Advertisement

Novel chitosan derivative based composite scaffolds with enhanced angiogenesis; potential candidates for healing chronic non-healing wounds

  • Muhammad Rizwan
  • Rosiyah YahyaEmail author
  • Aziz Hassan
  • Muhammad Yar
  • Adyani Azizah Abd Halim
  • Anis Rageh Al-Maleki
  • Lubna Shahzadi
  • Waliya Zubairi
Tissue Engineering Constructs and Cell Substrates Original Research
  • 87 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Tissue Engineering Constructs and Cell Substrates

Abstract

The success of wound healing depends upon the proper growth of vascular system in time in the damaged tissues. Poor blood supply to wounded tissues or tissue engineered grafts leads to the failure of wound healing or rejection of grafts. In present paper, we report the synthesis of novel organosoluble and pro-angiogenic chitosan derivative (CSD) by the reaction of chitosan with 1,3-dimethylbarbituric acid and triethylorthoformate (TEOF). The synthesized material was characterized by FTIR and 13C-NMR to confirm the incorporated functional groups and new covalent connectivities. Biodegradability of the synthesized chitosan derivative was tested in the presence of lysozyme and was found to be comparable with CS. The cytotoxicity and apoptosis effect of new derivative was determined against gastric adenocarcinoma (AGS) cells and was found to be non-toxic. The CSD was found to be soluble in majority of organic solvents. It was blended with polycaprolactone (PCL) to form composite scaffolds. From an ex ovo CAM assay, it was noted that CSD stimulated the angiogenesis.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to the financial grants from Universiti Malaya (PG335-2016A) and Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia (FP052-2016).

