Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The multimedia case as a tool for professional development: an analysis of online and face-to-face interaction among mathematics pre-service teachers, in-service teachers, mathematicians, and mathematics teacher educators

Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education volume 10, pages 95–121 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

In this study, we consider the potential of multimedia cases as tools for teacher professional development. Specifically, we examined online and face-to-face discussions that occurred within groups composed of pre-service mathematics teachers, in-service mathematics teachers, mathematicians, and mathematics teacher educators. Discussions within these heterogeneous groups tended to focus on issues of classroom implementation of the tasks shown in the multimedia case. Secondary foci of discussion included task characteristics and appropriateness of tasks for engaging students in thinking about mathematical concepts and processes. Analysis of contributions to discussions across group member type revealed differences that suggest that the variety of backgrounds and experiences of group members can blend in ways that support rich and critical discussions of mathematics, teaching, and learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  • Abell, S. K., & Cennamo, K. S. (2004). Videocases in elementary science teacher preparation. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education. Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 10, pp. 103–130). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond, & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, C. (1998). Mathematics teaching cases as a catalyst for informed strategic inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, C. S., & Tyson, P. A. (1999). Case methods and teacher change: Shifting authority to build autonomy. In M. A. Lundeberg, B. B. Levin, & H. L. Harrington (Eds.), Who learns what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases (pp. 53–69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J., & Humphreys, K. (2005). Connecting mathematical ideas: Middle school video cases to support teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, J. S., Doerr, H. M., Masingila, J. O., & McClain, K. (2000). Multimedia case studies for teacher development: Case II: Making weighty decisions (Version 1.0) [CD-Rom]. New York: Syracuse University.

  • Brophy, J. (Ed.) (2004). Using video in teacher education. Advances in research on teaching (vol. 10.) Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Empson, S. B. (1999). Children’s mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, K. (1992). Toward a cognitive conception of classroom management: A case of teacher comprehension. In J. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education (pp. 111–130). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, K. (1994). The case against thinking like a teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 45(3), 236–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, K., & Mason, C. (2000). Collaborative dialogue: A web-based, multimedia case study shared among geographically disparate social studies educators. Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, USA, 11, 2003–2005.

  • Doerr, H. M., & Thompson, T. (2004). Understanding teacher educators and their pre-service teachers through multi-media case studies of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 175–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffree, F., & Oonk, W. (2001). Digitizing real teaching practice for teacher education programmes: The MILE approach. In F. Lin, & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 111–146). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, E., & Barron, L. (1990). Using hypermedia to improve the preparation of elementary teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, G. E. (1996). Using the case method to translate theory into practice. In J. A. Colbert, P. Desberg, & K. Trimbel (Eds.), The case for education: Contemporary approaches for using case methods (pp. 57–78). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., & Collopy, R. M. B. (2002). What might teachers learn?: An evaluation of the potential opportunities to learn in videocase: Module one draft materials (Technical Report 1). San Diego, CA: San Diego State University.

  • Krainer, K. (1993). Powerful tasks: A contribution to a high level of acting and reflecting in mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(1), 65–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M., & Ball, D. (1998). Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. B. (1995). Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experience in teachers’ thinking about cases. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. B. (1997). The influence of context in case-based teaching: Personal dilemmas, moral issues, or real changes in teachers’ thinking? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Levin, B. B., & Irwin, D. M. (1995). Discussion-based teaching as faculty development: What teachers learn from case discussions versus discussions based on teacher generated issues. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

  • Lewis, C. C., & Tsuchida, I. (1998). A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river: How research lessons improve Japanese education. American Educator, 22(4), 12–17, 50–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundeberg, M. A., & Scheurman, G. (1997). Looking twice means seeing more: Developing pedagogical knowledge through case analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(8), 783–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masingila, J. O., & Doerr, H. M. (2002). Understanding pre-service teachers’ emerging practices through their analyses of a multimedia case study of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 235–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAninch, A. R. (1993). Teacher thinking and the case method: Theory and future directions. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moje, E. B., Remillard, J. T., Southerland, S., & Wade, S. E. (1999). Researching case pedagogies to inform our teaching. In M. A. Lundeberg, B. B. Levin, & H. L. Harrington (Eds.), Who learns what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases (pp. 73–94). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokros, J., Russell, S. J., & Economopoulos, K. (1995). Beyond arithmetic: Changing mathematics in the elementary school. Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oonk, W., Goffree, F., & Verloop, N. (2004). For the enrichment of practical knowledge: Good practice and useful theory for future primary teachers. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education. Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 10, pp.103–130). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, J. (2001). Investigating mathematics and learning to teach mathematics. In F. Lin, & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 53–72). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seago, N. (2004). Using video as an object of inquiry for mathematics teaching and learning. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education in research on teaching (Vol. 10, pp. 259–286). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seago, N., Mumme, J., & Branca, N. (2004). Learning and teaching linear functions: Videocases for mathematics professional development. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, J. H. (Ed.) (1992). Case methods in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Education Research Journal, 33, 455–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G., & Bird, T. (1992). Teacher education and the case idea. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 18, pp. 457–521). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talley, S. (2002). Pepperdine presents: An online video case studies series to use throughout a teacher education program. Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, USA, 13, 2539.

  • van Es, E., & Sherin, M. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V., & Toma, C. (1995). Discourse and learning in the classroom: A sociocultural approach. In L. P. Steffe, & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 159–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, O., & Leikin, R. (2004). Professional development of mathematics teacher educators: Growth through practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was funded by the Lucent Technologies Foundation and a National Science Foundation grant (#9980081) awarded to Catherine Brown (Indiana University). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Lucent Technologies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mathematics, University of Arizona, 617 N. Santa Rita Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA

    Rebecca McGraw

  2. Education, Appalachian State University, 318D Edwin Duncan Hall, Boone, NC, 28608, USA

    Kathleen Lynch

  3. Education, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, 06531, Turkey

    Yusuf Koc

  4. Education, Indiana University, 201 N. Rose Ave., Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA

    Ayfer Budak & Catherine A. Brown

Authors
  1. Rebecca McGraw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kathleen Lynch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yusuf Koc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ayfer Budak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Catherine A. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca McGraw.

Appendix: Prompts for online discussions

Appendix: Prompts for online discussions

Discussion prompts for the first online discussion (sneaker problem) were taken from the facilitator’s guide to Making Weighty Decisions (Bowers et al., 2000):

  • What mathematical thinking took place when the students needed to combine six lists into one ranked list? Is this important mathematics in the larger scheme of mathematics?

  • Analyze the conversation that Group 2 had with the teacher. How did they approach the task of combining the lists before the teacher started to work with them? How about after she left? Do you think the teacher understood what they were doing? What else could she have done?

  • Look at the questions the teacher asked the students in Group 2 and Group 3 about their systems. What do you think she wanted to accomplish with these questions? Find two similar instances where the teacher asked students questions. Can you think of additional methods to accomplish her goal?

  • How did the teacher use anticipated student responses to help her plan this lesson? Do you think this was effective?

Discussion prompts for the second online discussion (the crime statistics problem). The second prompt was taken from the facilitator’s guide to Making Weighty Decisions (Bowers et al., 2000):

  • What other comments, questions, or concerns do you have about Day Two of ‘Making Weighty Decisions’?

  • Look at the interactions between the teacher and the students in each of the groups. What do you think were the teacher’s goals in her interactions with each of the four groups?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McGraw, R., Lynch, K., Koc, Y. et al. The multimedia case as a tool for professional development: an analysis of online and face-to-face interaction among mathematics pre-service teachers, in-service teachers, mathematicians, and mathematics teacher educators. J Math Teacher Educ 10, 95–121 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9030-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9030-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation