Skip to main content

The Impact of a Professional Development Program on Student Achievement in Grade 6 Mathematics

Abstract

Grade 6 teachers (N = 106) in one school district were randomly assigned to early or late professional development (PD) groups. The program focused on reform communication and incorporated principles of effective PD recommended by researchers, although the duration of the treatment was modest (one full day and four after school sessions over a ten-week period). At the post-test, there were no statistically significant differences in student achievement. Although it could be argued that the result demonstrates that PD resources should be redirected to more intensive PD delivered over longer periods, we claimed that the PD was assessed prematurely. After the completion of the study, the external assessments administered by the province showed a significant increase in student achievement from one year to the next involving both the early and late treatment groups, an increase that was not found for the same students in other subjects. The study had high ecological validity: it was delivered by district curriculum staff to all grade 6 teachers, volunteers and conscripts alike. The cost to the district, less than CAN$14 [9 euros] per student, was comparable to the modest expenditures typically available for professional development in Canadian school districts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Borko H., Davinroy K. H., Bliem C. L., Cumbo K. B. (2000). Exploring and supporting teacher change: Two third-grade teachers’ experience in a mathematics and literacy staff development project. Elementary School Journal 100(4):273–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossé M. J. (1995). The NCTM Standards in light of the New Math movement: A warning!. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 14:171–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., Blanton, M. L., Cobb, P., Franke, M. L., Kaput, J., & McClain, K. (2004). Scaling up innovative practices in mathematics and science. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science

  • Carpenter T. P., Fennema E., Peterson P. L., Chiang C.-P., Loef M. (1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal 26(4):499–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H.-T. (2005). Practical program evaluation: Assessing and improving planning, implementation, and effectiveness. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D. K., Hill H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record 102(2):294–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed., Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer J.D., Gerretson H., Lassak M. (2003). What teachers take from professional development: Cases and implications. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 6(4):331–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke M. L., Carpenter T. P., Levi L., Fennema E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal 38(3):653–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Haladyna T., Nolan S., Haas N. (1991). Raising standardized achievement scores and the origins of test score pollution. Educational Researcher 20(5):2–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton L. S., McCaffrey D. F., Stecher B. M., Klein S. P., Robyn A., Bugliari D. (2003). Studying large-scale reforms of instructional practice: An example from mathematics and science. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 25(1):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill H. C. (2004). Professional development standards and practices in elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal 104(3): 215–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman D., Thomas K. (2003). Relationship between professional development, teachers’ instructional practices, and the achievement of students in Science and Mathmatics. School Science and Mathematics 103(8): 378–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Killion J. (1998). Scaling the elusive summit. Journal of Staff Development 19(4):12–16

    Google Scholar 

  • King A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal 31(2):338–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M. S. (1997). Between systemic reforms and the mathematics and science classroom: The dynamics of innovation, implementation, and professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(2), 227–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn R. L., Haug C. (2002). Stability of school-building accountability scores and gains. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24(4):29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley C., Kaplan A., Middleton M., Maehr M. L., Urdan T., Anderman L. H., Anderman E., Roeser R. (1998). The development and validation of scales assessing students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology 23:113–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira C. Q. (1997). Between the academic mathematics and the mathematics education worlds. European Journal of Teacher Education 20(2):171–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research 66(4):543–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard J. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers’ learning? Two fourth-grade teachers’ use of a new textbook. Elementary School Journal 100(4):331–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reys B. J., Reys R. E., Barnes D., Beem J., Papick I. (1997). Collaborative curriculum investigation as a vehicle for teacher enhancement and mathematics curriculum reform. School Science and Mathematics 87(5):253–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Riordan J. E., Noyce P. E. (2001). The impact of two Standards-Based curricula on student achievement in Massachusetts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 32(4):368–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross J. A. (1995). Students explaining solutions in student-directed groups: Cooperative learning and reform in mathematics education. School Science and Mathematics 95(8):411–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. A. (2004). Student and teacher effects of professional development for grade 6 mathematics teachers. Interim report to the Ontario Ministry of Education and Training. Peterborough, ON: OISE/UT Trent Valley Centre

  • Ross, J. A., & Bruce, C. (in press). Self-assessment and professional growth: The case of a grade 8 mathematics teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education

  • Ross J. A., Hogaboam-Gray A., McDougall D., Le Sage A. (2003). A survey measuring implementation of mathematics education reform by elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education 34(4):344–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross J. A., Hogaboam-Gray A., Rolheiser C. (2002). Student self-evaluation in grade 5–6 mathematics: Effects on problem solving achievement. Educational Assessment 8(1):43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross J. A., McDougall D., Hogaboam-Gray A. (2002). Research on reform in mathematics education, 1993–2000. Alberta Journal of Educational Research 48(2):122–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxe G. B., Gearhart M., Nasir N. S. (2001). Enhancing students’ understanding of mathematics: A study of three contrasting approaches to professional support. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 4(1):55–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer W. D., Swanson G., Bené N., Newberry G. (2001). Effects of teacher knowledge of rubrics on student achievement in four content areas. Applied Measurement in Education 14(2):151–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard L. A., Flexer R. J., Hiebert E. H., Marion S. F., Mayfield V., Weston T. J. (1996). Effects of introducing classroom performance assessments on student learning. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 15(3):7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon M. A., Schifter D. (1993). Toward a constructivist perspective: The impact of a mathematics teacher inservice program on students. Educational Studies in Mathematics 25:331–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg R. M., Empson S. B., Carpenter T. P. (2004). Inquiry into children’s mathematical thinking as a means to teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 7(3):237–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stemler, S. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(4), Retrieved March 1, 2004 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=4

  • Supovitz J. A., Turner H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(9):963–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner J. C., Meyer D. K., Midgley C., Patrick H. (2003). Teachers’ discourse and sixth graders’ reported affect and achievement behaviors in two high-mastery/high-performance mathematics classrooms. Elementary School Journal 103(4):357–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenglinsky, H. (2002). How schools matter: The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(12), Downloaded from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n12/ December 6, 2005

  • Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., & Rodriguez, D. (1998). The development of children’s motivation in school contexts. In P. D. Pearson & A. Iran-Nejad, A. (Eds.), Review of research in education, vol 23 (pp. 73–118). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association

  • Wilson, S. M. & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education, Vol. 24, (pp 173–210). Washington: American Educational Research Association

  • Zaslavsky O., Leikin R. (2004). Professional development of mathematics teacher educators: Growth through practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 7(1):5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John A. Ross.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1 Chronology of the Study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ross, J.A., Hogaboam-Gray, A. & Bruce, C. The Impact of a Professional Development Program on Student Achievement in Grade 6 Mathematics. J Math Teacher Educ 9, 1–27 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-006-9020-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-006-9020-x

Keywords

  • mathematics
  • student achievement
  • professional development
  • grade 6