Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 379–397 | Cite as

Prospective elementary school teachers’ professional noticing of children’s early numeracy

  • Edna O. Schack
  • Molly H. Fisher
  • Jonathan N. Thomas
  • Sara Eisenhardt
  • Janet Tassell
  • Margaret Yoder
Article

Abstract

The goal of this study is to develop the professional noticing abilities of prospective elementary school teachers in the context of the Stages of Early Arithmetic Learning. In their mathematics methods course, ninety-four prospective elementary school teachers from three institutions participated in a researcher-developed five-session module that progressively nests the three interrelated components of professional noticing—attending, interpreting, and deciding. The module embeds video excerpts of diagnostic interviews of children doing mathematics (representations of practice) to prepare the prospective teachers for similar work. The module culminates with prospective teachers implementing similar diagnostic interviews (approximations of practice) to gain experience in the three component skills of professional noticing. A pre- and post-assessment was administered to measure prospective teachers’ change in the three components. A Wilcoxon signed ranks test was conducted and found the prospective elementary school teachers demonstrated significant growth in all three components. Selected prospective elementary school teacher responses on the pre- and post-assessment are provided to illustrate sample growth in the prospective teachers’ abilities to professionally notice. These results, the first in an ongoing study, indicate the potential that prospective teachers can develop professional noticing skills through this module. Continued data collection and analysis from the ongoing study by these authors and future, longer-term emphasis on professional noticing for prospective teachers should be studied.

Keywords

Elementary school education Learning progressions Number concepts and operations Pedagogies of practice Teacher education 

References

  1. Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understanding that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball, D. L., Forzani, F., Goldin, S., Noel, B., O’Neill, M. K., Pasek, L., et al. (2011). Resource document. Teaching works. http://www.teachingworks.org/work-of-teaching/high-leverage-content. Accessed March 4, 2012.
  3. Boerst, T. A., Sleep, L., Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2011). Preparing teachers to lead mathematics discussions. Teachers College Record, 113(12), 2844–2877.Google Scholar
  4. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2010). Resource document. Carnegie Foundation. http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org/descriptions/basic.php. Accessed March 13, 2012.
  5. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Empson, S. B. (1999). Children’s mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  6. Clements, D. H. (2007). Curriculum research: Toward a framework for “research-based curricula”. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 35–70.Google Scholar
  7. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of the grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  8. Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111, 2055–2100. http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 15018.
  9. Grossman, P. (2011). Framework for teaching practice: A brief history of an idea. Teachers College Record, 113(12), 2836–2843.Google Scholar
  10. Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.Google Scholar
  11. Kersting, N. B., Givvin, K. B., Sotelo, F. L., & Stigler, J. W. (2010). Teachers’ analyses of classroom video predict student learning of mathematics: Further explorations of a novel measure of teacher knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 172–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mason, J. (2011). Noticing: Roots and branches. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 35–50). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Mulligan, J., Bobis, J., & Francis, C. (1999). Insights into early numeracy: The count me in too project. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 4, 22–27.Google Scholar
  14. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  15. Olive, J. (2001). Children’s number sequences: An explanation of Steffe’s constructs and an extrapolation to rational numbers of arithmetic. The Mathematics Educator, 11, 4–9.Google Scholar
  16. Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  17. Schifter, D., Bastable, V., & Russell, S. J. (2000). Developing mathematical ideas. Columbus, OH: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  18. Seago, N., Mumme, J., & Branca, N. (2004). Learning and teaching linear functions: Video cases for mathematics professional development. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  19. Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 20–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Sherin, B., & Star, J. R. (2011). Reflections on the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 66–78). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Steffe, L. P., von Glasersfeld, E., Richards, J., & Cobb, P. (1983). Children’s counting types: Philosophy, theory, and application. New York: Praeger Scientific.Google Scholar
  24. Steffe, L. P., Cobb, P., & von Glasersfeld, E. (1988). Construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Steffe, L. (1992). Learning stages in the construction of the number sequence. In J. Bideaud, C. Meljac, & J. Fischer (Eds.), Pathways to number: Children’s developing numerical abilities (pp. 83–88). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267–306). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Thomas, J. (2010). Picture this: A doctoral dissertation examining children’s quantitative mental imagery. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Cincinnati.Google Scholar
  28. Thomas, J., & Tabor, P. D. (2012). Differentiating instruction to facilitate quantitative mental imagery. Teaching Children Mathematics, 19, 174–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wright, R. J., Martland, J., & Stafford, A. (2006). Early numeracy: Assessment for teaching and intervention (2nd ed.). London, UK: Paul Chapman Publications/Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edna O. Schack
    • 1
  • Molly H. Fisher
    • 2
  • Jonathan N. Thomas
    • 3
  • Sara Eisenhardt
    • 4
  • Janet Tassell
    • 5
  • Margaret Yoder
    • 6
  1. 1.Morehead State UniversityMoreheadUSA
  2. 2.University of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  3. 3.Kentucky Center for MathematicsNorthern Kentucky UniversityHighland HeightsUSA
  4. 4.Northern Kentucky UniversityHighland HeightsUSA
  5. 5.Western Kentucky UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  6. 6.Eastern Kentucky UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations