Advertisement

Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 79–99 | Cite as

What are they asking? An analysis of the questions planned by prospective teachers when integrating literature in mathematics

  • Barbara Purdum-Cassidy
  • Suzanne Nesmith
  • Rachelle D. Meyer
  • Sandi Cooper
Article

Abstract

Questioning is considered a powerful tool in mediating students’ knowledge construction and conceptual understanding. In this qualitative study, the mathematics-focused lesson plans of elementary education prospective teachers provided data to determine the ways that the approach of literature integration in mathematics influenced prospective teachers’ planned questions. All prospective teachers were required to incorporate children’s literature within the mathematics lessons they planned and presented during a field-based teaching experience. Analysis revealed variances in the numbers, types, and foci of prospective teachers’ planned questions. These findings allow speculation that the utilization of mathematics literature integration allowed many of the prospective teachers to create reform-oriented, constructivist mathematics-focused questions and experiences for their students.

Keywords

Teacher education Mathematics instruction Questioning Field-based experience 

References

  1. Adams, T. L. (2003). Reading mathematics: More than words can say. Reading Teacher, 56(8), 786–795.Google Scholar
  2. Amit, M., & Fried, M. N. (2002). Research, reform, and times of change. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 355–381). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Andre, T. (1979). Does answering higher-level questions while reading facilitate productive learning? Review of Educational Research, 49, 280–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Axelrod, A. (1996). Pigs on a blanket. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar
  5. Baird, J. R., & Northfield, J. R. (Eds.). (1992). Learning from the PEEL experience. Melbourne: Monash University Printing.Google Scholar
  6. Battista, M. (1994). Teacher beliefs and the reform movement in mathematics education. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 462–463.Google Scholar
  7. Bentz, W. P., & Moore, S. D. (2003). Using literature to teach factorials. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 8(9), 461–465.Google Scholar
  8. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. (Handbook I: Cognitive domain). New York, NY: David McKay Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Blosser, P. E. (1973). Handbook of effective questioning techniques. Worthington, OH: Education Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Blosser, P. E. (2000). How to ask the right questions. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.Google Scholar
  11. Boaler, J. (1998). Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understanding. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boaler, J., & Brodie, K. (2004). The importance of depth and breadth in the analyses of teaching: A framework for analyzing teacher questions. Proceedings of the 26th meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  13. Borich, G. (1992). Effective teaching methods (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Merrill.Google Scholar
  14. Brandy, T. (1999). So what? Teaching children what matters in math. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  15. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  16. Burns, M. (1994). The greedy triangle. New York, NY: Scholastic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Burns, M. (1997). Spaghetti and meatballs for all. New York, NY: Scholastic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Buschman, L. (2001). Using student interviews to guide classroom instruction: An action research project. Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(4), 222–227.Google Scholar
  19. Cambourne, B. (2001). Conditions for literacy learning: Why do some students fail to learn to read? Ockham’s razor and the conditions of learning. The Reading Teacher, 54(8), 784–786.Google Scholar
  20. Cazden, C. B. (1986). Classroom discourse. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 432–463). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  22. Cerdan, R., Vidal-Abarca, E., Martinez, T., Gilabert, R., & Gil, L. (2009). Impact of question–answering tasks on search processes and reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 19, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cleary, B. P. (2008). On the scale—A weighty tale. Minneapolis, MN: Millbrook Press.Google Scholar
  24. Clement, R. (1991). Counting on Frank. Milwaukee WI: Gareth Stevens.Google Scholar
  25. Crespo, S. (2003). Learning to pose mathematical problems: Exploring changes in preservice teachers’ practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 243–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Doyle, W. (1985). Classroom organization and management. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 392–431). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Draper, R. J. (2002). School mathematics reform, constructivism, and literacy: A case for literacy instruction in the reform-oriented math classroom. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 45(6), 520–529.Google Scholar
  28. Ducolon, C. K. (2000). Quality literature as a springboard to problem solving. Teaching Children Mathematics, 6(7), 442–446. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/i40051648.
  29. Elia, I., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Georgiou, A. (2010). The role of pictures in picture books on children’s cognitive engagement with mathematics. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 18(3), 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Franke, M. L., Webb, N. M., Chan, A. G., Ing, M., Freund, D., & Battey, D. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students’ mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(4), 380–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Freeman, E. B., & Person, D. G. (1998). Connecting informational children’s books with content area learning. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  32. Gall, M. (1984). Synthesis of research on teachers’ questioning. Educational Leadership, 42, 40–47.Google Scholar