References

  1. 1.
    Adair TH, Montani J-P, Angiogenesis, colloquium series on integrated systems physiology: from molecule to function. Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences; London, United Kindom, 2010.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yar M, Gigliobianco G, Shahzadi L, Dew L, Siddiqi SA, Khan AF et al. Production of chitosan PVA PCL hydrogels to bind heparin and induce angiogenesis. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomat. 2016;65:466–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Augustine R, Dominic EA, Reju I, Kaimal B, Kalarikkal N, Thomas S. Investigation of angiogenesis and its mechanism using zinc oxide nanoparticle-loaded electrospun tissue engineering scaffolds. RSC Adv. 2014;4:51528–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Augustine R, Nethi SK, Kalarikkal N, Thomas S, Patra CR. Electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds embedded with europium hydroxide nanorods (EHNs) with enhanced vascularization and cell proliferation for tissue engineering applications. J Mater Chem B. 2017;5:4660–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rizwan M, Yahya R, Hassan A, Yar M, Azzahari A, Selvanathan V et al. pH sensitive hydrogels in drug delivery: brief history, properties, swelling, and release mechanism, material selection and applications. Polymers. 2017;9:137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhao-Sheng C, Yue-Ming S, Chun-Sheng Y, Xue-Mei Z. Preparation, characterization, and antibacterial activities of para-biguanidinyl benzoyl chitosan hydrochloride. J Appl Polym Sci. 2012;125:1146–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bashir S, Teo YY, Ramesh S, Ramesh K, Khan AA. N-succinyl chitosan preparation, characterization, properties and biomedical applications: a state of the art review. Rev Chem Eng. 2015;31:563–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nishimura S, Kohgo O, Kurita K, Kuzuhara H. Chemospecific manipulations of a rigid polysaccharide: syntheses of novel chitosan derivatives with excellent solubility in common organic solvents by regioselective chemical modifications. Macromolecules. 1991;24:4745–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bertoni F, Barbani N, Giusti P, Ciardelli G. Transglutaminase reactivity with gelatine: perspective applications in tissue engineering. Biotechnol Lett. 2006;28:697–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bidgoli H, Zamani A, Taherzadeh MJ. Effect of carboxymethylation conditions on the water-binding capacity of chitosan-based superabsorbents. Carbohydr Res. 2010;345:2683–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bashir S, Teo YY, Ramesh S, Ramesh K. Physico-chemical characterization of pH-sensitive N-Succinyl chitosan-g-poly (acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) hydrogels and in vitro drug release studies. Polym Degrad Stab. 2017;139:38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huacai G, Wan P, Dengke L. Graft copolymerization of chitosan with acrylic acid under microwave irradiation and its water absorbency. Carbohydrate Polym. 2006;66:372–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee D, Quan ZS, Lu C, Jeong JA, Song C, Song M-S et al. Preparation and physical properties of chitosan benzoic acid derivatives using a phosphoryl mixed anhydride system. Molecules. 2012;17:2231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jayakumar R, Nwe N, Tokura S, Tamura H. Sulfated chitin and chitosan as novel biomaterials. Int J Biol Macromol. 2007;40:175–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kahya N. Water soluble chitosan derivatives and their biological activities: a review, Polym Sci.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2471-9935.100043.
  16. 16.
    Rasheed T, Bilal M, Abu-Thabit NY, Iqbal HMN. 3 - The smart chemistry of stimuli-responsive polymeric carriers for target drug delivery applications. In: Makhlouf ASH, Abu-Thabit NY, (eds). Stimuli responsive polymeric nanocarriers for drug delivery applications, Vol 1. Woodhead Publishing; Cambridge, United Kindom, 2018, p. 61–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Iqbal HMN, Keshavarz T. 14 - Bioinspired polymeric carriers for drug delivery applications. In: Makhlouf ASH, Abu-Thabit NY, (eds). Stimuli responsive polymeric nanocarriers for drug delivery applications, Vol 1. Woodhead Publishing; Cambridge, United Kindom, 2018, p. 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raza A, Hayat U, Rasheed T, Bilal M, Iqbal HMN. Redox-responsive nano-carriers as tumor-targeted drug delivery systems. Eur J Med Chem. 2018;157:705–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ma G, Yang D, Kennedy JF, Nie J. Synthesize and characterization of organic-soluble acylated chitosan. Carbohydrate Polym. 2009;75:390–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang P, Cao M. Preparation of a novel organo-soluble chitosan grafted polycaprolactone copolymer for drug delivery. Int J Biol Macromol. 2014;65:21–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Renbutsu E, Hirose M, Omura Y, Nakatsubo F, Okamura Y, Okamoto Y et al. Preparation and biocompatibility of novel UV-curable chitosan derivatives. Biomacromolecules. 2005;6:2385–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ulery BD, Nair LS, Laurencin CT. Biomedical applications of biodegradable polymers. J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys. 2011;49:832–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Woodruff MA, Hutmacher DW. The return of a forgotten polymer—polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci. 2010;35:1217–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aiba S-i. Studies on chitosan: 4. Lysozymic hydrolysis of partially N-acetylated chitosans. Int J Biol Macromol. 1992;14:225–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nordtveit RJ, Vårum KM, Smidsrød O. Degradation of fully water-soluble, partially N-acetylated chitosans with lysozyme. Carbohydrate Polym. 1994;23:253–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nordtveit RJ, Vårum KM, Smidsrød O. Degradation of partially N-acetylated chitosans with hen egg white and human lysozyme. Carbohydrate Polym. 1996;29:163–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Han T, Nwe N, Furuike T, Tokura S, Tamura H. Methods of N-acetylated chitosan scaffolds and its in-vitro biodegradation by lysozyme. J Biomed Sci Eng. 2012;5:15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zimoch-Korzycka A, Kulig D, Jarmoluk A, Marycz K, Matuszczak W. Study of Enzymatically treated alginate/chitosan hydrosols in sponges formation process. Polymers. 