Fabrication mechanism of nanostructured HA/TNTs biomedical coatings: an improvement in nanomechanical and in vitro biological responses
- 211 Downloads
In this paper, a mechanism for fabrication of nanostructured hydroxyapatite coating on TiO2 nanotubes is presented. Also, the physical, biological, and nanomechanical properties of the anodized Ti6Al4V alloy consisting TiO2 nanotubes, electrodeposited hydroxyapatite, and the hydroxyapatite/TiO2 nanotubes double layer coating on Ti6Al4V alloy implants are compared. Mean cell viability of the samples being 84.63 % for uncoated plate, 91.53 % for electrodeposited hydroxyapatite, and 94.98 % for hydroxyapatite/TiO2 nanotubes coated sample were in the acceptable range. Merely anodized prototype had the highest biocompatibility of 110 % with respect to the control sample. Bonding strength of hydroxyapatite deposit to the substrate increased from 12 ± 2 MPa to 25.4 ± 2 MPa using intermediate TiO2 nanotubes layer. Hardness and elastic modulus of the anodized surface were 956 MPa and 64.7 GPa, respectively. The corresponding values for hydroxyapatite deposit were approximately measured 44.3 MPa and 0.66 GPa, respectively, while the average obtained values for hardness (159.3 MPa) and elastic modulus (2.25 GPa) of the hydroxyapatite/TiO2 nanotubes double coating improved more than 30 % of the pure hydroxyapatite deposit. Friction coefficient (ξ) of the anodized surface was 0.32 ± 0.02. The calculated friction coefficient enhanced from 0.65 ± 0.04 for sole hydroxyapatite layer to the 0.46 ± 0.02 for hydroxyapatite/TiO2 nanotubes due to presence of nanotubular TiO2 intermediate layer.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Naddaf Dezfuli S, Sadrnezhaad SK, Shokrgozar MA, Bonakdar S. Fabrication of biocompatible titanium scaffolds using space holder technique. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2012;23(10):2483–8.Google Scholar
- 4.Ratner BD. A perspective on titanium biocompatibility. In: Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Textor M, Thomsen P, editors. Titanium in medicine: materials science, surface science, engineering, biological responses and medical applications. Springer; 2001. pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
- 5.Thomsen MP, Eriksson AS, Olsson R, Bjursten LM, Branemark PI, Ericson LE. Morphological studies on titanium implant inserted in rabbit knee-joints. Adv Biomater. 1987;7:87–92.Google Scholar
- 6.Bajgai MP, Parajuli DC, Park SJ, Chu KH, Kang HS, Kim HY. In vitro bioactivity of sol-gel-derived hydroxyapatite particulate nan0ofiber modified titanium, J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2010;21(2):685–94.Google Scholar
- 7.Hong MH, Lee DH, Kim KM, Lee YK. Improved bonding strength between TiO2 film and Ti substrate by microarc oxidation, Surf Interface Anal. 2010;42(6–7):492–6.Google Scholar
- 13.Mucalo, M. Hydroxyapatite (HAp) for Biomedical Applications, Technology & Engineering; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2015.Google Scholar
- 28.Gongadze E, Kabaso D, Bauer S, Slivnik T, Schmuki P, Van Rienen U, Iglič A. Adhesion of osteoblasts to a nanorough titanium implant surface. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:1801Google Scholar
- 34.Zelko J, Iglič A, Kralj-Iglič V, Kumar PS. Effects of counterion size on the attraction between similarly charged surfaces. J Chem Phys. 2010;133(20):204901.Google Scholar