Abstract
This study investigated the extent to which three sociomathematical and four professional norms intentionally fostered in an early mathematics pedagogy course through the use of a video-case curriculum re-emerged in a similar context with two groups: (1) teacher candidates in the final mathematics pedagogy course of the same teacher education program and (2) program graduates in their beginning years of teaching. All seven norms were found to be durable over time, with the sociomathematical norm of providing a mathematical argument being the most widely and consistently exhibited among the participants. Comparisons of the behaviors exhibited by the two groups revealed that five of the norms were consistently durable over time with both groups and suggested that participants’ engagement with two of the norms was positively affected by additional classroom experience. Details of differences among the groups and ways in which the norms appeared to support continued teacher learning are examined. The results point to the long-term benefits of developing productive norms early in a teacher education program.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes
The Counting Cube problem and the accompanying video are from the Turning to the Evidence project (see Seago and Goldsmith 2005). The writing prompts were also adapted from this project.
References
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407.
Bauersfeld, H., Krummheuer, G., & Voigt, J. (1988). Interactional theory of learning and teaching mathematics. In H. G. Steiner, & A. Vermandel (Eds.), Foundations and methodology of the discipline of mathematics education (pp. 174–188). Antwerp: Proceedings of the theory of mathematics education conference.
Bernstein, B. (2004). Social class and pedagogic practice. In S. J. Ball (Ed.), The Routledge Falmer reader in sociology of education (pp. 196–217). London: Routledge.
Borko, H., Peressini, D., Romagnano, L., Knuth, E., Willis-Yorker, C., Wooley, C., et al. (2000). Teacher education does matter: A situative view of learning to teach secondary mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 147–217.
Clark, P. G., Moore, K. C., & Carlson, M. P. (2008). Documenting the emergence of “speaking with meaning” as a sociomathematical norm in professional learning community discourse. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27, 297–310.
Cobb, P., & Bauersfeld, H. (1995). The coordination of psychological and sociological perspectives in mathematics education. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 1–16). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1/2), 113–163.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & McNeal, B. (1992). Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 573–604.
Dixon, J. K., Andreasen, J. B., & Stephan, M. (2009). Establishing social and sociomathematical norms in an undergraduate mathematics content course for prospective teachers: The role of the instructor. In D. S. Mewborn & H. S. Lee (Eds.), AMTE monograph 6: Scholarly practices and inquiry in the preparation of mathematics teachers (pp. 43–66). San Diego: Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.
Elliott, R., Kazemi, E., Lesseig, K., Carroll, C., Mumme, J., & Kelly-Petersen, M. (2009). Conceptualizing the work of leading mathematical tasks in professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(4), 364–379.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.
Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Ansell, E., & Behrend, J. (1998). Understanding teachers’ self-sustaining, generative change in the context of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 67–80.
Grant, T. J., Lo, J.-J., & Flowers, J. (2007). Shaping prospective teachers’ justifications for computation: Challenges and opportunities. Teaching Children Mathematics, 14(2), 112–116.
Hiebert, F., Morris, A. K., Berk, D., & Jansen, A. (2007). Preparing teachers to learn from teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 47–61.
Kaasila, R., & Lauriala, A. (2010). Towards a collaborative, interactionist model of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 854–862.
Kazemi, E., Elliott, R., Hubbard, A., Carroll, C., & Mumme, J. (2007). Doing mathematics in professional development: Theorizing teacher learning with and through sociomathematical norms. In T. Lamberg & L. R. Wiest (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 796–803). Lake Tahoe, NV: University of Nevada, Reno.
Kazemi, E., & Stipek, D. (2001). Promoting conceptual thinking in four upper-elementary mathematics classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 102(1), 59–80.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N. B., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S. E., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Martin, T. S., McCrone, S. M. S., Bower, M. L. W., & Dindyal, J. (2005). The interplay of teacher and student actions in the teaching and learning of geometric proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60(1), 95–124.
McClain, K. (2002). Teacher’s and students’ understanding: The role of tools and inscriptions in supporting effective communication. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2/3), 217–249.
McClain, K. (2009). When is an argument just an argument? The refinement of mathematical argumentation. In D. A. Stylianou, M. L. Blanton, & E. J. Knuth (Eds.), Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K-16 perspective (pp. 222–234). NY: Routledge.
McClain, K., & Cobb, P. (1997). An analysis of the teacher’s role in guiding the evolution of sociomathematical norms. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), International conference for the psychology of mathematics education, Vol. 3 (pp. 224–231), Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.
McNeal, B., & Simon, M. A. (2000). Mathematics culture clash: Negotiating new classroom norms with prospective teachers. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(4), 475–509.
Mottier Lopez, L., & Allah, L. (2007). Sociomathematical norms and the regulation of problem solving in classroom microcultures. International Journal of Educational Research, 46, 252–265.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Peressini, D., Borko, H., Romagnano, L., Knuth, E., & Willis, C. (2004). A conceptual framework for learning to teach secondary mathematics: A situative perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 67–96.
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: Implications of new visions of cognition. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 1223–1296). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
ResearchWare. (2007). HyperResearch: Qualitative analysis tool (version 2.8). Randolph, MA: ResearchWare, Inc.
Seago, N., & Goldsmith, L. (2005). Turning to the evidence: Examining the impact of two professional development programs focused on algebraic thinking. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Seago, N., Mumme, J., & Branca, N. (2004). Learning and teaching linear functions: Video cases for mathematics professional development, 6–10. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Sherin, M. G. (2001). Developing a professional vision of classroom events. In T. Wood, B. S. Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics (pp. 75–93). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Simon, M. A., & Blume, G. W. (1996). Justification in the mathematics classroom: A study of prospective elementary teachers. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(1), 3–31.
Smith, M. S., & Friel, S. N. (Eds.). (2008). AMTE Monograph 4: Cases in mathematics education: Tools for developing knowledge needed for teaching. San Diego, CA: Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.
Stockero, S. L. (2008a). Using a video-based curriculum to develop a reflective stance in prospective mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(5), 373–394.
Stockero, S. L. (2008b). Differences in preservice mathematics teachers’ reflective abilities attributable to use of a video case curriculum. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(4), 483–509.
Stylianou, D. A., & Blanton, M. L. (2002). Sociocultural factors in undergraduate mathematics: The role of explanation and justification. Paper presented at the second international conference on the teaching of mathematics, Crete, Greece.
Tatsis, K., & Koleza, E. (2008). Social and socio-mathematical norms in collaborative problem-solving. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(1), 89–100.
Van Zoest, L. R., & Stockero, S. L. (2008a). Using a video-case curriculum to develop preservice teachers’ knowledge and skills. In M. S. Smith & S. Friel (Eds.), AMTE monograph 4: Cases in mathematics teacher education: Tools for developing knowledge needed for teaching (pp. 117–132). San Diego, CA: AMTE.
Van Zoest, L. R., & Stockero, S. L. (2008b). Concentric task sequences: A model for advancing instruction based on student thinking. In F. Arbaugh & P. M. Taylor (Eds.), AMTE Monograph 5: Inquiry into mathematics teacher education (pp. 47–58). San Diego, CA: Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.
Voigt, J. (1998). The culture of the mathematics classroom: Negotiating the mathematical meaning of empirical phenonema. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt, & U. Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 191–220). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Yackel, E. (2002). What can we learn from analyzing the teacher’s role in collective argumentation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 423–440.
Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477.
Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1991). Small-group interactions as a source of learning opportunities in second-grade mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 390–408.
Yackel, E., Rasmussen, C., & King, K. (2000). Social and sociomathematical norms in an advanced undergraduate mathematics course. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 275–287.
Acknowledgments
The research reported here was supported in part by the US National Science Foundation under grant no. ESI-0243558, awarded to Judy Mumme and Nanette Seago, WestEd. The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of the Foundation. Portions of this article were presented at the annual conferences of the Psychology of Mathematics Education North American Chapter in 2009 and the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education in 2010. The authors would like to acknowledge Judy Mumme for her contributions to shaping the ideas in this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Zoest, L.R., Stockero, S.L. & Taylor, C.E. The durability of professional and sociomathematical norms intentionally fostered in an early pedagogy course. J Math Teacher Educ 15, 293–315 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9183-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9183-y
Keywords
- Sociomathematical norms
- Professional norms
- Teacher education
- Norm durability
- Mathematics pedagogy course
- Video-case curriculum