2016;8:8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cohen JS. Proton magnetic resonance studies of human lysozyme. Nature. 1969;223:43–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Banjard S, Blake C, Swan I. Lsozyme. In: Osserman EF, Canfield RE, Beychok S, editors. New York; Academic Press Inc. 1974. p. 71–9.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vårum KM, Kristiansen Holme H, Izume M, Torger Stokke B, Smidsrød O. Determination of enzymatic hydrolysis specificity of partially N-acetylated chitosans. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) - Gen Subj. 1996;1291:5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Huopalahti R, Anton M, López-Fandiño R, Schade R, Bioactive egg compounds. Springer; 2007. p. 33–42.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rizwan M, Yahya R, Hassan A, Yar M, Anita Omar R, Azari P et al. Synthesis of a novel organosoluble, biocompatible, and antibacterial chitosan derivative for biomedical applications. J Appl Polym Sci. 2018;135:45905–n/a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bernfeld P. Enzymes of starch degradation and synthesis. In: Nord F. F (ed) Advances in enzymology and related areas of molecular biology. United States: John Wiley & Sons; 1951.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Halim AAA, Feroz SR, Tayyab S. Does recovery in the spectral characteristics of GdnHCl-denatured bacillus licheniformis α-amylase due to added calcium point towards protein stabilization? Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2013;77:87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ahtzaz S, Nasir M, Shahzadi L, Amir W, Anjum A, Arshad R et al. A study on the effect of zinc oxide and zinc peroxide nanoparticles to enhance angiogenesis-pro-angiogenic grafts for tissue regeneration applications. Mater Des. 2017;132:409–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Khan AS, Hussain AN, Sidra L, Sarfraz Z, Khalid H, Khan M et al. Fabrication and in vivo evaluation of hydroxyapatite/carbon nanotube electrospun fibers for biomedical/dental application. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2017;80:387–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Costa-Júnior ES, Barbosa-Stancioli EF, Mansur AAP, Vasconcelos WL, Mansur HS. Preparation and characterization of chitosan/poly(vinyl alcohol) chemically crosslinked blends for biomedical applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2009;76:472–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Heux L, Brugnerotto J, Desbrières J, Versali MF, Rinaudo M. Solid state NMR for determination of degree of acetylation of chitin and chitosan. Biomacromolecules. 2000;1:746–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Xu R, Aotegen B, Zhong Z Synthesis, characterization and biological activity of C6-Schiff bases derivatives of chitosan. Int J Biol Macromol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ma G, Qian B, Yang J, Hu C, Nie J. Synthesis and properties of photosensitive chitosan derivatives(1). Int J Biol Macromol. 2010;46:558–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bae IH, Jang WG, Lim HP, Park SW, Lee KM, Park YJ et al. Morphological property and in vitro enzymatic degradation of modified chitosan as a scaffold. Macromol Res. 2011;19:1250–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Aleem AR, Shahzadi L, Alvi F, Khan AF, Chaudhry AA, ur Rehman I et al. Thyroxin releasing chitosan/collagen based smart hydrogels to stimulate neovascularization. Mater Des. 2017;133:416–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yar M, Farooq A, Shahzadi L, Khan AS, Mahmood N, Rauf A et al. Novel meloxicam releasing electrospun polymer/ceramic reinforced biodegradable membranes for periodontal regeneration applications. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2016;64:148–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jamal A, Shahzadi L, Ahtzaz S, Zahid S, Chaudhry AA, ur Rehman I et al. Identification of anti-cancer potential of doxazocin: loading into chitosan based biodegradable hydrogels for on-site delivery to treat cervical cancer. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2018;82:102–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shahzadi L, Yar M, Jamal A, Siddiqi SA, Chaudhry AA, Zahid S et al. Triethyl orthoformate covalently cross-linked chitosan-(poly vinyl) alcohol based biodegradable scaffolds with heparin-binding ability for promoting neovascularisation. J Biomater Appl. 2016;31:582–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yar M, Shahzad S, Siddiqi SA, Mahmood N, Rauf A, Anwar MS et al. Triethyl orthoformate mediated a novel crosslinking method for the preparation of hydrogels for tissue engineering applications: characterization and in vitro cytocompatibility analysis. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2015;56:154–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rizwan M, Yahya R, Hassan A, Yar M, Anita Omar R, Azari P et al. Synthesis of a novel organosoluble, biocompatible, and antibacterial chitosan derivative for biomedical applications. J Appl Polym Sci. 2018;135:45905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bae I-H, Jang WG, Lim H-P, Park S-W, Lee K-M, Park Y-J et al. Morphological property and in vitro enzymatic degradation of modified chitosan as a scaffold. Macromol Res. 2011;19:1250–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kim J-A, Ahn B-N, Kong C-S, Kim S-K. Chitooligomers inhibit UV-A-induced photoaging of skin by regulating TGF-β/Smad signaling cascade. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;88:490–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zhang H, Jia X, Han F, Zhao J, Zhao Y, Fan Y et al. Dual-delivery of VEGF and PDGF by double-layered electrospun membranes for blood vessel regeneration. Biomaterials. 2013;34:2202–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Rizwan
    • 1
  • Rosiyah Yahya
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aziz Hassan
    • 1
  • Muhammad Yar
    • 2
  • Adyani Azizah Abd Halim
    • 3
  • Anis Rageh Al-Maleki
    • 4
  • Lubna Shahzadi
    • 2
  • Waliya Zubairi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversiti MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Interdisciplinary Research Center in Biomedical MaterialsCOMSATS UniversityLahorePakistan
  3. 3.Department of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, Faculty of DentistryUniversiti MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  4. 4.Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations