Skip to main content

A nanofibrous electrospun patch to maintain human mesenchymal cell stemness


Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been extensively investigated in regenerative medicine because of their crucial role in tissue healing. For these properties, they are widely tested in clinical trials, usually injected in cell suspension or in combination with tridimensional scaffolds. However, scaffolds can largely affect the fates of MSCs, inducing a progressive loss of functionality overtime. The ideal scaffold must delay MSCs differentiation until paracrine signals from the host induce their change. Herein, we proposed a nanostructured electrospun gelatin patch as an appropriate environment where human MSCs (hMSCs) can adhere, proliferate, and maintain their stemness. This patch exhibited characteristics of a non-linear elastic material and withstood degradation up to 4 weeks. As compared to culture and expansion in 2D, hMSCs on the patch showed a similar degree of proliferation and better maintained their progenitor properties, as assessed by their superior differentiation capacity towards typical mesenchymal lineages (i.e. osteogenic and chondrogenic). Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis and longitudinal non-invasive imaging of inflammatory response revealed no sign of foreign body reaction for 3 weeks. In summary, our results demonstrated that our biocompatible patch favored the maintenance of undifferentiated hMSCs for up to 21 days and is an ideal candidate for tridimensional delivery of hMSCs.

Graphical Abstract

The present work reports a nanostructured patch gelatin-based able to maintain in vitro hMSCs stemness features. Moreover, hMSCs were able to differentiate toward osteo- and chondrogenic lineages once induces by differentiative media, confirming the ability of this patch to support stem cells for a potential in vivo application. These attractive properties together with the low inflammatory response in vivo make this patch a promising platform in regenerative medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7


  1. 1.

    Bianco P, Riminucci M, Gronthos S, Robey PG. Bone marrow stromal stem cells: nature, biology, and potential applications. Stem Cells. 2001;19(3):180–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Barry FP, Murphy JM. Mesenchymal stem cells: clinical applications and biological characterization. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36(4):568–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Corradetti B, Taraballi F, Powell S, Sung D, Minardi S, Ferrari M, et al. Osteoprogenitor cells from bone marrow and cortical bone: understanding how the environment affects their fate. Stem Cells Dev. 2014;24(9):1112–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kalervo Väänänen H. Mesenchymal stem cells. Ann Med. 2005;37(7):469–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rustad KC, Wong VW, Sorkin M, Glotzbach JP, Major MR, Rajadas J, et al. Enhancement of mesenchymal stem cell angiogenic capacity and stemness by a biomimetic hydrogel scaffold. Biomaterials. 2012;33(1):80–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Quarto R, Mastrogiacomo M, Cancedda R, Kutepov SM, Mukhachev V, Lavroukov A, et al. Repair of large bone defects with the use of autologous bone marrow stromal cells. New Engl J Med. 2001;344(5):385–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lee CH, Cook JL, Mendelson A, Moioli EK, Yao H, Mao JJ. Regeneration of the articular surface of the rabbit synovial joint by cell homing: a proof of concept study. Lancet. 2010;376(9739):440–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    O’brien FJ. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today. 2011;14(3):88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Geckil H, Xu F, Zhang X, Moon S, Demirci U. Engineering hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics. Nanomedicine. 2010;5(3):469–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Augello A, Kurth TB, De Bari C. Mesenchymal stem cells: a perspective from in vitro cultures to in vivo migration and niches. Eur Cell Mater. 2010;20:121–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Peerani R, Rao BM, Bauwens C, Yin T, Wood GA, Nagy A, et al. Niche‐mediated control of human embryonic stem cell self‐renewal and differentiation. EMBO J. 2007;26(22):4744–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Tsai C-C, Chen C-L, Liu H-C, Lee Y-T, Wang H-W, Hou L-T, et al. Overexpression of hTERT increases stem-like properties and decreases spontaneous differentiation in human mesenchymal stem cell lines. J Biomed Sci. 2010;17(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hocking AM, Gibran NS. Mesenchymal stem cells: paracrine signaling and differentiation during cutaneous wound repair. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316(14):2213–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Trcin MT, Dekaris I, Mijović B, Bujić M, Zdraveva E, Dolenec T, et al. Synthetic vs natural scaffolds for human limbal stem cells. Croat Med J. 2015;56(3):246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Casper CL, Yang W, Farach-Carson MC, Rabolt JF. Coating electrospun collagen and gelatin fibers with perlecan domain I for increased growth factor binding. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8(4):1116–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Matthews JA, Wnek GE, Simpson DG, Bowlin GL. Electrospinning of collagen nanofibers. Biomacromolecules. 2002;3(2):232–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zhang Z, Li G, Shi B. Physicochemical properties of collagen, gelatin and collagen hydrolysate derived from bovine limed split wastes. J Soc Leath Tech Ch. 2006;90(1):23

