Shape memory response of porous NiTi shape memory alloys fabricated by selective laser melting

  • Soheil Saedi
  • Sayed E. Saghaian
  • Ahmadreza Jahadakbar
  • Narges Shayesteh Moghaddam
  • Mohsen Taheri Andani
  • Sayed M. Saghaian
  • Y. Charles Lu
  • Mohammad Elahinia
  • Haluk E. Karaca
Biomaterials Synthesis and Characterization Original Research
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Biomaterials Synthesis and Characterization


Porous NiTi scaffolds display unique bone-like properties including low stiffness and superelastic behavior which makes them promising for biomedical applications. The present article focuses on the techniques to enhance superelasticity of porous NiTi structures. Selective Laser Melting (SLM) method was employed to fabricate the dense and porous (32–58%) NiTi parts. The fabricated samples were subsequently heat-treated (solution annealing + aging at 350 °C for 15 min) and their thermo-mechanical properties were determined as functions of temperature and stress. Additionally, the mechanical behaviors of the samples were simulated and compared to the experimental results. It is shown that SLM NiTi with up to 58% porosity can display shape memory effect with full recovery under 100 MPa nominal stress. Dense SLM NiTi could show almost perfect superelasticity with strain recovery of 5.65 after 6% deformation at body temperatures. The strain recoveries were 3.5, 3.6, and 2.7% for samples with porosity levels of 32%, 45%, and 58%, respectively. Furthermore, it was shown that Young’s modulus (i.e., stiffness) of NiTi parts can be tuned by adjusting the porosity levels to match the properties of the bones.



