Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 5–36 | Cite as

Mathematics teachers’ learning: a conceptual framework and synthesis of research

  • Lynn T. Goldsmith
  • Helen M. Doerr
  • Catherine C. Lewis
Article

Abstract

How do practicing mathematics teachers continue to develop the knowledge and habits of mind that enable them to teach well and to improve their teaching over time? The question of how (and what) teachers learn lies at the crux of any effort to provide high-quality mathematics teaching for all students. This article reviews 106 articles written between 1985 and 2008 related to the professional learning of practicing teachers of mathematics. We offer a synthesis of this research, guided by Clarke and Hollingsworth’s (Teach Teach Educ 18(8):947–967, 2002) dynamic model of teacher growth. Their model emphasizes the recursive nature of teachers’ learning and suggests that growth in one aspect of teachers’ knowledge and practice may promote subsequent growth in other areas. We report the results in six major areas of teacher learning, identify several crosscutting themes in the literature, and make recommendations for future research aimed at understanding teachers’ professional learning.

Keywords

Professional development Mathematics Teacher learning In-service teachers 

References

  1. Anderson, C. R., & Hoffmeister, A. M. (2007). Knowing and teaching middle school mathematics: A professional development course for in-service teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 107(5), 193–203.Google Scholar
  2. Arbaugh, F. (2003). Study groups as a form of professional development for secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(2), 139–163.Google Scholar
  3. Balfanz, R., Mac Iver, D. J., & Byrnes, V. (2006). The implementation and impact of evidence-based mathematics reforms in high-poverty middle schools: A multi-site, multi-year study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(1), 33–64.Google Scholar
  4. Barrett, J., Jones, G., Mooney, E., Thornton, C., Cady, J., Guinee, P., et al. (2002). Working with novice teachers: Challenges for professional development. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 4, 15–27.Google Scholar
  5. Borko, H., Davinroy, K. H., Bliem, C. L., & Cumbo, K. B. (2000). Exploring and supporting teacher change: Two third-grade teachers' experiences in a mathematics and literacy staff development project. Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 273–306. Google Scholar
  6. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417–436.Google Scholar
  7. Borko, H., Mayfield, V., Marion, S., Flexer, R., & Cumbo, K. (1997). Teachers’ developing ideas and practices about mathematics performance assessment: Successes, stumbling blocks, and implications for professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(3), 259–278.Google Scholar
  8. Boylan, M. (2010). “It’s getting me thinking and I’m an old cynic”: Exploring the relational dynamics of mathematics teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 383–395.Google Scholar
  9. Boyle, B., Lamprianou, I., & Boyle, T. (2005). A longitudinal study of teacher change: What makes professional development effective? Report of the second year of the study. School Effectiveness And School Improvement, 16(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
  10. Brickell, H. M. (2011). Needed: Instruments as good as our eyes. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Education, 7(15), 171–179. Originally published in 1976 in the Journal of Career Education, 2(3), 56–66.Google Scholar
  11. Bright, G. W., & Prokosch, N. E. (1995). Middle school mathematics teachers learning to teach with calculators and computers, part II: Teacher change. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 338–344.Google Scholar
  12. Britt, M. S., Irwin, K. C., & Ritchie, G. (2001). Professional conversations and professional growth. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(1), 29–53.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, C. A., Stein, M. K., & Forman, E. A. (1996). Assisting teachers and students to reform the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(1–2), 63–93.Google Scholar
  14. Bryk, A. S. (2009). Support a science of improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(8), 597–600.Google Scholar
  15. Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., & Grunow, A. (2010). Getting ideas into action: Building networked improvement communities in education. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Stanford, CA, essay, retrieved September 15, 2011 from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/spotlight/webinar-bryk-gomez-building-networked-improvement-communities-in-education.
  16. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C.-P., & Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 499–532.Google Scholar
  17. Chaney-Cullen, T., & Duffy, T. M. (1999). Strategic teaching framework: Multimedia to support teacher change. Journal of The Learning Sciences, 8(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
  18. Chapin, S. (1994). Implementing reform in school mathematics. Journal of Education, 176(1), 67–76.Google Scholar
