Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

, Volume 9, Issue 6, pp 1–27 | Cite as

The Impact of a Professional Development Program on Student Achievement in Grade 6 Mathematics

  • John A. Ross
  • Anne Hogaboam-Gray
  • Chatherine Bruce
Article

Abstract

Grade 6 teachers (N = 106) in one school district were randomly assigned to early or late professional development (PD) groups. The program focused on reform communication and incorporated principles of effective PD recommended by researchers, although the duration of the treatment was modest (one full day and four after school sessions over a ten-week period). At the post-test, there were no statistically significant differences in student achievement. Although it could be argued that the result demonstrates that PD resources should be redirected to more intensive PD delivered over longer periods, we claimed that the PD was assessed prematurely. After the completion of the study, the external assessments administered by the province showed a significant increase in student achievement from one year to the next involving both the early and late treatment groups, an increase that was not found for the same students in other subjects. The study had high ecological validity: it was delivered by district curriculum staff to all grade 6 teachers, volunteers and conscripts alike. The cost to the district, less than CAN$14 [9 euros] per student, was comparable to the modest expenditures typically available for professional development in Canadian school districts.

Keywords

mathematics student achievement professional development grade 6 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Borko H., Davinroy K. H., Bliem C. L., Cumbo K. B. (2000). Exploring and supporting teacher change: Two third-grade teachers’ experience in a mathematics and literacy staff development project. Elementary School Journal 100(4):273–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bossé M. J. (1995). The NCTM Standards in light of the New Math movement: A warning!. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 14:171–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carpenter, T. P., Blanton, M. L., Cobb, P., Franke, M. L., Kaput, J., & McClain, K. (2004). Scaling up innovative practices in mathematics and science. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and ScienceGoogle Scholar
  4. Carpenter T. P., Fennema E., Peterson P. L., Chiang C.-P., Loef M. (1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal 26(4):499–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen H.-T. (2005). Practical program evaluation: Assessing and improving planning, implementation, and effectiveness. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen D. K., Hill H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record 102(2):294–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed., Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJGoogle Scholar
  8. Farmer J.D., Gerretson H., Lassak M. (2003). What teachers take from professional development: Cases and implications. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 6(4):331–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Franke M. L., Carpenter T. P., Levi L., Fennema E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal 38(3):653–690Google Scholar
  10. Haladyna T., Nolan S., Haas N. (1991). Raising standardized achievement scores and the origins of test score pollution. Educational Researcher 20(5):2–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamilton L. S., McCaffrey D. F., Stecher B. M., Klein S. P., Robyn A., Bugliari D. (2003). Studying large-scale reforms of instructional practice: An example from mathematics and science. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 25(1):1–29Google Scholar
  12. Hill H. C. (2004). Professional development standards and practices in elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal 104(3): 215–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huffman D., Thomas K. (2003). Relationship between professional development, teachers’ instructional practices, and the achievement of students in Science and Mathmatics. School Science and Mathematics 103(8): 378–387Google Scholar
  14. Killion J. (1998). Scaling the elusive summit. Journal of Staff Development 19(4):12–16Google Scholar
  15. King A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal 31(2):338–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Knapp, M. S. (1997). Between systemic reforms and the mathematics and science classroom: The dynamics of innovation, implementation, and professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(2), 227–266Google Scholar
  17. Linn R. L., Haug C. (2002). Stability of school-building accountability scores and gains. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24(4):29–36Google Scholar
  18. Midgley C., Kaplan A., Middleton M., Maehr M. L., Urdan T., Anderman L. H., Anderman E., Roeser R. (1998). The development and validation of scales assessing students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology 23:113–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moreira C. Q. (1997). Between the academic mathematics and the mathematics education worlds. European Journal of Teacher Education 20(2):171–189Google Scholar
  20. Pajares F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research 66(4):543–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Remillard J. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers’ learning? Two fourth-grade teachers’ use of a new textbook. Elementary School Journal 100(4):331–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reys B. J., Reys R. E., Barnes D., Beem J., Papick I. (1997). Collaborative curriculum investigation as a vehicle for teacher enhancement and mathematics curriculum reform. School Science and Mathematics 87(5):253–259Google Scholar
  23. Riordan J. E., Noyce P. E. (2001). The impact of two Standards-Based curricula on student achievement in Massachusetts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 32(4):368–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ross J. A. (1995). Students explaining solutions in student-directed groups: Cooperative learning and reform in mathematics education. School Science and Mathematics 95(8):411–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ross, J. A. (2004). Student and teacher effects of professional development for grade 6 mathematics teachers. Interim report to the Ontario Ministry of Education and Training. Peterborough, ON: OISE/UT Trent Valley CentreGoogle Scholar
  26. Ross, J. A., & Bruce, C. (in press). Self-assessment and professional growth: The case of a grade 8 mathematics teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education Google Scholar
  27. Ross J. A., Hogaboam-Gray A., McDougall D., Le Sage A. (2003). A survey measuring implementation of mathematics education reform by elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education 34(4):344–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ross J. A., Hogaboam-Gray A., Rolheiser C. (2002). Student self-evaluation in grade 5–6 mathematics: Effects on problem solving achievement. Educational Assessment 8(1):43–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ross J. A., McDougall D., Hogaboam-Gray A. (2002). Research on reform in mathematics education, 1993–2000. Alberta Journal of Educational Research 48(2):122–138Google Scholar
  30. Saxe G. B., Gearhart M., Nasir N. S. (2001). Enhancing students’ understanding of mathematics: A study of three contrasting approaches to professional support. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 4(1):55–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schafer W. D., Swanson G., Bené N., Newberry G. (2001). Effects of teacher knowledge of rubrics on student achievement in four content areas. Applied Measurement in Education 14(2):151–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shepard L. A., Flexer R. J., Hiebert E. H., Marion S. F., Mayfield V., Weston T. J. (1996). Effects of introducing classroom performance assessments on student learning. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 15(3):7–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simon M. A., Schifter D. (1993). Toward a constructivist perspective: The impact of a mathematics teacher inservice program on students. Educational Studies in Mathematics 25:331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Steinberg R. M., Empson S. B., Carpenter T. P. (2004). Inquiry into children’s mathematical thinking as a means to teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 7(3):237–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stemler, S. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(4), Retrieved March 1, 2004 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=4Google Scholar
  36. Supovitz J. A., Turner H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(9):963–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Turner J. C., Meyer D. K., Midgley C., Patrick H. (2003). Teachers’ discourse and sixth graders’ reported affect and achievement behaviors in two high-mastery/high-performance mathematics classrooms. Elementary School Journal 103(4):357–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wenglinsky, H. (2002). How schools matter: The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(12), Downloaded from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n12/ December 6, 2005Google Scholar
  39. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., & Rodriguez, D. (1998). The development of children’s motivation in school contexts. In P. D. Pearson & A. Iran-Nejad, A. (Eds.), Review of research in education, vol 23 (pp. 73–118). Washington, DC: American Educational Research AssociationGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilson, S. M. & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education, Vol. 24, (pp 173–210). Washington: American Educational Research AssociationGoogle Scholar
  41. Zaslavsky O., Leikin R. (2004). Professional development of mathematics teacher educators: Growth through practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 7(1):5–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • John A. Ross
    • 1
  • Anne Hogaboam-Gray
    • 1
  • Chatherine Bruce
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Curriculum, Teaching & LearningUniversity of TorontoPeterboroughCanada

Personalised recommendations