Abstract
This is an intervention study that explored the effect of using video lesson analysis methodology (VLAM) on the ability of prospective middle/high school mathematics teachers to analyze mathematics teaching. The sample of the study consisted of 26 female prospective mathematics teachers enrolled in a methods course at the United Arab Emirates University. The participants were divided equally into two groups, experimental and control. The experimental group was involved in video lesson analysis where they analyzed ten video lessons throughout the semester. The group members interacted via discussion forums through Blackboard technology. Both groups wrote analyses of two video lessons, one before the intervention program and another at the end of it. It was found that the intervention remarkably improved the ability to analyze mathematics teaching of the experimental group while little improvement occurred to the control group. Implications for teacher education programs are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
E and C correspond to experimental and control group, respectively. The number next to the letter is used to identify a participant.
References
Alsawaie, O. N. (2004). Problem solving, reasoning, and communication: Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and practices (Vol. 94). Ain Shams University: College of Education Journal.
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417–436.
Cangelosi, J. S. (2003). Teaching mathematics in secondary and middle school: An interactive approach. OH, USA: Merill Prentice Hall.
Collins, A. (1999). The changing infrastructure of education research. In E. C. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities (pp. 289–298). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1987). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Frederiksen, J. R., Sipusic, M., Sherin, M. G., & Wolfe, E. (1998). Video portfolio assessment: Creating a framework for viewing the functions of teaching. Educational Assessment, 5(4), 225–297.
Friel, S. N., & Carboni, L. W. (2000). Using video-based pedagogy in an elementary mathematics methods course. School Science and Mathematics, 100(3), 118–127.
Hammer, D. (2000). Teacher inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 184–215). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Hawkins, D. (1973). What it means to teach. Teachers College Record, 75(1), 7–16.
Hiebert, J. (2003). What research says about the NCTM standards. In J. Kilpatrick, G. W. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 5–23). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Hiebert, J., Morris, A. K., Berk, D., & Jansen, A. (2007). Preparing teachers to learn from teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 47–61.
Hughes, J. E., Packard, B. W., & Pearson, P. D. (2000). Expanding notions: Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of using hypermedia and video to examine the nature of literacy instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 32(4), 599–629.
Jaworski, B. (1994). Investigating mathematics teaching. London: Falmer Press.
Kagan, D. (1993). Contexts for the use of classroom cases. American Educational Research Journal, 30(4), 117–129.
Leinhardt, G., Putnam, R. T., Stein, M. K., & Baxter, J. (1991). Where subject knowledge matters. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (pp. 87–113). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Manouchehri, A., & Enderson, M. C. (2003). The utility of case study methodology in mathematics teacher preparation. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(1), 113–135.
Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. New York: Routledge Falmer.
McClain, K., & Cobb, P. (2001). An analysis of development of socio-mathematical norms in one-first-grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(3), 236–266.
Ministry of Education. (2001). The national document for mathematics curriculum in public education. Dubai, UAE: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Nemser, S. F. (1983). Learning to teach. In L. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 150–170). New York: Longman.
Santagata, R. (2009). Designing video-based professional development for mathematics teachers in low-performing schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 38–51.
Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(2), 123–140.
Schaefer, R. J. (1967). The school as the center of inquiry. New York: Harper & Row.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1–94.
Schorr, R. Y., & Lesh, R. (2003). A models and modeling perspective on classroom-based teacher development. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: A models and modeling perspective on teaching, learning, and problem-solving in mathematics education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sherin, M. G. (2001). Developing a professional vision of classroom events. In T. Wood, B. Scott Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics (pp. 75–93). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sherin, M. G., & Han, S. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 163–183.
Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2005). Using video to support teacher’s ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology in Teacher Education, 13(3), 475–491.
Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video cub participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20–37.
Shulman, L. S. (1996). Just in case: Reflections on learning from experience. In J. A. Colbert, P. Desberg, & K. Trimble (Eds.), The case for education: Contemporary approaches for using case methods (pp. 197–217). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Sipusic, M. (1994, April). Access to practice equals growth: teacher participation in a video club. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Skyes, G., & Bird, T. (1992). Teacher education and the case idea. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 18, pp. 457–521). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1997). Understanding and improving classroom mathematics instruction: An overview of the TIMSS video study. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 14–21.
Swars, S. L. (2005). Examining perceptions of mathematics teaching effectiveness among elementary prospective teachers with differing levels of mathematics teacher efficacy. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(2), 139–147.
van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002, April). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244–276.
van Zoest, L. R., & Stockero, S. L. (2008). Synergistic scaffolds as a means to support preservice teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 2038–2048.
Walen, S. B., & Williams, S. R. (2000). Validating classroom issues: Case method in support of teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 3–26.
Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Socio-mathematical norms, argumentation and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–477.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alsawaie, O.N., Alghazo, I.M. The effect of video-based approach on prospective teachers’ ability to analyze mathematics teaching. J Math Teacher Educ 13, 223–241 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9138-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9138-8