  19. Chapman, O. (1999). Inservice teacher development in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 121–142.Google Scholar
  20. Chapman, O., & Heater, B. (2010). Understanding change through a high school mathematics teacher’s journey to inquiry-based teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 445–458.Google Scholar
  21. Chazan, D., Ben-Chaim, D., & Gormas, J. (1998). Shared teaching assignments in the service of mathematics reform: Situated professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(7), 687–702.Google Scholar
  22. Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967.Google Scholar
  23. Cohen, D. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 311–329.Google Scholar
  24. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294–343.Google Scholar
  25. Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers’ learning. The Elementary School Journal, 103(3), 287–311.Google Scholar
  26. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). http://www.corestandards.org.
  27. Confrey, J., Castro, J., & Wilhelm, J. (2000). Implementation research as a means to link systemic reform and applied psychology in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 179–191.Google Scholar
  28. Crockett, M. D. (2002). Inquiry as professional development: Creating dilemmas through teachers’ work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(5), 609–624.Google Scholar
  29. Cwikla, J. (2007). The trials of a poor middle school trying to catch up in mathematics teachers’ multiple communities of practice and the boundary encounters. Education and Urban Society, 39(4), 554–583.Google Scholar
  30. Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2003). Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education and complexity science. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 137–167.Google Scholar
  31. Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2006). Mathematics-for-teaching: An ongoing investigation of the mathematics that teachers (need to) know. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 293–319.Google Scholar
  32. Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112.Google Scholar
  33. Desimone, L. M., Smith, T. M., & Phillips, K. J. R. (2007). Does policy influence mathematics and science teachers’ participation in professional development? Teachers College Record, 109(5), 1086–1122.Google Scholar
  34. Doerr, H. M., & English, L. D. (2006). Middle grade teachers’ learning through students’ engagement with modeling tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(1), 5–32.Google Scholar
  35. Drake, C., Spillane, J., & Hufferd-Ackles, K. (2001). Storied identities: Teacher learning and subject-matter context. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  36. Edwards, T. G. (1996). Implications of a model for conceptualizing change in mathematics teachers’ instructional practices. Action in Teacher Education, 18(2), 19–30.Google Scholar
  37. Edwards, T. G., & Hensien, S. M. (1999). Changing instructional practice through action research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(2), 187–206.Google Scholar
  38. Elliott, R., Kazemi, E., Lesseig, K., Mumme, J., Carroll, C., & Kelley-Petersen, M. (2009). Conceptualizing the work of leading mathematical tasks in professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(4), 364–379.Google Scholar
  39. Etchberger, M. L., & Shaw, K. L. (1992). Teacher change as a progression of transitional images: A chronology of a developing constructivist teacher. School Science and Mathematics, 92(8), 411–417.Google Scholar
  40. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. R., & Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 403–434.Google Scholar
  41. Fernandez, C. (2005). Lesson study: A means for elementary teachers to develop the knowledge of mathematics needed for reform-minded teaching? Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(4), 265–289.Google Scholar
  42. Fisler, J. L., & Firestone, W. A. (2006). Teacher learning in a school-university partnership: Exploring the role of social trust and teaching efficacy beliefs. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1155–1185.Google Scholar
  43. Franke, M., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Ansell, E., & Behrend, J. (1998). Understanding teachers’ self-sustaining, generative change in the context of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 67–80.Google Scholar
  44. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.Google Scholar
  45. Gearhart, M., & Saxe, G. B. (2004). When teachers know what students know: Integrating mathematics assessment. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 304–313.Google Scholar
  46. Gearhart, M., Saxe, G. B., Seltzer, M., Schlackman, J., Ching, C., Nasir, N., et al. (1999). Opportunities to learn fractions in elementary mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(3), 286–315.Google Scholar
  47. Glazer, E. (2004). From a caterpillar to a butterfly: The growth of a teacher in developing technology-enhanced mathematical investigations. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), 115–138.Google Scholar