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zhang Y, Venugopal J, Huang ZM, Lim C, Ramakrishna S. Crosslinking of the electrospun gelatin nanofibers. Polymer (Guildf). 2006;47(8):2911–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mano J, Silva G, Azevedo HS, Malafaya P, Sousa R, Silva S, et al. Natural origin biodegradable systems in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: present status and some moving trends. J R Soc Interface. 2007;4(17):999–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Schiffman JD, Schauer CL. A review: electrospinning of biopolymer nanofibers and their applications. Polym Rev. 2008;48(2):317–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kriegel C, Arrechi A, Kit K, McClements DJ, Weiss J. Fabrication, functionalization, and application of electrospun biopolymer nanofibers. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2008;48(8):775–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Huang ZM, Zhang YZ, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S. A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol. 2003;63(15):2223–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Pham QP, Sharma U, Mikos AG. Electrospun poly (ε-caprolactone) microfiber and multilayer nanofiber/microfiber scaffolds: characterization of scaffolds and measurement of cellular infiltration. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7(10):2796–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yoshimoto H, Shin Y, Terai H, Vacanti J. A biodegradable nanofiber scaffold by electrospinning and its potential for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2003;24(12):2077–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L, Morshed M, Karbalaie K, Fesharaki M, Nasr-Esfahani MH, Baharvand H. Electrospun poly (ε-caprolactone) nanofiber mat as extracellular matrix. Yakhteh Med J. 2008;10(3):179–84.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Melchels FPW, et al. Effects of the architecture of tissue engineering scaffolds on cell seeding and culturing. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(11):4208–17.

  27. 27.

    Garg K, Bowlin GL. Electrospinning jets and nanofibrous structures. Biomicrofluidics. 2011;5(1):013403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Minardi S, Sandri M, Martinez JO, Yazdi IK, Liu X, Ferrari M, et al. Multiscale patterning of a biomimetic scaffold integrated with composite microspheres. Small. 2014;10(19):3943–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Corradetti B, Taraballi F, Powell S, Sung D, Minardi S, Ferrari M, et al. Osteoprogenitor cells from bone marrow and cortical bone: understanding how the environment affects their fate. Stem Cells Dev. 2015;24(9):1112–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Taraballi F, Wang S, Li J, Lee FYY, Venkatraman SS, Birch WR, et al. Understanding the nano‐topography changes and cellular influences resulting from the surface adsorption of human hair keratins. Adv Healthc Mater. 2012;1(4):513–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Minardi S, Pandolfi L, Taraballi F, De Rosa E, Yazdi IK, Liu X, et al. PLGA-mesoporous silicon microspheres for the in vivo controlled temporospatial delivery of proteins. ACS Appl Mater Inter. 2015;7(30):16364–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Torres-Giner S, Gimeno-Alcaniz JV, Ocio MJ, Lagaron JM. Comparative performance of electrospun collagen nanofibers cross-linked by means of different methods. ACS Appl Mater Inter. 2008;1(1):218–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Meng L, Arnoult O, Smith M, Wnek GE. Electrospinning of in situ crosslinked collagen nanofibers. J Mater Chem. 2012;22(37):19412–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Gross S, Gammon ST, Moss BL, Rauch D, Harding J, Heinecke JW, et al. Bioluminescence imaging of myeloperoxidase activity in vivo. Nat Med. 2009;15(4):455–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Li L, Xie T. Stem cell niche: structure and function. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:605–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Spradling A, Drummond-Barbosa D, Kai T. Stem cells find their niche. Nature. 2001;414(6859):98–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Yao W, Lane NE. Targeted delivery of mesenchymal stem cells to the bone. Bone. 2015;70:62–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Simpson D, Liu H, Fan THM, Nerem R, Dudley SC. A tissue engineering approach to progenitor cell delivery results in significant cell engraftment and improved myocardial remodeling. Stem Cells. 2007;25(9):2350–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kouris NA, Squirrell JM, Jung JP, Pehlke CA, Hacker T, Eliceiri KW, et al. A nondenatured, noncrosslinked collagen matrix to deliver stem cells to the heart. Regen Med. 2011;6(5):569–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Li M, Yu J, Li Y, Li D, Yan D, Ruan Q. CXCR4+ progenitors derived from bone mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into endothelial cells capable of vascular repair after arterial injury. Cell Reprogram. 2010;12(4):405–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Silva GV, Litovsky S, Assad JA, Sousa AL, Martin BJ, Vela D, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into an endothelial phenotype, enhance vascular density, and improve heart function in a canine chronic ischemia model. Circulation. 2005;111(2):150–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Galperin A, Long TJ, Ratner BD. Degradable, thermo-sensitive poly (N-isopropyl acrylamide)-based scaffolds with controlled porosity for tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules. 2010;11(10):2583–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science. 2005;310(5751):1139–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Wang H-B, Dembo M, Wang YL. Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. Am J Physiol-Cell Ph. 2000;279(5):C1345–C50.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Nam J, Huang Y, Agarwal S, Lannutti J. Improved cellular infiltration in electrospun fiber via engineered porosity. Tiss Eng. 2007;13(9):2249–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Manning C, Schwartz A, Liu W, Xie J, Havlioglu N, Sakiyama-Elbert S, et al. Controlled delivery of mesenchymal stem cells and growth factors using a nanofiber scaffold for tendon repair. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(6):6905–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Kuhn NZ, Tuan RS. Regulation of stemness and stem cell niche of mesenchymal stem cells: implications in tumorigenesis and metastasis. J Cell Physiol. 2010;222(2):268–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Edmondson R, Broglie JJ, Adcock AF, Yang L. Three-dimensional cell culture systems and their applications in drug discovery and cell-based biosensors. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2014;12(4):207–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Westhrin M, Xie M, Olderøy MØ, Sikorski P, Strand BL, Standal T. Osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in mineralized alginate matrices. PloS One. 2015;10(3):2583–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Page H, Flood P, Reynaud EG. Three-dimensional tissue cultures: current trends and beyond. Cell Tissue Res. 2013;352(1):123–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Celiz AD, Smith JG, Langer R, Anderson DG, Winkler DA, Barrett DA, et al. Materials for stem cell factories of the future. Nat Mater. 2014;13(6):570–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kastellorizios M, Tipnis N, Burgess DJ. Foreign body reaction to subcutaneous implants. In: John DL, Kristina NE, Daniel R, Bo N, editors. Immune responses to biosurfaces. Springer;2015. pp. 93–108.

Download references


The authors acknowledge Ms. Nupur Basu for harvesting the cells used in this study and Dr. Junping You and Dr. Armando Torres for helping with the in vivo studies. We also acknowledge Mr. Christopher Candelari and Chih Hao Liu for helping with the mechanical testing. We thank Dr. J. Gu of the HMRI Microscopy-SEM/AFM core, and Dr. David Haviland, Director of the flow cytometry core. We also thank Ms. Megan Livingston for editing this document. The authors gratefully acknowledge funding support from the following sources: Brown Foundation (Project ID, 18130011), the Hearst Foundation (Project ID, 18130017), the Cullen Trust for Health Care Foundation (Project ID, 18130014), and the DoD USAMRMC (Project ID, W81XWH-15-1-0718).

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to F. Taraballi or E. Tasciotti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pandolfi, L., Furman, N.T., Wang, X. et al. A nanofibrous electrospun patch to maintain human mesenchymal cell stemness. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 28, 44 (2017).

Download citation


  • ThermoFisher Scientific
  • HFIP
  • Multilineage Differentiation
  • Osteogenic Marker
  • Chondrogenic Lineage