This article examines mathematics teacher collegiality by focusing on both the ways in which teachers interacted as critical colleagues in a long-term professional development project and the evolving role of the teacher–educator–researcher as the facilitator of this project. The professional development collaboration comprised two phases: one focused on reading classroom discourse literature and one focused on supporting each other through cycles of action research related to mathematics classroom discourse. Lord’s (1994) critical colleagueship framework is used to examine how a study group of middle-grades (ages 11–16) mathematics teacher–researchers took (or did not take) a more critical stance toward their own teaching practice and that of their colleagues. We found that challenging interactions were related to instances in which the teachers interacted as critical colleagues and were marked by particular features including the use of particular words and the use of personal experience as a form of evidence. We present the ways in which we came to understand what it might look like to scrutinize one’s practice and findings related to the development of this type of collegiality across the two different phases of this project. We end with a section in which the teacher–educator–researcher who facilitated the professional development project reflects on the ways in which the analysis caused her to reconsider both the nature of argumentation in mathematics study group settings and what implications this has with respect to her own practice as a facilitator.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Arbaugh, F. (2003). Study groups as a form of professional development for secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 139–163.
Atweh, B. (2004). Understanding for changing and changing for understanding: Praxis between practice and theory through action research in mathematics education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology (pp. 187–205). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematics horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 373–397.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
Crespo, S. (2006). Elementary teacher talk in mathematics study groups. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 29–56.
Edelsky, C. (1993). Who’s got the floor? In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 189–227). New York: Oxford University Press.
Fassnacht, C., & Woods, D. (2005). Transana v2.0x [software]. Madison, WI: Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin.
Florio-Ruane, S. (2001). Teacher education and the cultural imagination: Autobiography, conversation, and narrative. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2000). How discourse structures norms: A tale of two middle school mathematics classrooms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Cirillo, M. (Eds.). (2009). Promoting purposeful discourse: Teacher research in secondary math classrooms. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Drake, C., & Cirillo, M. (2009). “Muddying the clear waters”: Teachers’ take-up of the linguistic idea of revoicing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 268–277.
Hopkins, D. (2002). A teacher’s guide to classroom research (3rd ed.). New York: Open University Press & McGraw-Hill.
Jaworski, B. (2006). Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a mode of learning in teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 187–211.
Juzwik, M. M. (2009). A rhetoric of teaching: Performing Holocaust narratives in a literacy classroom. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Krainer, K. (1999). Teacher growth and school development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 223–225.
Labaree, D. F. (2003). The peculiar problems of preparing educational researchers. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 13–22.
Lachance, A., & Confrey, J. (2003). Interconnecting content and community: A qualitative study of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 107–137.
Lappan, G., Fey, J., Friel, S., Fitzgerald, W., & Phillips, E. (1995). The connected mathematics project. Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour Publications.
Lieberman, A., Saxl, E. R., & Miles, M. B. (2000). Teacher leadership: Ideology and practice. The Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership (pp. 348–365). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Little, J. W. (1990). Teachers as colleagues. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Schools as collaborative cultures: Creating the future now (pp. 165–193). New York: Falmer Press.
Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 129–151.
Lord, B. (1994). Teachers’ professional development: Critical colleagueship and the role of professional communities. In N. Cobb (Ed.), The future of education: Perspectives on national standards in education (pp. 175–204). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
Males, L. M. (2009). Confronting practice: Critical colleagueship in a mathematics teacher study group. In S. L. Swars, D. W. Stinson, & S. Lemons-Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 929–937). Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.
Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Sherin, M. G., & Han, S. Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 163–183.
Slavit, D., & Nelson, T. H. (2010). Collaborative teacher inquiry as a tool for building theory on the development and use of rich mathematical tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 201–221.
Smith, J. P., I. I. I. (1996). Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 387–402.
Stallings, J., & Kowalski, T. J. (1990). Professional development schools. In R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education. New York: Macmillan.
Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173–209.
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). The blue and brown books. Oxford, NY: Basil Blackwell.
Zack, V., & Graves, B. (2001). Making mathematical meaning through dialogue: “Once you think of it, the z minus three seems pretty weird”. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 229–271.
This study was supported by an NSF grant (#0347906, Herbel-Eisenmann, PI). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF. We would like to thank the teachers for allowing us to work in their classrooms, Susan Florio-Ruane and Mary Juzwik for insightful discussions, and the editors and reviewers for valuable feedback.
About this article
Cite this article
Males, L.M., Otten, S. & Herbel-Eisenmann, B.A. Challenges of critical colleagueship: examining and reflecting on mathematics teacher study group interactions. J Math Teacher Educ 13, 459–471 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-010-9156-6
- Teacher study groups
- Professional development
- Critical colleagueship
- Middle-grades mathematics