# ‘Me and maths’: towards a definition of attitude grounded on students’ narratives

## Abstract

The attitude construct is widely used by teachers and researchers in mathematics education. Often, however, teachers’ diagnosis of ‘negative attitude’ is a causal attribution of students’ failure, perceived as global and uncontrollable, rather than an accurate interpretation of students’ behaviour, capable of steering future action. In order to make this diagnosis useful for dealing with students’ difficulties in mathematics, it is necessary to clarify the construct *attitude* from a theoretical viewpoint, while keeping in touch with the practice that motivates its use. With this aim, we investigated how students tell their own relationship with mathematics, proposing the essay “Me and maths” to more than 1,600 students (1st to 13th grade). A multidimensional characterisation of a student’s attitude towards mathematics emerges from this study. This characterisation and the study of the evolution of attitude have many important consequences for teachers’ practice and education. For example, the study shows how the relationship with mathematics is rarely told as stable, even by older students: this result suggests that it is never too late to change students’ attitude towards mathematics.

## Keywords

Attitude towards mathematics Teachers’ education Students’ failure in mathematics Narrative research## References

- Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. A. Murchinson (Ed.),
*A handbook of social psychology*(pp. 798–844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar - Arsac, G., Balacheff, N., & Mante, M. (1992). Teacher’s role and reproducibility of didactical situations.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics,**23*(1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bishop, A. J. (1998). Research and practioners. In J. Kilpatrick & A. Sierpinska (Eds.),
*Mathematics education as a research domain: a search for identity*(pp. 33–45). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Brown, S., & Cooney, T. (1991). Stalking the dualism between theory and practice.
*Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik,**23*(4), 112–117.Google Scholar - Bruner, J. (1990).
*Acts of meaning*. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar - Chapman, O. (1997). Metaphors in the teaching of mathematical problem solving.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics,**32*(3), 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Chapman, O. (2002). Belief structure and inservice high school mathematics teacher growth. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.),
*Beliefs: a hidden variable in mathematics education?*(pp. 177–193). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry.
*Educational Researcher,**19*(5), 2–14.Google Scholar - Cortazzi, M. (1993).
*Narrative analysis*. London: Routledge.Google Scholar - Da Ponte, J. P. (2001). Professional narratives in mathematics teacher education. In E. Simmt & B. Davis (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 2001 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group*(pp. 61–65). AB, Canada: CMESG.Google Scholar - Daskalogianni, K., & Simpson, A. (2000). Towards a definition of attitude: The relationship between the affective and the cognitive in pre-university students. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 24th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education*(Vol. 3, pp. 217–224). Hiroshima, Japan: PME.Google Scholar - DeBellis, V., & Goldin, G. A. (1999). Aspects of affect: Mathematical intimacy, mathematical integrity. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.),
*Proceedings of the 23rd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education*(Vol. 2, pp. 249–256). Haifa, Israel: PME.Google Scholar - Demazière, D., & Dubar, C. (1997).
*Analyser les entretiens biographiques*. Paris: Éditions Nathan.Google Scholar - Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2001). Attitude toward mathematics: some theoretical issues. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.),
*Proceedings of the 25th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education*(Vol. 3, pp. 351–358). Utrecht, The Netherlands: PME.Google Scholar - Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2002). An attempt to describe a ‘negative’ attitude toward mathematics. In P. Di Martino (Ed.),
*Proceedings of the MAVI-XI European workshop*(pp. 22–29). Pisa, Italy: Universitá di Pisa Press.Google Scholar - Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2003). What does ‘positive’ attitude really mean? In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Doherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 27th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education*(Vol. 4, pp. 451–458). Honolulu, Hawai’i: PME.Google Scholar - Eisenhart, M. (1998). On the subject of interpretive reviews.
*Review of Educational Research,**68*(4), 389–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Fiore, G. (1999). Math-abused students: Are we prepared to teach them?
*The Mathematics Teacher,**92*(5), 403–406.Google Scholar - Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967).
*The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research*. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar - Green, T. (1971).
*The activities of teaching*. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar - Haladyna, T., Shaughnessy, J., & Shaughnessy, M. (1983). A causal analysis of attitude toward mathematics.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**14*(1), 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hannula, M. (2004). Affect towards mathematics; narratives with attitude. In M. A. Mariotti (Ed.),
*Proceedings of the third congress of the European research in mathematics education*. Pisa: Edizioni Plus. [CD ROM].Google Scholar - Hart, L. (1989). Describing the affective domain: Saying what we mean. In D. Mc Leod & V. M. Adams (Eds.),
*Affect and mathematical problem solving*(pp. 37–45). New York: Springer.Google Scholar - Karsenty, R., & Vinner, S. (2000). What do we remember when it’s over? Adults’ recollections of their mathematical experience. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 24th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education*(Vol. 3, pp. 119–126). Hiroshima, Japan: PME.Google Scholar - Kulm, G. (1980). Research on mathematics attitude. In R. J. Shumway (Ed.),
*Research in mathematics education*(pp. 356–387). Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar - Leder, G. (1985). Measurement of attitude to mathematics.
*For the Learning of Mathematics,**34*(5), 18–21.Google Scholar - Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998).
*Narrative research. Reading, analysis, and interpretation*. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar - Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**28*(1), 26–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mandler, G. (1989). Affect and learning: Reflections and prospects. In D. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.),
*Affect and mathematical problem solving*(pp. 237–244). New York: Springer.Google Scholar - Mayer, R. (1990). Review: affect + cognition = mathematical problem solving.
*Educational Researcher,**19*(1), 35–36.Google Scholar - McLeod, D. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. Grows (Ed.),
*Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning*(pp. 575–596). New York: McMillan.Google Scholar - McLeod, D., & Adams, V. M. (Eds.). (1989).
*Affect and mathematical problem solving*. New York: Springer.Google Scholar - Neale, D. (1969). The role of attitudes in learning mathematics.
*The Arithmetic Teacher*, Dec., 631–641.Google Scholar - Nicholls, J., Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & Patashnick, M. (1990). Assessing student’s theories of success in mathematics: Individual and classroom difference.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**21*(2), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pajares, F., & Miller, D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis.
*Journal of Educational Psychology,**86*(2), 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Polanyi, M. (1958).
*Personal knowledge*. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar - Polo, M., & Zan, R. (2006). Teachers’ use of the construct ‘attitude’. Preliminary research findings. In M. Bosch (Ed.),
*Proceedings of the fourth congress of the European research in mathematics education*. Barcelona: FundEmi. [CD ROM].Google Scholar - Ruffell, M., Mason, J., & Allen, B. (1998). Studying attitude to mathematics.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics,**35*(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schoenfeld, A. (1989). Explorations of students’ mathematical beliefs and behaviour.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**20*(4), 338–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.
*Educational Researcher,**15*(2), 4–14.Google Scholar - Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding.
*Mathematics Teaching,**77*, 20–26.Google Scholar - Spence, D. P. (1982).
*Narrative truth and historical truth: Meaning and interpretation in psychoanalysis*. New York: Norton.Google Scholar - Weiner, B. (1974).
*Achievement motivation and attribution theory*. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar - Zan, R., Brown, L., Evans, J., & Hannula, M. (2006). Affect in mathematics education: An introduction.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics,**63*(2), 113–121 (Special Issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar