Student teaching (guided teaching by a prospective teacher under the supervision of an experienced “cooperating” teacher) provides an important opportunity for prospective teachers to increase their understanding of mathematics in and for teaching. The interactions between a student teacher and cooperating teacher provide an obvious mechanism for such learning to occur. We report here on data that is part of a larger study of eight student teacher/cooperating teacher pairs, and the core themes that emerged from their conversations. We focus on two pairs for whom the core conversational themes represent disparate approaches to mathematics in and for teaching. One pair, Blake and Mr. B., focused on controlling student behavior and rarely talked about mathematics for teaching. The other pair, Tara and Mr. T., focused on having students actively participating in the lesson and on mathematics from the students’ point of view. These contrasting experiences suggest that student teaching can have a profound effect on prospective teachers’ understanding of mathematics in and for teaching.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
By student teaching we mean a 10–15 week internship in the public schools at the end of the university program. During student teaching, the prospective teachers work with a practicing teacher (called the cooperating teacher) and a university supervisor. The student teachers take on most of the responsibilities of the cooperating teacher including teaching daily lessons, writing and grading assessments, and general classroom management.
Ball, D. (1988). The subject matter preparation of prospective mathematics teachers: Challenging the myths. East Lansing, MI: The National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005, Fall). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29, 14–22.
Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433–456). New York: Macmillan.
Ben-Peretz, M., & Rumney, S. (1991). Professional thinking in guided practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 517–530. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(91)90046-R.
Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C., Underhill, R., Jones, D., & Agard, P. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 194–222. doi:10.2307/749118.
Borko, H., & Mayfield, V. (1995). The roles of the cooperating teacher and university supervisor in learning to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 501–518. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(95)00008-8.
Brown, C. A., & Borko, H. (1992). Becoming a mathematics teacher. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 209–239). New York: Macmillan.
Eisenhart, M., Borko, H., Underhill, R., Brown, C., Jones, D., & Agard, P. (1993). Conceptual knowledge falls through the cracks: Complexities of learning to teach mathematics for understanding. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 8–40. doi:10.2307/749384.
Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15, 13–33. doi:10.1080/0260747890150102.
Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147–164). New York: Macmillan.
Fennema, E., & Romberg, T. A. (1999). Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Guyton, E., & McIntyre, D. J. (1990). Student teaching and school experiences. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 514–534). New York: Macmillan.
Haggarty, L. (1995). New ideas for teacher education: A mathematics framework. London: Cassell.
Hawkey, K. (1996). Image and the pressure to conform in learning to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 99–108. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(95)00023-D.
Hawkey, K. (1998). Mentor pedagogy and student teacher professional development: A study of two mentoring relationships. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 657–670. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00015-8.
Hersh, R. (1986). Some proposals for reviving the philosophy of mathematics. In T. Tymoczko (Ed.), New directions in the philosophy of mathematics (pp. 9–28). Boston: Birkhäuser.
Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Murray, H., et al. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 372–400.
Jaworski, B., & Gellert, U. (2003). Educating new mathematics teachers: Integrating theory and practice, and the roles of practicing teachers. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 829–875). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kahan, J. A., Cooper, D. A., & Bethea, K. A. (2003). The role of mathematics teachers’ content knowledge in their teaching: A framework for research applied to a study of student teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 223–252. doi:10.1023/A:1025175812582.
Koerner, M., Rust, R. O., & Baumgartner, F. (2002). Exploring roles in student teaching placements. Teacher Education Quarterly, Spring, 35–58.
Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mathematics Teacher Preparation Content Workshop Steering Committee. (2001). Knowing and learning mathematics for teaching. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Metcalf, K. K. (1991). The supervision of student teaching: A review of research. The Teacher Educator, 26(4), 27–42.
O’Neal, S., & Edwards, S. (1983, April). The supervision of student teaching. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Peterson, B. E., & Williams, S. R. (2001). Mentoring styles in mathematics: Two contrasting cases. In R. Speiser, C. A. Maher, & C. N. Walter (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 885–895). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
Peterson, B. E., Williams, S. R., & Durrant, V. (2000, April). Mathematical discussions in cooperating-teacher–student teacher dyads. Paper presented at the Research Presession of the 79th Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Chicago, Illinois.
Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 255–281. doi:10.1007/s10857-005-0853-5.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
Skemp, R. R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.
Tabachnick, B. R., Popkewitz, T. S., & Zeichner, K. M. (1979). Teacher education and the professional perspectives of student teachers. Interchange on Educational Policy, 10(4), 12–29. doi:10.1007/BF01810816.
Thompson, A. G., Philipp, R. A., Thompson, P. W., & Boyd, B. A. (1994). Calculational and conceptual orientations in teaching mathematics. In A. Coxford (Ed.), 1994 Yearbook of the NCTM (pp. 79–92). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Van Zoest, L. R., & Bohl, J. V. (2002). The role of curricular materials in an internship: The case of Alice and Gregory. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 265–288. doi:10.1023/A:1019816329185.
Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Seattle: University of Washington Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
About this article
Cite this article
Peterson, B.E., Williams, S.R. Learning mathematics for teaching in the student teaching experience: two contrasting cases. J Math Teacher Educ 11, 459–478 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9085-9
- Mathematics for teaching
- Student teacher
- Cooperating teacher
- Student teaching
- Content knowledge