaching practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 550–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102–119). New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  62. Rowland, T., & Zazkis, R. (2013). Contingency in the mathematics classroom: Opportunities taken and opportunities missed. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(2), 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ryve, A. (2007). What is actually discussed in problem-solving courses for prospective teachers? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(1), 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ryve, A., Hemmi, K., & Börjesson, M. (2011). Discourses about school-based mathematics teacher education in Finland and Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(2), 132–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schoenfeld, A. (1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Belief systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance. Cognitive Science, 7(4), 329–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schoenfeld, A. (1985a). Metacognitive and epistemological issues in mathematical understanding. In E. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  67. Schoenfeld, A. (1985b). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  68. Schoenfeld, A. (1988). When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of ‘well-taught’ mathematics courses. Educational Psychologist, 23(2), 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem-solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  70. Schoenfeld, A. (2004). The math wars. Educational Policy, 18(1), 253–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schoenfeld, A. (2007). Problem solving in the United States, 1970–2008: Research and theory, practice and politics. ZDM, 39(5), 537–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schoenfeld, A. (2010a). How and why do teachers explain things the way they do? In M. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.), Instructional explanations in the disciplines (pp. 83–106). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schoenfeld, A. (2010b). How we think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  74. Schoenfeld, A. (2012). Problematizing the didactic triangle. ZDM, 44(5), 587–599.Google Scholar
  75. Silver, E. (1985). Research on teaching mathematical problem solving: Some under-represented themes and needed directions. In E. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  76. Silver, E., Ghousseini, H., Gosen, D., Charalambous, C., & Strawhun, B. (2005). Moving from rhetoric to praxis: Issues faced by teachers in having students consider multiple solutions for problems in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3–4), 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Skott, J. (2009). Contextualising the notion of ‘belief enactment’. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(1), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Skott, J. (2013). Understanding the role of the teacher in emerging classroom practices: Searching for patterns of participation. ZDM, 45(4), 547–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Snow, R. E., Corno, L., & Jackson, D. (1996). Individual differences in affective and conative functions. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook on educational psychology. New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar
  80. Stake, R. (2002). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435–454). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  81. Stein, M., & Kaufman, J. (2010). Selecting and supporting the use of mathematics curricula at scale. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 663–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Strauss, S., Ravid, D., Magen, N., & Berliner, D. C. (1998). Relations between teachers’ subject matter knowledge, teaching experience and their mental models of children’s minds and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(6), 579–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Taplin, M., & Chan, C. (2001). Developing problem-solving practitioners. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(4), 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Thompson, A. G. (1984). The relationship of teachers conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(2), 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Törner, G. (2002). Mathematical beliefs—A search for a common ground: Some theoretical considerations on structuring beliefs, some research questions, and some phenomenological observations. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 73–94). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  86. Verschaffel, L., Luwel, K., Torbeyns, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2009). Conceptualizing, investigating, and enhancing adaptive expertise in elementary mathematics education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(3), 335–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Watson, A., & Barton, B. (2011). Teaching mathematics as the contextual application of mathematical modes of enquiry. In T. Rowland & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 65–82). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wilkins, J. (2008). The relationship among elementary teachers’ content knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Xenofontos, C., & Andrews, P. (2012). Prospective teachers’ beliefs about problem-solving: Cypriot and English cultural constructions. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(1), 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Xenofontos, C., & Andrews, P. (2014). Defining mathematical problems and problem solving: Prospective primary teachers' beliefs in Cyprus and England. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(2), 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of StockholmStockholmSweden
  2. 2.University of NicosiaNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations