Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of friction between articular cartilage and polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel artificial cartilage

  • Engineering and Nano-engineering Approaches for Medical Devices
  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many biomaterials are being used to repair damaged articular cartilage. In particular, poly vinyl alcohol hydrogel has similar mechanical properties to natural cartilage under compressive and shearing loading. Here, three-factor and two-level friction experiments and long-term tests were conducted to better evaluate its tribological properties. The friction coefficient between articular cartilage and the poly vinyl alcohol hydrogel depended primarily on the three factors of load, speed, and lubrication. When the speed increased from 10 to 20 mm/s under a load of 10 N, the friction coefficient increased from 0.12 to 0.147. When the lubricant was changed from Ringer’s solution to a hyaluronic acid solution, the friction coefficient decreased to 0.084 with loads as high as 22 N. The poly vinyl alcohol hydrogel was severely damaged and lost its top surface layers, which were transferred to the articular cartilage surface. Wear was observed in the surface morphologies, which indicated the occurrence of surface adhesion of bovine cartilage. Surface fatigue and adhesive wear was the dominant wear mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koszowska A, Hawranek R, Nowak J. Osteoarthritis—a multifactorial issue. Reumatologia. 2014;52:319–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Potter HG, Jain SK, Ma Y, Black BR, Fung S, Lyman S. Cartilage injury after acute, isolated anterior cruciate ligament tear immediate and longitudinal effect with clinical/MRI follow-up. Am J Sport Med. 2012;40:276–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Unsworth A. Recent developments in the tribology of artificial joints. Tribol. Int. 1995;28:485–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brockett CL, Harper P, Williams S, Isaac GH, Dwyer-Joyce RS, Jin ZM, et al. The influence of clearance on friction, lubrication and squeaking in large diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements. J Mater Sci-Mater M. 2008;19:1575–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wimmer MA, Andriacchi TP. Tractive forces during rolling motion of the knee: implications for wear in total knee replacement. J. Biomech. 1997;30:131–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Benevenia J, Lee FYI, Buechel F, Parsons JR. Pathologic supracondylar fracture due to osteolytic pseudotumor of knee following cementless total knee replacement. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1998;43:473–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Corkhill P, Trevett A, Tighe B. The potential of hydrogels as synthetic articular cartilage. P I Mech Eng H. 1990;204:147–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffman AS. Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliver Rev. 2012;64:18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li JK, Wang N, Wu XS. Poly(vinyl alcohol) nanoparticles prepared by freezing–thawing process for protein/peptide drug delivery. J Control Release. 1998;56:117–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. DiTizio V, Ferguson GW, Mittelman MW, Khoury AE, Bruce AW, DiCosmo F. A liposomal hydrogel for the prevention of bacterial adhesion to catheters. Biomaterials. 1998;19:1877–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Oka M, Noguchi T, Kumar P, Ikeuchi K, Yamamuro T, Hyon SH, et al. Development of an artificial articular cartilage. Clin Mater. 1990;6:361–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Anseth KS, Bowman CN, Brannon-Peppas L. Mechanical properties of hydrogels and their experimental determination. Biomaterials. 1996;17:1647–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sardinha VM, Lima LL, Belangero WD, Zavaglia CA, Bavaresco VP, Gomes JR. Tribological characterization of polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel as substitute of articular cartilage. Wear. 2013;301:218–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li F, Su Y, Wang J, Wu G, Wang C. Influence of dynamic load on friction behavior of human articular cartilage, stainless steel and polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel as artificial cartilage. J Mater Sci-Mater M. 2010;21:147–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bavaresco VP, Zavaglia CAC, Reis MC, Gomes JR. Study on the tribological properties of pHEMA hydrogels for use in artificial articular cartilage. Wear. 2008;265:269–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma R, Xiong D, Miao F, Zhang J, Peng Y. Novel PVP/PVA hydrogels for articular cartilage replacement. Mater. Sci. Eng., C. 2009;29:1979–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu G, Zhang W, Wang C. Tribological properties of polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel reinforced with nanometer hydroxy apatite. J Wuhan Univ Technol-Mater. Sci. Ed. 2008;23:46–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pan Y, Xiong D, Ma R. A study on the friction properties of poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel as articular cartilage against titanium alloy. Wear. 2007;262:1021–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Forster H, Fisher J. The influence of continuous sliding and subsequent surface wear on the friction of articular cartilage. P I Mech Eng H. 1999;213:329–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Northwood E, Fisher J. A multi-directional in vitro investigation into friction, damage and wear of innovative chondroplasty materials against articular cartilage. Clin. Biomech. 2007;22:834–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pickard JE, Fisher J, Ingham E, Egan J. Investigation into the effects of proteins and lipids on the frictional properties of articular cartilage. Biomaterials. 1998;19:1807–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brand RA. Joint contact stress: a reasonable surrogate for biological processes? Iowa Orthop. J. 2005;25:82.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mow VC, Lai WM. Recent developments in synovial joint biomechanics. Siam Rev. 1980;22:275–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hou J, Holmes MH, Lai WM, Mow VC. Squeeze film lubrication for articular cartilage with synovial fluid. J. Biomech. 1992;25:247–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Krishnan R, Kopacz M, Ateshian GA. Experimental verification of the role of interstitial fluid pressurization in cartilage lubrication. J. Orthop. Res. 2004;22:565–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Trieu H, Qutubuddin S. Poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogels: 2. effects of processing parameters on structure and properties. Polymer. 1995;36:2531–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bahadur S. The development of transfer layers and their role in polymer tribology. Wear. 2000;245:92–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Covert RJ, Ott R, Ku DN. Friction characteristics of a potential articular cartilage biomaterial. Wear. 2003;255:1064–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gong J, Higa M, Iwasaki Y, Katsuyama Y, Osada Y. Friction of gels. J Phys Chem B. 1997;101:5487–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gong J, Osada Y. Gel friction: a model based on surface repulsion and adsorption. J Chem Phys. 1998;109:8062–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jones ES. Joint lubrication. Lancet. 1936;227:1043–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Forsey RW, Fisher J, Thompson J, Stone MH, Bell C, Ingham E. The effect of hyaluronic acid and phospholipid based lubricants on friction within a human cartilage damage model. Biomaterials. 2006;27:4581–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sasada T. Surface gel hydration lubrication in animal joints. J Jpn Soc Tribol. 2007;52:573–8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sasada T. Lubrication of human joints-nature of joint friction and “surface gel hydration lubrication”. J Jpn Soc Clin Biomech. 2000;21:17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jacko M, Tsang P, Rhee S. Wear debris compaction and friction film formation of polymer composites. Wear. 1989;133:23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zuo Z, Yang Y, Qi X, Su W, Yang X. Analysis of the chemical composition of the PTFE transfer film produced by sliding against Q235 carbon steel. Wear. 2014;320:87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Unal H, Mimaroglu A. Friction and wear performance of polyamide 6 and graphite and wax polyamide 6 composites under dry sliding conditions. Wear. 2012;289:132–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tanaka K, Uchiyama Y, Toyooka S. The mechanism of wear of polytetrafluoroethylene. Wear. 1973;23:153–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Harris KL, Pitenis AA, Sawyer WG, Krick BA, Blackman GS, Kasprzak DJ, et al. PTFE tribology and the role of mechanochemistry in the development of protective surface films. Macromolecules. 2015;48:3739–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Laux K, Schwartz C. Effects of contact pressure, molecular weight, and supplier on the wear behavior and transfer film of polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Wear. 2013;297:919–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Special Fund for Postdoctoral Innovative Project of Shandong Province (No. 201203029) and Doctoral Foundation of Qingdao University of Science and Technology (No. 0022642).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, F., Wang, A. & Wang, C. Analysis of friction between articular cartilage and polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel artificial cartilage. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 27, 87 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-016-5700-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-016-5700-y

Keywords

Navigation