  48. Goldsmith, L. T., Doerr, H. M., & Lewis, C. (2009). Opening the black box of teacher learning: Shifts in attention. In Tzekaki, M., Kaldrimidou, M., & Sakonidis, C. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 33rd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 97–104). Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.Google Scholar
  49. Goldsmith, L. T., & Schifter, D. (1997). Understanding teachers in transition: Characteristics of a model for the development of mathematics teaching. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 19–54). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. Goldsmith, L. T., & Seago, N. (2008). Using video cases to unpack the mathematics in students’ mathematical thinking. In M. S. Smith (Ed.), Monographs of the association of mathematics teacher educators, Vol. 4 (pp. 133–145). San Diego, CA: Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.Google Scholar
  51. Grandau, L. (2005). Learning from self-study: Gaining knowledge about how fourth graders move from relational description to algebraic generalization. Harvard Educational Review, 75(2), 202–221.Google Scholar
  52. Grant, S. G., Peterson, P. L., & Shojgreen-Downer, A. (1996). Learning to teach mathematics in the context of systemic reform. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 509–541.Google Scholar
  53. Graven, M. (2004). Investigating mathematics teacher learning within an in-service community of practice: The centrality of confidence. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(2), 177–211.Google Scholar
  54. Groth, R. E. (2007). Case studies of mathematics teachers’ learning in an online study group. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(1), 490–520.Google Scholar
  55. Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12.Google Scholar
  56. Halai, A. (1998). Mentor, mentee, and mathematics: A story of professional development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 295–315.Google Scholar
  57. Heck, D. J., Banilower, E. R., Weiss, I. R., & Rosenberg, S. L. (2008). Studying the effects of professional development: The case of the NSF’s local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(2), 113–152.Google Scholar
  58. Hill, H. C., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330–351.Google Scholar
  59. Hill, H. C., Blunk, M., Charalambous, C., Lewis, J., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., et al. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511.Google Scholar
  60. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.Google Scholar
  61. Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 11–30.Google Scholar
  62. Hodgen, J., & Askew, M. (2007). Emotion, identity and teacher learning: Becoming a primary mathematics teacher. Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 469–487.Google Scholar
  63. Horn, I. S. (2005). Learning on the job: A situated account of teacher learning in high school mathematics departments. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 207–236.Google Scholar
  64. Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes and efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(10). Retrieved May 22, 2011 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n10/.
  65. Izsak, A., & Sherin, M. G. (2003). Exploring the use of new representations as a resource for teacher learning. School Science and Mathematics, 103(1), 18–27.Google Scholar
  66. Jaberg, P., Lubinski, C., & Yazujian, T. (2002). One teacher’s journey to change her mathematics teaching. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 4, 3–14.Google Scholar
  67. Jacobs, V. R., Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Battey, D. (2007). Professional development focused on children’s algebraic reasoning in elementary school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 258–288.Google Scholar
  68. Jacobson, C., & Lehrer, R. (2000). Teacher appropriation and student learning of geometry through design. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1), 71–88.Google Scholar
  69. Jaworski, B. (1998). Mathematics teacher research: Process, practice and the development of teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(1), 3–31.Google Scholar
  70. Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(3), 203–235.Google Scholar
  71. Kersaint, G., & Chappell, M. F. (2001). Helping teachers promote problem solving with young at-risk children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(1), 57–63.Google Scholar
  72. Kwon, N., & Orrill, C. H. (2007). Understanding a teacher’s reflections: A case study of a middle school mathematics teacher. School Science and Mathematics, 107(6), 246–257.Google Scholar
  73. Lachance, A., & Confrey, J. (2003). Interconnecting content and community: A qualitative study of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(2), 107–137.Google Scholar
  74. Leikin, R., & Levav-Waynberg, A. (2007). Exploring mathematics teacher knowledge to explain the gap between theory-based recommendations and school practice in the use of connecting tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(3), 349–371.Google Scholar
  75. Lesh, R., & Kelly, A. E. (1997). Teacher’s evolving conceptions of one-to-one tutoring: A three-tiered teaching experiment. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(4), 398–430.Google Scholar
  76. Lin, X. (2001). Reflective adaptation of a technology artifact: A case study of classroom change. Cognition and Instruction, 19(4), 395–440.Google Scholar
  77. Lin, P. (2002). On enhancing teachers’ knowledge by constructing cases in classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(4), 317–349.Google Scholar
  78. Manouchehri, A. (2001). Collegial interaction and reflective practice. Action in Teacher Education, 22(4), 86–97.Google Scholar
  79. Maxwell, J. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3–11.Google Scholar
  80. Morris, A. K., & Hiebert, J. (2011). Creating shared instructional products: An alternative approach to improving teaching. Educational Researcher, 40(1), 5–21.Google Scholar
  81. Nathan, M. J., & Knuth, E. J. (2003). A study of whole classroom mathematical discourse and teacher change. Cognition and Instruction, 21(2), 175–207.Google Scholar
  82. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  83. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  84. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principals and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  85. National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell (Eds.), Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division for Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  86. National Research Council. (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. In Donovan, M. S., & Bransford, J. D. (Eds.). Committee on how people learn, A Targeted Report for Teachers. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  87. Nemirovsky, R., & Galvis, A. (2004). Facilitating grounded online interactions in video-case-based teacher professional development. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 67–79.Google Scholar
  88. Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407.Google Scholar
  89. Peng, A. (2007). Knowledge growth of mathematics teachers during professional activity based on the task of lesson explaining. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4–6), 289–299.Google Scholar
  90. Peressini, D. D., Borko, H., Romagnano, L., Knuth, E. J., & Willis, C. (2004). A conceptual framework for learning to teach secondary mathematics: A situative perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(1), 67–96.Google Scholar
  91. Peressini, D. D., & Knuth, E. J. (1998). Why are you talking when you could be listening? The role of discourse and reflection in the professional development of a secondary mathematics teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 107–125.Google Scholar
  92. Polettini, A. F. F. (2000). Mathematics teaching life histories in the study of teachers’ perceptions of change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(7), 765–783.Google Scholar
  93. Puchner, L. D., & Taylor, A. R. (2006). Lesson study, collaboration and teacher efficacy: Stories from two school-based math lesson study groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(7), 922–934.Google Scholar
  94. Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers’ learning? Two fourth-grade teachers’ use of a new mathematics text. Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 331–350.Google Scholar
  95. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.Google Scholar
  96. Remillard, J., & Bryans, M. (2004). Teachers’ orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 352–388.Google Scholar
  97. Remillard, J. T., & Geist, P. K. (2002). Supporting teachers’ professional learning by navigating openings in the curriculum. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 7–34.Google Scholar
  98. Ross, J. A., & Bruce, C. D. (2007a). Teacher self-assessment: A mechanism for facilitating professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(2), 146–159.Google Scholar
  99. Ross, J. A., & Bruce, C. D. (2007b). Professional development effects on teacher efficacy. Results of randomized field trial. Journal of Educational Research, 101(1), 50–60.Google Scholar
  100. Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Bruce, C. (2006). The impact of a professional development program on student achievement in grade 6 mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(6), 551–577.Google Scholar
  101. Schifter, D., & Lester, J. B. (2005). Active facilitation: What do facilitators need to know and how might they learn it? The Journal of Mathematics and Science: Collaborative Explorations, 8, 97–118.Google Scholar
  102. Schorr, R. Y., Firestone, W. A., & Monfils, L. (2003). State testing and mathematics teaching in New Jersey: The effects of a test without other supports. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(5), 373–405.Google Scholar
  103. Schorr, R. Y., & Koellner-Clark, K. (2003). Using a modeling approach to analyze the ways in which teachers consider new ways to teach mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2–3), 191–210.Google Scholar
  104. Scribner, J. P. (1999). Professional development: Untangling the influence of work context on teacher learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(2), 238–266.Google Scholar