  33. Gall, M., Dunning, B., & Weathersby, R. (1971). Minicourse nine: Higher cognitive questioning, teachers handbook. Beverly Hills, CA: Macmillan Educational Services.Google Scholar
  34. Gallagher, J. J. (1965). Productive thinking of gifted children. U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, Cooperative Research Project, No 965. Urbana, UL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  35. Graesser, A. C., & Person, M. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grossier, P. (1964). How to use the fine art of questions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  37. Hamilton, R. J. (1985). A framework for the evaluation of the effectiveness of adjunct questions and objectives. Review of Educational Research, 55, 47–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hannel, I. (2009). Insufficient questioning. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(3), 65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Haury, D. L. (2001). Literature-based mathematics in elementary school. Retrieved May 15, 2006 from Ohio State University, Eric Digest Web site: http://www.ericse.org.
  40. Henning, J. E., & Lockhart, A. (2003). Acquiring the art of classroom discourse: A comparison of teacher and prospective teacher talk in a fifth grade classroom. Research for Educational Reform, 8(3), 46–57.Google Scholar
  41. Herber, H. L. (1978). Teaching reading in the content areas. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Hiebert, J. (2003). What research says about the NCTM standards. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 1–23). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Inc.Google Scholar
  43. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givving, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  44. Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1993). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and students’ learning in second-grade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 393–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hutchins, P. (1986). The doorbell rang. New York, NY: Greenwillow Books.Google Scholar
  46. Kawanaka, T., Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). Studying mathematics classrooms in Germany, Japan, and the United States: Lessons from TIMSS videotape study. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna, & I. Huntley (Eds.), International comparisons in mathematics education (pp. 86–203). Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  47. Kazemi, E., & Stipek, D. (2001). Promoting conceptual thinking in four upper-elementary mathematics classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 102, 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Keat, J. B., & Wilburne, J. M. (2009). The impact of storybooks on kindergarten children’s mathematical achievement and approaches to learning. US-China Education Review, 6(7), 61–67.Google Scholar
  49. Klinzing, H. G., Klinzing-Eurich, G., & Tisher, R. P. (1985). Higher cognitive behaviors in classroom discourse: Congruencies between teachers’ questions and pupils’ responses. The Australian Journal of Education, 29(1), 63–75.Google Scholar
  50. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  51. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Lorber, M. (1996). Objectives, methods, and evaluation for secondary teaching (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  53. Manouchehri, A., & Lapp, D. A. (2003). Unveiling student understanding: The role of questioning in instruction. Mathematics Teacher, 96(8), 562–566.Google Scholar
  54. Martino, A. M., & Maher, C. A. (1999). Teacher questioning to promote justification and generalization in mathematics: What research practice has taught us. Journal of Mathematics Behavior, 18, 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mehan, H. (1985). The structure of classroom discourse. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 3, pp. 119–131). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  56. Mewborn, D. S., & Huberty, P. D. (1999). Questioning your way to the standards. Teaching Children Mathematics, 6(4), 226–227.Google Scholar
  57. Moyer, P. S. (2000). Communicating mathematically: Children’s literature as a natural connection. The Reading Teacher, 54(3), 246–256.Google Scholar
  58. Moyer, P. S., & Milewicz, E. (2002). Learning to question: Categories of questioning used by preservice teachers during diagnostic mathematics interviews. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Murphy, S. J. (1997). Divide and ride. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  60. Murphy, S. J. (1998a). Lemonade for sale. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  61. Murphy, S. J. (1998b). The penny pot. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  62. Murphy, S. J. (1999). Learning math through stories. School Library Journal, 45(3), 122–124.Google Scholar
  63. Murphy, S. J. (2003). Coyotes all around. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  64. Napell, S. M. (2001). Using questions to enhance classroom learning. Education, 99(2), 188–197.Google Scholar
  65. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  66. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success. Jessup, MD: United States Department of Education.Google Scholar
  67. National Research Council. (2001). The state of school mathematics in the United States, Chapter 2. In J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford & B. Findell (Eds.), Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics (pp. 31–70). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  68. Newschwander, C. (1997). Sir Cumference and the first round table: A math adventure. Watertown, MA: Charlesbridge.Google Scholar
  69. Nicol, C. (1999). Learning to teach mathematics: Questioning, listening and responding. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37, 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nilssen, V., Gudmundsdottir, S., & Wangsmo-Cappelen, V. (1995). Unexpected answers: Case study of a student teacher derailing in a math lesson. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  71. Ong, E. G., Lim, C. S., & Ghazali, M. (2010). Examining the changes in novice and experienced mathematics teachers’ questioning techniques through the lesson study process. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 33(1), 86–109.Google Scholar
  72. Parker, M., & Hurry, J. (2007). Teachers’ use of questioning and modeling comprehension skills in primary classrooms. Educational Review, 59(3), 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  74. Perry, M., VanderStoep, S. W., & Yu, S. L. (1993). Asking questions in first-grade mathematics classes: Potential influences on mathematical thought. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Pinczes, E. (1993). One hundred hungry ants. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  76. Ralph, E. G. (1999a). Developing novice teachers’ oral-questioning skills. McGill Journal of Education, 34(1), 29–47.Google Scholar
  77. Ralph, E. G. (1999b). Oral-questioning skills of novice teachers: Any questions? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 26(4), 286–296.Google Scholar
  78. Sanders, N. M. (1966). Questions: What kinds?. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  79. Smith, R. (1969). Questions for teachers: Creative reading. The Reading Teacher, 22(5), 430–434.Google Scholar
  80. Smith, M. S. (2000). Balancing old and new: An experienced middle school teacher’s learning in the context of mathematics instructional reform. Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 351–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Smith, P. S., Banilower, E., McMahon, K., & Weiss, I. (2002). The national survey of science and mathematics education: Trends from 1977 to 2000. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc. Retrieved from http://2000survey.horizon-research.com/reports/trends/trends_report.pdf.
  82. Smith, E. L., Blakeslee, T. D., & Anderson, C. W. (1993). Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change learning in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 10, 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. J. Lester Jr (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319–369). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  84. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  85. Teitel, L. (2003). The professional development schools handbook: Starting, sustaining, and assessing partnerships that improve student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press Inc.Google Scholar
  86. Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2010). Elementary and middle school mathematics. Teaching developmentally (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
  87. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., van den Boogaard, S., & Doig, B. (2008). Picture books as an impetus for kindergarteners’ mathematical thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 341–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Van Garderen, D. (2004). Reciprocal teaching as a comprehension strategy for understanding mathematical word problems. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 20, 225–229. doi: 10.1080/10573560490272702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Vogler, K. E. (2005). Improve your verbal questioning. The Clearing House, 79(2), 98–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Walsh, J. A., & Sattes, B. D. (2011). Thinking through quality questioning: Deepening student engagement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  92. Wasserman, S. (1991). The art of the question. Childhood Education, 67(4), 257–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Watson, K., & Young, B. (2003). Discourse for learning in the classroom. In S. Murphy & C. Dudley-Marling (Eds.), Literacy through language arts: Teaching and learning in context (pp. 39–49). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  94. Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Ing, M. (2006). Small-group reflections: Parallels between teacher discourse and student behavior in peer-directed groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 63–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Welchman-Tischler, R. (1992). How to use children’s literature to teach mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Inc.Google Scholar
  96. White, D. Y. (2000). Reaching all students mathematically through questioning. In M. Strutchens, M. L. Johnson, & W. F. Tate (Eds.), Changing the faces of mathematics: Perspectives on African Americans (pp. 21–32). Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  97. White, D. Y. (2003). Promoting productive mathematical classroom discourse with diverse students. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(1), 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Whitin, D. (1992). Explore mathematics through children’s literature. School Library Journal, 38(8), 24–28.Google Scholar
  99. Whitin, D. J., & Whitin, P. E. (2004). New visions for linking literature and mathematics. Urbana, IL: The National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  100. Wilen, W. W. (2001). Exploring myths about teacher questioning in the social studies classroom. The Social Studies, 92(1), 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wood, T. (2002). What does it mean to teach differently? In B. Barton, K. Irwin, M. Pfannuch & M. Thomas (Eds.), Mathematics education in the South Pacific: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 61–67). Auckland, New Zealand: MERGA.Google Scholar
  102. Yopp, R. H., & Yopp, H. K. (2001). Literature-based reading activities (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  103. Young, E., & Marroquin, C. (2006). Posing problems from children’s literature. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(7), 362–366.Google Scholar
  104. Zambo, R. (2005). The power of two: Linking mathematics and literature. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 10(8), 394–399.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Purdum-Cassidy
    • 1
  • Suzanne Nesmith
    • 1
  • Rachelle D. Meyer
    • 1
  • Sandi Cooper
    • 1
  1. 1.Baylor UniversityWacoUSA

Personalised recommendations