Collagen-based bioinks for hard tissue engineering applications: a comprehensive review
- 547 Downloads
In the last few years, additive manufacturing (AM) has been gaining great interest in the fabrication of complex structures for soft-to-hard tissues regeneration, with tailored porosity, and boosted structural, mechanical, and biological properties. 3D printing is one of the most known AM techniques in the field of biofabrication of tissues and organs. This technique opened up opportunities over the conventional ones, with the capability of creating replicable, customized, and functional structures that can ultimately promote effectively different tissues regeneration. The uppermost component of 3D printing is the bioink, i.e. a mixture of biomaterials that can also been laden with different cell types, and bioactive molecules. Important factors of the fabrication process include printing fidelity, stability, time, shear-thinning properties, mechanical strength and elasticity, as well as cell encapsulation and cell-compatible conditions. Collagen-based materials have been recognized as a promising choice to accomplish an ideal mimetic bioink for regeneration of several tissues with high cell-activating properties. This review presents the state-of-art of the current achievements on 3D printing using collagen-based materials for hard tissue engineering, particularly on the development of scaffolds for bone and cartilage repair/regeneration. The ultimate aim is to shed light on the requirements to successfully print collagen-based inks and the most relevant properties exhibited by the so fabricated scaffolds. In this regard, the adequate bioprinting parameters are addressed, as well as the main materials properties, namely physicochemical and mechanical properties, cell compatibility and commercial availability, covering hydrogels, microcarriers and decellularized matrix components. Furthermore, the fabrication of these bioinks with and without cells used in inkjet printing, laser-assisted printing, and direct in writing technologies are also overviewed. Finally, some future perspectives of novel bioinks are given.
Financial support from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) through grant agreement ERC-2012-ADG 20120216-321266 (ERC Advanced Grant ComplexiTE), from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) to the BiogenInk project (M-ERA-NET2/0022/2016) and from North of Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020) to the projects FROnTHERA (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000023) and NORTE-08-5369-F SE-000044, under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), is greatly acknowledged. The authors are grateful for the FCT distinction attributed to J.M.O. (IF/01285/2015).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z, Gou J, Hui D. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective. Compos Part B: Eng. 2017;110:442–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M. Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials. 2016;76:321–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Bellis SL. Advantages of RGD peptides for directing cell association with biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2011;32(18):4205–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.029. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.San Antonio J, Persikov A, Stevens J, Jacenko O, Orgel J. Collagen biology meets medical device technology: current reality, future dreams. XXXIII IULTCS Congress November, 24–27th, 2015 Novo Hamburgo/Brazil.Google Scholar
- 20.Bellis SL. Advantages of RGD peptides for directing cell association with biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2011;32(18):4205–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.029. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Wlodarczyk-Biegun MK, Del Campo A. 3D bioprinting of structural proteins. Biomaterials. 2017;134:180–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.04.019. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Duarte Campos DF, Blaeser A, Korsten A, Neuss S, Jakel J, Vogt M, et al. The stiffness and structure of three-dimensional printed hydrogels direct the differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells toward adipogenic and osteogenic lineages. Tissue Eng Part A. 2015;21(3-4):740–56. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0231. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Gopinathan J, Noh I. Recent trends in bioinks for 3D printing. Biomater. Res. 2018;22:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-018-0122-1.
- 34.Jang J, Park JY, Gao G, Cho D-W. Biomaterials-based 3D cell printing for next-generation therapeutics and diagnostics. Biomaterials. 2018;156:88–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.030. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Fedorovich NE, Schuurman W, Wijnberg HM, Prins HJ, van Weeren PR, Malda J, et al. Biofabrication of osteochondral tissue equivalents by printing topologically defined, cell-laden hydrogel scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2012;18(1):33–44. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2011.0060. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Diamantides N, Wang L, Pruiksma T, Siemiatkoski J, Dugopolski C, Shortkroff S, et al. Correlating rheological properties and printability of collagen bioinks: the effects of riboflavin photocrosslinking and pH. Biofabrication. 2017;9(3):034102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa780f. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Billiet T, Gevaert E, De Schryver T, Cornelissen M, Dubruel P. The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability. Biomaterials. 2014;35(1):49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.Lee H, Kim Y, Kim S, Kim G. Mineralized biomimetic collagen/alginate/silica composite scaffolds fabricated by a low-temperature bio-plotting process for hard tissue regeneration: fabrication, characterisation and in vitro cellular activities. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2(35):5785–98. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TB00931B. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 51.Das S, Pati F, Choi YJ, Rijal G, Shim JH, Kim SW, et al. Bioprintable, cell-laden silk fibroin-gelatin hydrogel supporting multilineage differentiation of stem cells for fabrication of three-dimensional tissue constructs. Acta Biomater. 2015;11:233–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.023. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 54.Shim JH, Jang KM, Hahn SK, Park JY, Jung H, Oh K, et al. Three-dimensional bioprinting of multilayered constructs containing human mesenchymal stromal cells for osteochondral tissue regeneration in the rabbit knee joint. Biofabrication. 2016;8(1):014102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/014102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 59.Fahimipour F, Rasoulianboroujeni M, Dashtimoghadam E, Khoshroo K, Tahriri M, Bastami F, et al. 3D printed TCP-based scaffold incorporating VEGF-loaded PLGA microspheres for craniofacial tissue engineering. Dent Mater. 2017;33(11):1205–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.06.016. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 63.Duarte Campos DF, Blaeser A, Buellesbach K, Sen KS, Xun W, Tillmann W, et al. Bioprinting organotypic hydrogels with improved mesenchymal stem cell remodeling and mineralization properties for bone tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5(11):1336–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201501033. CrossRefGoogle Scholar