Advertisement

Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 27–48 | Cite as

‘Me and maths’: towards a definition of attitude grounded on students’ narratives

  • Pietro Di Martino
  • Rosetta Zan
Article

Abstract

The attitude construct is widely used by teachers and researchers in mathematics education. Often, however, teachers’ diagnosis of ‘negative attitude’ is a causal attribution of students’ failure, perceived as global and uncontrollable, rather than an accurate interpretation of students’ behaviour, capable of steering future action. In order to make this diagnosis useful for dealing with students’ difficulties in mathematics, it is necessary to clarify the construct attitude from a theoretical viewpoint, while keeping in touch with the practice that motivates its use. With this aim, we investigated how students tell their own relationship with mathematics, proposing the essay “Me and maths” to more than 1,600 students (1st to 13th grade). A multidimensional characterisation of a student’s attitude towards mathematics emerges from this study. This characterisation and the study of the evolution of attitude have many important consequences for teachers’ practice and education. For example, the study shows how the relationship with mathematics is rarely told as stable, even by older students: this result suggests that it is never too late to change students’ attitude towards mathematics.

Keywords

Attitude towards mathematics Teachers’ education Students’ failure in mathematics Narrative research 

References

  1. Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. A. Murchinson (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology (pp. 798–844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arsac, G., Balacheff, N., & Mante, M. (1992). Teacher’s role and reproducibility of didactical situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishop, A. J. (1998). Research and practioners. In J. Kilpatrick & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: a search for identity (pp. 33–45). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, S., & Cooney, T. (1991). Stalking the dualism between theory and practice. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 23(4), 112–117.Google Scholar
  5. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chapman, O. (1997). Metaphors in the teaching of mathematical problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32(3), 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapman, O. (2002). Belief structure and inservice high school mathematics teacher growth. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: a hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 177–193). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  8. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.Google Scholar
  9. Cortazzi, M. (1993). Narrative analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Da Ponte, J. P. (2001). Professional narratives in mathematics teacher education. In E. Simmt & B. Davis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2001 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 61–65). AB, Canada: CMESG.Google Scholar
  11. Daskalogianni, K., & Simpson, A. (2000). Towards a definition of attitude: The relationship between the affective and the cognitive in pre-university students. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 217–224). Hiroshima, Japan: PME.Google Scholar
  12. DeBellis, V., & Goldin, G. A. (1999). Aspects of affect: Mathematical intimacy, mathematical integrity. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 249–256). Haifa, Israel: PME.Google Scholar
  13. Demazière, D., & Dubar, C. (1997). Analyser les entretiens biographiques. Paris: Éditions Nathan.Google Scholar
  14. Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2001). Attitude toward mathematics: some theoretical issues. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 351–358). Utrecht, The Netherlands: PME.Google Scholar
  15. Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2002). An attempt to describe a ‘negative’ attitude toward mathematics. In P. Di Martino (Ed.), Proceedings of the MAVI-XI European workshop (pp. 22–29). Pisa, Italy: Universitá di Pisa Press.Google Scholar
  16. Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2003). What does ‘positive’ attitude really mean? In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Doherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 451–458). Honolulu, Hawai’i: PME.Google Scholar
  17. Eisenhart, M. (1998). On the subject of interpretive reviews. Review of Educational Research, 68(4), 389–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fiore, G. (1999). Math-abused students: Are we prepared to teach them? The Mathematics Teacher, 92(5), 403–406.Google Scholar
  19. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  20. Green, T. (1971). The activities of teaching. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  21. Haladyna, T., Shaughnessy, J., & Shaughnessy, M. (1983). A causal analysis of attitude toward mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(1), 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hannula, M. (2004). Affect towards mathematics; narratives with attitude. In M. A. Mariotti (Ed.), Proceedings of the third congress of the European research in mathematics education. Pisa: Edizioni Plus. [CD ROM].Google Scholar
  23. Hart, L. (1989). Describing the affective domain: Saying what we mean. In D. Mc Leod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving (pp. 37–45). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Karsenty, R., & Vinner, S. (2000). What do we remember when it’s over? Adults’ recollections of their mathematical experience. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 119–126). Hiroshima, Japan: PME.Google Scholar
  25. Kulm, G. (1980). Research on mathematics attitude. In R. J. Shumway (Ed.), Research in mathematics education (pp. 356–387). Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  26. Leder, G. (1985). Measurement of attitude to mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 34(5), 18–21.Google Scholar
  27. Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research. Reading, analysis, and interpretation. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 26–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mandler, G. (1989). Affect and learning: Reflections and prospects. In D. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving (pp. 237–244). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Mayer, R. (1990). Review: affect + cognition = mathematical problem solving. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 35–36.Google Scholar
  31. McLeod, D. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. Grows (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575–596). New York: McMillan.Google Scholar
  32. McLeod, D., & Adams, V. M. (Eds.). (1989). Affect and mathematical problem solving. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Neale, D. (1969). The role of attitudes in learning mathematics. The Arithmetic Teacher, Dec., 631–641.Google Scholar
  34. Nicholls, J., Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & Patashnick, M. (1990). Assessing student’s theories of success in mathematics: Individual and classroom difference. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pajares, F., & Miller, D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Polo, M., & Zan, R. (2006). Teachers’ use of the construct ‘attitude’. Preliminary research findings. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the fourth congress of the European research in mathematics education. Barcelona: FundEmi. [CD ROM].Google Scholar
  38. Ruffell, M., Mason, J., & Allen, B. (1998). Studying attitude to mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schoenfeld, A. (1989). Explorations of students’ mathematical beliefs and behaviour. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4), 338–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.Google Scholar
  41. Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.Google Scholar
  42. Spence, D. P. (1982). Narrative truth and historical truth: Meaning and interpretation in psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  43. Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  44. Zan, R., Brown, L., Evans, J., & Hannula, M. (2006). Affect in mathematics education: An introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 113–121 (Special Issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations