Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An oxygen plasma treated poly(dimethylsiloxane) bioscaffold coated with polydopamine for stem cell therapy

  • Tissue Engineering Constructs and Cell Substrates
  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, 3D macroporous bioscaffolds were developed from poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) which is inert, biocompatible, non-biodegradable, retrievable and easily manufactured at low cost. PDMS bioscaffolds were synthesized using a solvent casting and particulate leaching (SCPL) technique and exhibited a macroporous interconnected architecture with 86 ± 3% porosity and 300 ± 100 µm pore size. As PDMS intrinsically has a hydrophobic surface, mainly due to the existence of methyl groups, its surface was modified by oxygen plasma treatment which, in turn, enabled us to apply a novel polydopamine coating onto the surface of the bioscaffold. The addition of a polydopamine coating to bioscaffolds was confirmed using composition analysis. Characterization of oxygen plasma treated-PDMS bioscaffolds coated with polydopamine (polydopamine coated-PDMS bioscaffolds) showed the presence of hydroxyl and secondary amines on their surface which resulted in a significant decrease in water contact angle when compared to uncoated-PDMS bioscaffolds (35 ± 3%, P < 0.05). Seeding adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs) into polydopamine coated-PDMS bioscaffolds resulted in cells demonstrating a 70 ± 6% increase in viability and 40 ± 5% increase in proliferation when compared to AD-MSCs seeded into uncoated-PDMS bioscaffolds (P < 0.05). In summary, this two-step method of oxygen plasma treatment followed by polydopamine coating improves the biocompatibility of PDMS bioscaffolds and only requires the use of simple reagents and mild reaction conditions. Hence, our novel polydopamine coated-PDMS bioscaffolds can represent an efficient and low-cost bioscaffold platform to support MSC therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nolan K, Millet Y, Ricordi C, Stabler CL. Tissue engineering and biomaterials in regenerative medicine. Cell Transplant. 2008;17:241–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Danilov V, Dölle C, Ott M, Wagner H, Meichsner J. Plasma treatment of polydimethylsiloxane thin films studied by infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy. 29thICPIG, July 12-17, Cancún, México, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/dafa/f2d21dde70ccda35056a4f0113ae4aaaadda.pdf?_ga=2.94902553.463489516.1524765127-1439881367.1524765127. 2009.

  3. Matsuda K, Suzuki S, Isshiki N, Ikada Y. Re-freeze dried bilayer artificial skin. Biomaterials. 1993;14:1030–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kiremitçi M, Şerbetçi AI, Çolak R, Pişkin E. Cell attachment to PU and PHEMA based biomaterials: relation to structural properties. Clin Mater. 1991;8:9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Khorasani MT, Mirzadeh H. BHK cells behaviour on laser treated polydimethylsiloxane surface. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2004;35:67–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu M, Chen Q. Characterization study of bonded and unbonded polydimethylsiloxane aimed for bio-micro-electromechanical systems-related applications. J Micro/Nanolithogr, MEMS, Moems. 2007;6:23008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khanafer K, Duprey A, Schlicht M, Berguer R. Effects of strain rate, mixing ratio, and stress-strain definition on the mechanical behavior of the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) material as related to its biological applications. Biomed Micro. 2009;11:503–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Colas A, Curtis J. Silicone biomaterials: history and chemistry & medical applications of silicones. Repr Biomater Sci. 2005;80–6:697–707.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pedraza E, Brady AC, Fraker CA, Stabler CL. Synthesis of macroporous poly(dimethylsiloxane) scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. J Biomater Sci Ed. 2013;24:1041–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hassler C, Boretius T, Stieglitz T. Polymers for neural implants. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys2011;49:18–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Si J,Cui Z,Xie P,Song L,Wang Q,Liu Q, et al. Characterization of 3D elastic porous polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) cell scaffolds fabricated by VARTM and particle leaching. J Appl Polym Sci. 2016;42909:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bodas D, Khan-Malek C. Hydrophilization and hydrophobic recovery of PDMS by oxygen plasma and chemical treatment-An SEM investigation. Sens Actuators, B Chem. 2007;123:368–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Halldorsson S, Lucumi E, Gómez-Sjöberg R, Fleming RMT. Advantages and challenges of microfluidic cell culture in polydimethylsiloxane devices. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;63:218–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee JN, Jiang X, Ryan D, Whitesides GM. Compatibility of mammalian cells on surfaces of poly(dimethylsiloxane). Langmuir. 2004;20:11684–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fuard D, Tzvetkova-Chevolleau T, Decossas S, Tracqui P, Schiavone P. Optimization of poly-di-methyl-siloxane (PDMS) substrates for studying cellular adhesion and motility. Microelectron Eng. 2008;85:1289–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chuah YJ, Kuddannaya S, Lee MHA, Zhang Y, Kang Y. The effects of poly(dimethylsiloxane) surface silanization on the mesenchymal stem cell fate. Biomater Sci. 2015;3:383–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chuah YJ, Koh YT, Lim K, Menon NV, Wu Y, Kang Y. Simple surface engineering of polydimethylsiloxane with polydopamine for stabilized mesenchymal stem cell adhesion and multipotency. Sci Rep. 2015;5:18162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ye Q, Zhou F, Liu W. Bioinspired catecholic chemistry for surface modification. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40:4244.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuddannaya S, Chuah Y. Surface chemical modification of poly (dimethylsiloxane) for the enhanced adhesion and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013;5:9777–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang S, Liang N, Hu Y, Zhou X, Abidi N. Polydopamine-assisted surface modification for bone biosubstitutes. Biomed Res. Int. 2016;2016:1–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee H, Dellatore SM, Miller WM, Messersmith PB. Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science. 2007;318:426–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tan SH, Nguyen NT, Chua YC, Kang TG. Oxygen plasma treatment for reducing hydrophobicity of a sealed polydimethylsiloxane microchannel. Biomicrofluidics. 2010;4:32204.

  23. Hillborg H, Ankner JF, Gedde UW, Smith GD, Yasuda HK, Wikström K. Crosslinked polydimethylsiloxane exposed to oxygen plasma studied by neutron reflectometry and other surface specific techniques. Polymer (Guildf). 2000;41:6851–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bhat S, Kumar A. Biomaterials in regenerative medicine. J Post Med Edu Res. 2012;46:81–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Caplan AI. Adult mesenchymal stem cells for tissue engineering versus regenerative medicine. J Cell Physiol. 2007;213:341–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Serup P, Madsen OD, Mandrup-Poulsen T. Islet and stem cell transplantation for treating diabetes. BMJ. 2001;322:29–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Krishnan R, Alexander M, Robles L, Foster CE, Lakey JRT. Islet and stem cell encapsulation for clinical transplantation. Rev Diabet Stud. 2014;11:84–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ito T, Itakura S, Todorov I, Rawson J, Asari S, Shintaku J, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell and islet co-transplantation promotes graft revascularization and function. Transplantation. 2010;89:1438–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang F, Zhao B. Adhesion properties of self-polymerized dopamine thin film. Open Surf Sci J. 2011;3:115–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsai WB, Chen WT, Chien HW, Kuo WH, Wang MJ. Poly(dopamine) coating of scaffolds for articular cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:4187–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ko E, Yang K, Shin J, Cho SW. Polydopamine-assisted osteoinductive peptide immobilization of polymer scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration by human adipose-derived stem cells. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14:3202–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tsai WB, Chen WT, Chien HW, Kuo WH, Wang MJ. Poly(dopamine) coating to biodegradable polymers for bone tissue engineering. J Biomater Appl. 2014;28:837–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pariente J-L, Kim B-S, Atala A. In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of naturally derived and synthetic biomaterials using normal human bladder smooth muscle cells. J Urol. 2002;167:1867–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Song E, Yeon Kim S, Chun T, Byun HJ, Lee YM. Collagen scaffolds derived from a marine source and their biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2006;27:2951–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Duffy DC, McDonald JC, Schueller OJA, Whitesides GM. Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal Chem. 1998;70:4974–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. McDonald JC, Whitesides GM. Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a material for fabricating microfluidic devices. Acc Chem Res. 2002;35:491–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mata A, Fleischman AJ, Roy S. Characterization of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) properties for biomedical micro/nanosystems. Biomed Micro. 2005;7:281–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kumari J, Karande AA, Kumar A. Combined effect of cryogel matrix and temperature-reversible soluble-insoluble polymer for the development of in vitro human liver tissue. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:264–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Matsiko A, Gleeson JP, O’Brien FJ. Scaffold mean pore size influences mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenic differentiation and matrix deposition. Tissue Eng Part A. 2015;21:486–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bencherif SA, Warren Sands R, Ali OA, Li WA, Lewin SA, Braschler TM, et al. Injectable cryogel-based whole-cell cancer vaccines. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7556.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Mandal BB, Kundu SC. Cell proliferation and migration in silk fibroin 3D scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2009;30:2956–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kumari J,Kumar A, Development of polymer based cryogel matrix for transportation and storage of mammalian cells. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2017;7:41551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yoo HS, Kim TG, Park TG. Surface-functionalized electrospun nanofibers for tissue engineering and drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009;61:1033–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Martins A, Pinho ED, Faria S, Pashkuleva I, Marques AP, Reis RL, et al. Surface modification of electrospun polycaprolactone nanofiber meshes by plasma treatment to enhance biological performance. Small. 2009;5:1195–206.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ma Z, Gao C, Gong Y, Shen J. Cartilage tissue engineering PLLA scaffold with surface immobilized collagen and basic fibroblast growth factor. Biomaterials. 2005;26:1253–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Yu H, Chong ZZ, Tor SB, Liu E, Loh NH. Low temperature and deformation-free bonding of PMMA microfluidic devices with stable hydrophilicity via oxygen plasma treatment and PVA coating. RSC Adv. 2015;5:8377–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Hui AYN, Wang G, Lin B, Chan W-T. Microwave plasma treatment of polymer surface for irreversible sealing of microfluidic devices. Lab Chip. 2005;5:1173–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Tsougeni K, Vourdas N, Tserepi A, Gogolides E, Cardinaud C. Mechanisms of oxygen plasma nanotexturing of organic polymer surfaces: from stable super hydrophilic to super hydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir. 2009;25:11748–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Bhattacharya S, Datta A, Berg JM, Gangopadhyay S. Studies on surface wettability of poly(dimethyl) siloxane (PDMS) and glass under oxygen-plasma treatment and correlation with bond strength. J Micro Syst. 2005;14:590–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Morra M, Occhiello E, Marola R, Garbassi F, Humphrey P, Johnson D. On the aging of oxygen plasma-treated polydimethylsiloxane surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1990;137:11–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Tóth A, Bertóti I, Blazsó M, Bánhegyi G, Bognar A, Szaplonczay P. Oxidative damage and recovery of silicone rubber surfaces. I. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopic study. J Appl Polym Sci. 1994;52:1293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Eddington DT, Puccinelli JP, Beebe DJ. Thermal aging and reduced hydrophobic recovery of polydimethylsiloxane. Sens Actuators, B Chem. 2006;114:170–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Kim J, Chaudhury MK, Owen MJ, Orbeck T. The mechanisms of hydrophobic recovery of polydimethylsiloxane elastomers exposed to partial electrical discharges. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2001;244:200–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Chen IJ, Lindner E. The stability of radio-frequency plasma-treated polydimethylsiloxane surfaces. Langmuir. 2007;23:3118–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Hashimoto M, Shevkoplyas SS, Zasońska B, Szymborski T, Garstecki P, Whitesides GM. Formation of bubbles and droplets in parallel, coupled flow-focusing geometries. Small. 2008;4:1795–805.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Roth J, Albrecht V, Nitschke M, Bellmann C, Simons F, Zschoche S, et al. Surface functionalization of silicone rubber for permanent adhesion improvement. Langmuir. 2008;24:12603–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Matějíček J, Vilémová M, Mušálek R, Sachr P, Horník J. The influence of interface characteristics on the adhesion/cohesion of plasma sprayed tungsten coatings. Coatings. 2013;3:108–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Fu J,Chuah YJ,Ang WT,Zheng N,Wang D-A, Optimization of a polydopamine (PD)-based coating method and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates for improved mouse embryonic stem cell (ESC) pluripotency maintenance and cardiac differentiation. Biomater Sci. 2017;5:1156–73. http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C7BM00266A.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Rim NG, Kim SJ, Shin YM, Jun I, Lim DW, Park JH, et al. Mussel-inspired surface modification of poly(l-lactide) electrospun fibers for modulation of osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Colloids Surf B-Biointerfaces. 2012;91:189–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Gomathi N,Mishra I,Varma S,Neogi S., Surface modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) through oxygen and nitrogen plasma treatment to improve its characteristics towards biomedical applications. Surf Topogr Metrol Prop. 2015;035005:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ding YH, Floren M, Tan W. Mussel-inspired polydopamine for bio-surface functionalization. Biosurf Biotribol. 2016;2:121–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Lee H, Dellatore SM, Miller WM, Messersmith PB. Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science. 2007;318:426–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Hong S, Kim KY, Wook HJ, Park SY, Lee KD, Lee DY, et al. Attenuation of the in vivo toxicity of biomaterials by polydopamine surface modification. Nanomedicine. 2011;6:793–801.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Jiang X, Christopherson GT, Mao H-Q. The effect of nanofibre surface amine density and conjugate structure on the adhesion and proliferation of human haematopoietic progenitor cells. Interface Focus. 2011;1:725–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Lee JH, Jung HW, Kang I-K, Lee HB. Cell behaviour on polymer surfaces with different functional groups. Biomaterials. 1994;15:705–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Shin YM, Lee YB, Kim SJ, Kang JK, Park JC, Jang W, et al. Mussel-inspired immobilization of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for enhanced endothelialization of vascular grafts. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13:2020–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Stanford Nano Shared Facilities (SNSF) grant (1161726-146-DAARZ), as part of the grant supported by the National Science Foundation grant (ECCS-1542152) and the Stanford Neuroscience Microscopy Service grant (NIH NS069375).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA

    Mehdi Razavi & Avnesh S. Thakor

Authors
  1. Mehdi Razavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Avnesh S. Thakor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avnesh S. Thakor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Razavi, M., Thakor, A.S. An oxygen plasma treated poly(dimethylsiloxane) bioscaffold coated with polydopamine for stem cell therapy. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 29, 54 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6077-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6077-x

Search

Navigation