Research suggests that understanding new images of mathematics is very challenging and can contribute to teacher resistance. An explicit exploration of personal views of mathematics may be necessary for pedagogical change. One possible way for exploring these images is through mathematical metaphors. As metaphors focus on similarities, they can be used to express already-held perceptions about the nature of mathematics. In addition to providing a way of talking about current views of mathematics, the analogous dimensions of metaphors can prompt new ways of thinking about these images. In this article, I consider the use of metaphors as a strategy for explicating elementary teachers’ views of mathematics. I claim that the investigation of metaphors of mathematics helped create a shared communicative space and enhanced the quality of the discussion with the teachers. In particular, our exploration of the metaphor mathematics is a language encouraged a consideration of the humanistic dimensions of mathematics and contributed to a varied re-imaging of mathematics.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Anthony, G. J., & Walshaw, M. A. (2004). Zero: A “none” number? Teaching Children Mathematics, 11(1), 38–42.
Ball, D. L. (1990). Breaking with experience in learning to teach mathematics: The role of a preservice methods course. For the Learning of Mathematics, 12(2), 19–28.
Bishop, A. J. (1994). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Brissenden, T. (1988). Talking about mathematics: Mathematical discussion in primary classrooms. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Durkin, K., & Shire, B. (1991). Language in mathematical education: Research and practice. Buckingham, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Gadamer, H. (1989). Truth and method. New York: Continuum Publishing Company.
Game, A., & Metcalfe, A. (1996). Passionate sociology. London: SAGE Publications.
Galilei, G., Grassi, H., Guiducci. M., & Kepler, J. (1960). The controversy on the comets of 1618. (S. Drake & C. D. O’Malley, Trans.). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press (Original work published 1623).
Gordon Calvert, L. M. (2001). Mathematical conversations within the practice of mathematics. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Hewitt, D. (1999). Arbitrary and necessary part 1: A way of viewing the mathematics curriculum. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(3), 2–9.
Joseph, G. G. (2000). The crest of the peacock: Non-European roots of mathematics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge. Boston: Shambhala Publications.
Miura, I. T., Okamoto, Y., Kim, C. C., Chang, C.-M., Steere, M., & Fayol, M. (1994). Comparisons of children’s cognitive representation of number: China, France, Japan, Korea, Sweden, and the United States. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17(3), 401–411.
Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed., 1989). In J. A. Simpson & E. S. C. Weiner (Eds.), Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford University Press.
Pimm, D. (1986). Beyond reference. Mathematics Teaching, 116, 48–51.
Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Pimm, D. (1988). Mathematical metaphor. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(1), 30–34.
Pimm, D. (1991). Communicating mathematically. In K. Durkin & B. Shire (Eds.), Language in mathematical education: Research and practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Pimm, D. (1995). Symbols and meanings in school mathematics. London: Routledge.
Rotman, B. (1987). Signifying nothing: The semiotics of zero. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan Press.
Seife, C. (2000). Zero: Biography of a dangerous idea. New York: Penguin.
Sfard, A. (2000). On reform movement and the limits of mathematical discourse. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(3), 157–189.
Smith, D. E. (1951). History of mathematics, Vol. I. New York: Dover Publications.
Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., & Silver, E. A. (1999). The development of professional developers: Learning to assist teachers in new settings in new ways. Harvard Educational Review, 69(3), 237–269.
Tobias, S. (1994). Overcoming math anxiety. New York: Norton.
Usiskin, Z. (1996). Mathematics as a language. In P. C. Elliot & M. J. Kenney (Eds.), Communication in mathematics, K-12 and beyond. Reston, VA: NCTM.
About this article
Cite this article
Sterenberg, G. Investigating teachers’ images of mathematics. J Math Teacher Educ 11, 89–105 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9062-8