Prediction assessments: Using video-based predictions to assess prospective teachers’ knowledge of students’ mathematical thinking
- 514 Downloads
In order to evaluate the effectiveness of an experimental elementary mathematics field experience course, we have designed a new assessment instrument. These video-based prediction assessments engage prospective teachers in a video analysis of a child solving mathematical tasks. The prospective teachers build a model of that child’s mathematics and then use that model to predict how the child will respond to a subsequent task. In this paper, we share data concerning the evolution and effectiveness of the instrument. Results from implementation indicate moderate to high degrees of inter-rater reliability in using the rubric to assess prospective teachers’ models and predictions. They also indicate strong correlation between participation in the experimental course and prospective teachers’ performances on the video-based prediction assessments. Such findings suggest that prediction assessments effectively evaluate the pedagogical content knowledge that we are seeking to foster among the prospective teachers.
KeywordsTeacher knowledge Instrument development Video Preservice teacher education Pedagogical content knowledge
The research reported in this paper was supported by a DR-K12 grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF), under grant number DRL-0732143. The authors wish to thank all the members of the IMB research team, as well as Dionne Cross, who collaborated with us in collecting data.
- Ball, D. L. (1994, November). Developing mathematics reform: What don’t we know about teacher learning—but would make good working hypotheses? Paper presented at Conference on Teacher Enhancement in Mathematics K–6, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
- Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Confrey, J. (1988). Multiplication and splitting: Their role in understanding exponential functions. Paper presented at the tenth annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, DeKalb, IL.Google Scholar
- Confrey, J. (1993). Learning to see children’s mathematics: Crucial challenges in constructivist reform. In K. Tobin (Ed.), Constructivist perspectives in science and mathematics (pp. 299–321). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
- Confrey, J. (1994). Splitting, similarity and rate of change: A new approach to multiplication and exponential functions. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 291–330). Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
- Confrey, J., & Lachance, A. (2000). Transformative teaching experiments through conjecture driven research design. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 231–265). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Crespo, S., & Nicol, C. (2003). Learning to investigate students’ mathematical thinking: The role of student interviews. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 joint meeting of PME and PMENA (Vol. 2, pp. 261–267). Honolulu: College of Education, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
- Education Commission of the States. (2003a). Eight questions on teacher preparation: What does the research say? Retrieved July, 2006, from www.ecs.org/tpreport.
- Education Commission of the States. (2003b). Eight questions on teacher preparation: What does the research say? A summary of the findings. Retrieved July, 2006, from http://www.ecs.org/ecsmain.asp?page=/html/educationIssues/teachingquality/tpreport/.
- Educational Testing Service (2006). State requirements. Retrieved June 27, 2006, from http://www.ets.org/portal/site/ets/menuitem.22f30af61d34e9c39a77b13bc3921509/vgnextoid=d378197a484f4010VgnVCM10000022f95190RCRD.
- Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.Google Scholar
- Kane, T. J., Rockoff, J. E., & Staiger, D. O. (2006). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Retrieved July, 2006, from http://gseweb.harvard.edu/news/features/kane/nycfellowsmarch2006.pdf.
- Lewis, C. C. (2000, April). Lesson study: The core of Japanese professional development. Invited presentation to the Special Interest Group on Research in Mathematics Education at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
- No Child Left Behind of 2001. (2001, January). Public Law No. 107–110, 107th Congress. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/legislation/ESEA02/.
- Philipp, R. A., Ambrose, R., Lamb, L. L. C., Sowder, J. T., Schappelle, B. P., Sowder, L., et al. (2007). Effects of early field experiences on the mathematical content knowledge and beliefs of prospective elementary school teachers: An experimental study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(5), 438–476.Google Scholar
- Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
- Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: A conception of teacher knowledge. American Educator, 10(1), 9–15.Google Scholar
- Steffe, L. P. (1991). Mathematics curriculum design: A constructivist’s perspective. In L. P. Steffe & T. Wood (Eds.), International perspectives on transforming early childhood mathematics education (pp. 389–398). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267–306). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 571–596.Google Scholar
- Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276.Google Scholar
- von Glasersfeld, E., & Steffe, L. P. (1991). Conceptual models in educational research and practice. Journal of Educational Thought, 25(2), 91–103.Google Scholar
- Wright, R. J. (2000). Professional development in recovery education. In L. P. Steffe & P. W. Thompson (Eds.), Radical constructivism in action: Building on the pioneering work of Ernst von Glasersfeld (pp. 134–151). London: Falmer.Google Scholar