The authors wish to acknowledge partial support for this research from Third Frontier (State of Ohio) grant 15–791, titled “Additive Manufacture of Stiffness-Matched Skeletal Fixation Hardware”.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    de Wild M, et al. Damping of selective-laser-melted NiTi for medical implants. J Mater Eng Perform. 2014;23:2614–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elahinia M, et al. Fabrication of NiTi through additive manufacturing: A review. Prog Mater Sci. 2016;83:630–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kuphasuk C, et al. Electrochemical corrosion of titanium and titanium-based alloys. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bagheri A, Mahtabi MJ, Shamsaei N. Fatigue behavior and cyclic deformation of additive manufactured NiTi. J Mater Process Technol. 2018;252:440–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moghaddam NS, et al. Metals for bone implants: safety, design, and efficacy. Biomanufacturing Rev. 2016;1:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ryhänen J, et al. Biocompatibility of nickel-titanium shape memory metal and its corrosion behavior in human cell cultures. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;35:451–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simske S, Sachdeva R. Cranial bone apposition and ingrowth in a porous nickel–titanium implant. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:527–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kang S-B, et al. In vivo result of porous TiNi shape memory alloy: bone response and growth. Mater Trans. 2002;43:1045–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bansiddhi A, et al. Porous NiTi for bone implants: a review. Acta Biomater. 2008;4:773–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andani MT, et al. Metals for bone implants. Part 1. Powder metallurgy and implant rendering. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:4058–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moghaddam NS, et al. Metallic fixation of mandibular segmental defects: graft immobilization and orofacial functional maintenance. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4:e858. Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moghaddam NS, et al. Three dimensional printing of stiffness-tuned, nitinol skeletal fixation hardware with an example of mandibular segmental defect repair. Procedia CIRP. 2016;49:45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moghaddam NS et al. Enhancement of bone implants by substituting nitinol for titanium (Ti-6Al-4V): A modeling comparison. In ASME 2014 Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems. 2014. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Newport, Rhode Island, USA.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Greiner C, Oppenheimer SM, Dunand DC. High strength, low stiffness, porous NiTi with superelastic properties. Acta Biomater. 2005;1:705–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Simske S, Ayers R, Bateman T. Porous materials for bone engineering. Mater Sci Forum. 1997;250:151–182.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gibson LJ and Ashby MF. Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Elahinia MH, et al. Manufacturing and processing of NiTi implants: a review. Prog Mater Sci. 2012;57:911–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nouri A, Hodgson PD, Wen CE. Biomimetic porous titanium scaffolds for orthopaedic and dental applications. Biomimetics Learning from Nature InTech: London, UK, 2010. ISBN 978-953-307-025-4.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krishna BV, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A. Fabrication and characterization of porous Ti6Al4V parts for biomedical applications using electron beam melting process. J Acta Biomater. 2007;3:997–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shishkovsky I, et al. Porous biocompatible implants and tissue scaffolds synthesized by selective laser sintering from Ti and NiTi. J Mater Chem. 2008;18:1309–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Imwinkelried T. Mechanical properties of open-pore titanium foam. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;81:964–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Köhl M, Bram M, Buchkremer HP, Stöver D, Habijan T, Köller M. Powder metallurgical production, mechanical and biomedical properties of porous NiTi shape memory alloys. In Materials and Processes for Medical Devices Conference. Palm Desert, CA. 2007.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aydogmus T, Bor A. Production and characterization of porous TiNi shape memory alloys. Turk J Eng Environ Sci. 2011;35:69–82.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stoeckel D. The shape memory effect-phenomenon, alloys and applications. Proceedings: Shape Memory Alloys for Power Systems EPRI, Fremont, CA, 1995. pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Buehler WJ, Wang FE. A summary of recent research on the Nitinol alloys and their potential application in ocean engineering. Ocean Eng. 1968;1:105–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Funakubo H, Kennedy JB. Shape memory alloys. Gordon and Breach, xii + 275, 15 x 22 cm, Illustrated, 1987: p. 78. NewYork, USA.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tang W. Thermodynamic study of the low-temperature phase B19′ and the martensitic transformation in near-equiatomic Ti-Ni shape memory alloys. Metall Mater Trans A. 1997;28:537–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Turabi AS, Saedi S, Saghaian SM, Karaca HE, Elahinia M. Experimental characterization of shape memory alloys. Shape memory alloy actuators: Design, fabrication, and experimental evaluation. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 2015.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nishida M, Wayman C, Honma T. Precipitation processes in near-equiatomic TiNi shape memory alloys. Metall Trans A. 1986;17:1505–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Andani MT, et al. Achieving biocompatible stiffness in NiTi through additive manufacturing. J Intell Mater Syst Struct. 2016;27:2661–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wu MH. Fabrication of nitinol materials and components. in: Materials Science Forum. Trans Tech Publ. 2002;394:285–292.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rengier F, et al. 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2010;5:335–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mullen L, et al. Selective laser melting: a regular unit cell approach for the manufacture of porous, titanium, bone in-growth constructs, suitable for orthopedic applications. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2009;89B:325–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dadbakhsh S, et al. Influence of SLM on shape memory and compression behaviour of NiTi scaffolds. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol. 2015;64:209–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Speirs M et al. The effect of SLM parameters on geometrical characteristics of open porous NiTi scaffolds. In High value manufacturing: advanced research in virtual and rapid prototyping: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping, Leiria, Portugal, 1–5 October, 2013. 2013. CRC Press.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Taheri Andani M, et al. Mechanical and shape memory properties of porous Ni50.1Ti49.9 alloys manufactured by selective laser melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;68:224–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Speirs M, et al. Fatigue behaviour of NiTi shape memory alloy scaffolds produced by SLM, a unit cell design comparison. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;70:53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Saedi S, et al. On the effects of selective laser melting process parameters on microstructure and thermomechanical response of Ni-rich NiTi. Acta Mater. 2018;144:552–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Saedi S, et al. Thermomechanical characterization of Ni-rich NiTi fabricated by selective laser melting. Smart Mater Struct. 2016;25:035005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Saedi S, et al. The influence of heat treatment on the thermomechanical response of Ni-rich NiTi alloys manufactured by selective laser melting. J Alloy Compd. 2016;677:204–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Saedi S, et al. Texture, aging, and superelasticity of selective laser melting fabricated Ni-rich NiTi alloys. Mater Sci Eng: A. 2017;686:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Walker JM, et al. Process development and characterization of additively manufactured nickel–titanium shape memory parts. J Intell Mater Syst Struct. 2016;27:2653–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rahmanian R et al. Load bearing and stiffness tailored niti implants produced by additive manufacturing: a simulation study. In SPIE Smart Structures and Materials+Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring. 2014. International Society for Optics and Photonics. San Diego, California, United States.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Auricchio F, Taylor RL. Shape-memory alloys: modelling and numerical simulations of the finite-strain superelastic behavior. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 1997;143:175–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Karaca HE, et al. Shape memory behavior of high strength Ni54Ti46 alloys. Mater Sci Eng: A. 2013;580:66–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zhao Y, et al. Compression behavior of porous NiTi shape memory alloy. Acta Mater. 2005;53:337–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nemat-Nasser S, et al. Experimental characterization and micromechanical modeling of superelastic response of a porous NiTi shape-memory alloy. J Mech Phys Solids. 2005;53:2320–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zhang X, et al. Superelasticity decay of porous NiTi shape memory alloys under cyclic strain-controlled fatigue conditions. Mater Sci Eng: A. 2008;481:170–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bram M, et al. Mechanical properties of highly porous NiTi alloys. J Mater Eng Perform. 2011;20:522–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hosseini S, et al. A comparative study on the mechanical behavior of porous titanium and NiTi produced by a space holder technique. J Mater Eng Perform. 2014;23:799–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hench LL. Bioceramics, a clinical success. Am Ceram Soc Bull. 1998;77:67–74.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soheil Saedi
    • 1
  • Sayed E. Saghaian
    • 1
  • Ahmadreza Jahadakbar
    • 2
  • Narges Shayesteh Moghaddam
    • 2
  • Mohsen Taheri Andani
    • 2
    • 3
  • Sayed M. Saghaian
    • 1
  • Y. Charles Lu
    • 1
  • Mohammad Elahinia
    • 2
  • Haluk E. Karaca
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.Dynamic and Smart Systems Laboratory, Mechanical Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering DepartmentThe University of ToledoToledoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical Engineering, S.M. Wu Manufacturing Research Center, College of EngineeringUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations