Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating the development of prospective mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of generalising number patterns through school practicum

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the development of three prospective elementary mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of number patterns with its two components: (1) knowledge of students’ understanding and difficulties and (2) knowledge of topic-specific strategies and representations. For our investigation, we use Radford’s (ZDM Math Educ 40:83–96, 2008) framework called ‘architecture of algebraic pattern generalisation’ to redefine these two components of PCK in the context of patterns. A case study was conducted to explore the development of PCK through a school practicum course and to examine how observation of number pattern lessons in schools and discussions of these observation contribute to prospective teachers’ PCK. Analysis of the data indicated that observations and discussions of number pattern lessons resulted in considerable change in the way prospective teachers take into account students’ understanding of and difficulties with patterns, as well as in the way they use pattern-specific strategies such as algebraic pattern generalisation during their lessons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, D. W., & Clark, R. (1967). Microteaching: Its rationale. The High School Journal, 51(2), 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Assessment and content measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome (Ed.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 147–162). Hingham, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, M. E., Mayer, R. E., Moseley, B., Brar, T., Durán, R., Reed, B. S., et al. (1997). Learning by understanding: The role of multiple representations in learning algebra. American Educational Research Journal, 34(4), 663–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1996). Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1990). Classrooms as learning environments for teachers and researchers. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on teaching and learning mathematics (Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph No. 4, pp. 125–146). Reston, VA: NCTM.

  • Cooper, T., & Warren, E. (2008). The effect of different representations on years 3 to 5 students’ ability to generalise. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, L., & Warren, E. (1998). Introducing the variable through pattern exploration. Mathematics Teacher, 91(2), 166–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, M., Threlfall, J., Frobisher, L., & Shorrocks Taylor, D. (1999). Children’s strategies with linear and quadratic sequences. In A. Orton (Ed.), Pattern in the teaching and learning of mathematics. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. (1993). Algebra in the primary school. Education, 21(2), 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J. J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 515–556). Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J. (1999). Teaching and learning a new algebra. In E. Fennema & T. Romnberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 133–155). Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, B. A., & Hirsch, C. R. (1998). Student preferences for representations of functions. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 29(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovarik, K. (2008). Mathematics educators’ and teachers’ perceptions of pedagogical content knowledge. Unpublished doctorate dissertation, Colombia University.

  • Lannin, J. (2002). Developing middle school students’ understanding of recursive and explicit reasoning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Lannin, J. (2005). Generalization and justification: The challenge of introducing algebraic reasoning through patterning activities. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(3), 231–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G., Stein, M. K., & Zaslavsky, O. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, M., & Stacey, K. (1995). The effect of different approaches to algebra on students’ perceptions of functional relationships. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 7(1), 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, L., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra (pp. 65–86). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2005). İlköğretim matematik dersi 68. sınıflar öğretim programı. Ankara: Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü Basım Evi.

  • Orton, A., & Orton, J. (1999). Pattern and the approach to algebra. In A. Orton (Ed.), Pattern in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 104–120). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton, J., Orton, A., & Roper, T. (1999). Pictorial and practical contexts and the perception of pattern. In A. Orton (Ed.), Patterns in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 121–136). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as Professionals. Research in Science Education, 38, 261–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, J., & Brunheira, L. (2001). Analysing practice in pre-service mathematics teacher education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 3, 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech and the sprouting of signs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2006). Algebraic thinking and the generalization of patterns: A semiotic perspective. In J. L. C. S. Alatorre, M. Sáiz, & A. Méndez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, North American Chapter (Vol. 1, pp. 2–21). Mexico: Mérida.

  • Radford, L. (2008). Iconicity and contraction: A semiotic investigation of forms of algebraic generalizations of patterns in different contexts. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rico, L., Castro, E., & Romero, I. (1996). The role of representation systems in the learning of numerical structures. En Gutiérrez, A., Puig, L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 87–102). Valencia, Spain: IGPME.

  • Rivera, F. D. (2010). Visual templates in pattern generalization activity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73, 297–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, M. A., & Schifter, D. (1991). Toward a constructivist perspective: An intervention study of mathematics teacher development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swafford, J. O., & Langrall, C. W. (2000). Grade 6 students’ pre-instructional use of equations to describe and represent problem situations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren E., & Cooper, T. J. (2006). Repeating and growing pattern rules: Relationships between geometric and numerical representations. Presentation at the annual conference of American Education Research Association. San Francisco, USA.

  • Warren, E., & Cooper, T. J. (2007). Repeating patterns and multiplicative thinking: Analysis of classroom interactions with 9-year-old students that support the transition from the known to the novel. Journal of Classroom Instruction, 41(2), 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zazkis, R., & Liljedahl, P. (2002). Generalization of patterns: The tension between algebraic thinking and algebraic notation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(3), 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zazkis, R., Liljedahl, P., & Chernoff, E. (2008). The role of examples in forming and refuting generalizations. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sibel Yeşildere İmre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yeşildere İmre, S., Akkoç, H. Investigating the development of prospective mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of generalising number patterns through school practicum. J Math Teacher Educ 15, 207–226 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9203-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9203-6

Keywords

Navigation