  105. Senger, E. S. (1999). Reflective reform in mathematics: The recursive nature of teacher change. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(3), 199–221.Google Scholar
  106. Seymour, J. R., & Lehrer, R. (2006). Tracing the evolution of pedagogical content knowledge as the development of interanimated discourses. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 549–582.Google Scholar
  107. Sherin, M. G., & Han, S. Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 163–183.Google Scholar
  108. Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  109. Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 20–37.Google Scholar
  110. Silverman, J., & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Toward a framework for development of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 499–511.Google Scholar
  111. Simon, M. A., & Schifter, D. (1991). Towards a constructivist perspective: An intervention study of mathematics teacher development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(4), 309–331.Google Scholar
  112. Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (1999). Explicating the teacher’s perspective from the researcher’s perspective: Generating accounts of mathematics teachers’ practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(3), 252–264.Google Scholar
  113. Smylie, M. A. (1988). The enhancement function of staff-development—Organizational and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change. American Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
  114. Spillane, J. P. (2000). A fifth-grade teacher’s reconstruction of mathematics and literacy teaching: Exploring interactions among identity, learning, and subject matter. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 307–330.Google Scholar
  115. Steinberg, R. M., Empson, S. B., & Carpenter, T. P. (2004). Inquiry into children’s mathematical thinking as a means to teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(3), 237–267.Google Scholar
  116. Strauss, S. (Ed.). (1982). U shaped behavioral growth. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  117. Supovitz, J. A., Mayer, D. P., & Kahle, J. B. (2000). Promoting inquiry-based instructional practice: The longitudinal impact of professional development in the context of systemic reform. Educational Policy, 14(3), 331–356.Google Scholar
  118. Swafford, J. O., Jones, G. A., & Thornton, C. A. (1999). The impact on instructional practice of a teacher change model. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32(2), 69–82.Google Scholar
  119. Sztajn, P. (2011). Standards for reporting mathematics professional development in research studies. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(3), 220–236.Google Scholar
  120. Taylor, A. R., Anderson, S., Meyer, K., Wagner, M. K., & West, C. (2005). Lesson study: A professional development model for mathematics reform. Rural Educator, 26(2), 17–22.Google Scholar
  121. TERC. (1998). Investigations in numbers, data, and space. Menlo Park, CA: Dale Seymour.Google Scholar
  122. Thijs, A., & van den Berg, E. (2002). Peer coaching as part of a professional development program for science teachers in Botswana. International Journal of Educational Development, 22(1), 55–68.Google Scholar
  123. Ticha, M., & Hospesova, A. (2006). Qualified pedagogical reflection as a way to improve mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(2), 129–156.Google Scholar
  124. Timmerman, M. A. (2000). Learning in the context of a mathematics teacher education course: Two case studies of elementary teachers’ conceptions of mathematics, mathematics teaching and learning, and the teaching of mathematics with technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 247–258.Google Scholar
  125. Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration [BES]. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  126. Tobin, K., & Espinet, M. (1990). Teachers as peer coaches in high school mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 90(3), 232–244.Google Scholar
  127. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276.Google Scholar
  128. Walter, J. G., & Gerson, H. (2007). Teachers’ personal agency: Making sense of slope through additive structures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65(2), 203–233.Google Scholar
  129. Warfield, J., Wood, T., & Lehman, J. D. (2005). Autonomy, beliefs and the learning of elementary mathematics teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 439–456.Google Scholar
  130. Wise, V. L., Spiegel, A. N., & Bruning, R. H. (1999). Using teacher reflective practice to evaluate professional development in mathematics and science. Journal of Teacher Education, 50(1), 42–49.Google Scholar
  131. Zech, L. K., Gause-Vega, C. L., Bray, M. H., Secules, T., & Goldman, S. R. (2000). Content-based collaborative inquiry: A professional development model for sustaining educational reform. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 207–217.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lynn T. Goldsmith
    • 1
  • Helen M. Doerr
    • 2
  • Catherine C. Lewis
    • 3
  1. 1.Education Development Center, Inc.WalthamUSA
  2. 2.Syracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA
  3. 3.Mills CollegeOaklandUSA

Personalised recommendations