3D fibre deposition and stereolithography techniques for the design of multifunctional nanocomposite magnetic scaffolds

  • Roberto De SantisEmail author
  • Ugo D’Amora
  • Teresa Russo
  • Alfredo Ronca
  • Antonio Gloria
  • Luigi Ambrosio
Special Issue: ESB 2015 Engineering and Nano-Engineering Approaches for Medical Devices
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Special Issue: ESB 2015


Magnetic nanocomposite scaffolds based on poly(ε-caprolactone) and poly(ethylene glycol) were fabricated by 3D fibre deposition modelling (FDM) and stereolithography techniques. In addition, hybrid coaxial and bilayer magnetic scaffolds were produced by combining such techniques. The aim of the current research was to analyse some structural and functional features of 3D magnetic scaffolds obtained by the 3D fibre deposition technique and by stereolithography as well as features of multimaterial scaffolds in the form of coaxial and bilayer structures obtained by the proper integration of such methods. The compressive mechanical behaviour of these scaffolds was investigated in a wet environment at 37 °C, and the morphological features were analysed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray micro-computed tomography. The capability of a magnetic scaffold to absorb magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) in water solution was also assessed. confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to assess the in vitro biological behaviour of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) seeded on 3D structures. Results showed that a wide range of mechanical properties, covering those spanning hard and soft tissues, can be obtained by 3D FDM and stereolithography techniques. 3D virtual reconstruction and SEM showed the precision with which the scaffolds were fabricated, and a good-quality interface between poly(ε-caprolactone) and poly(ethylene glycol) based scaffolds was observed for bilayer and coaxial scaffolds. Magnetised scaffolds are capable of absorbing water solution of MNPs, and a preliminary information on cell adhesion and spreading of hMSCs was obtained without the application of an external magnetic field.


Compressive Modulus Fuse Deposition Modelling Brazilian Test Porous Cylinder Neodymium Magnet 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This research was partially supported by Project Grant PRIN 2010 - 2010L9SH3K_008.


  1. 1.
    Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E. Bone substitutes: an update. Injury. 2005;36:S20–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science. 1993;260:920–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fong ELS, Watson BM, Kasper FK, Mikos AG. Building bridges: leveraging interdisciplinary collaborations in the development of biomaterials to meet clinical needs. Adv Mater. 2012;24:4995–5013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thambyah A, Pereira BP, Wyss U. Estimation of bone-on-bone contact forces in the tibiofemoral joint during walking. Knee. 2005;12:383–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klein-Nulend J, Bacabac RG, Mullender MG. Mechanobiology of bone tissue. Pathol Biol Paris. 2005;53:576–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rezwan K, Chen QZ, Blaker JJ, Boccaccini AR. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3413–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Santis R, Gloria A, Russo T, D’Amora U, D’Antò V, Bollino F, Catauro M, Mollica F, Rengo S, Ambrosio L. PCL loaded with sol–gel synthesized organic–inorganic hybrid fillers: from the analysis of 2D substrates to the design of 3D rapid prototyped composite scaffolds for tissue engineering. AIP Conf Proc. 2012;1459:26–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hollister SJ. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater. 2005;4:518–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Russo T, Gloria A, D’Antò V, D’Amora U, Ametrano G, Bollino F, De Santis R, Ausanio G, Catauro M, Rengo S, Ambrosio L. Poly(ε-caprolactone) reinforced with sol–gel synthesized organic–inorganic hybrid fillers as composite substrates for tissue engineering. J Appl Biomater Biomech. 2010;8:146–52.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gloria A, De Santis R, Ambrosio L. Polymer-based composite scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Appl Biomater Biomech. 2010;8:57–67.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Santis R, Gloria A, Russo T, D’Amora U, D’Antò V, Bollino F, Catauro M, Mollica F, Rengo S, Ambrosio L. Advanced composites for hard-tissue engineering based on PCL/organic–inorganic hybrid fillers: from the design of 2D substrates to 3D rapid prototyped scaffolds. Polym Compos. 2013;34:1413–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim TG, Shin H, Lim DW. Biomimetic scaffolds for tissue engineering. Adv Funct Mater. 2012;22:2446–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laschke MW, Harder Y, Amon M, Martin I, Farhadi J, Ring A, Torio-Padron N, Schramm R, Rücker M, Junker D, Häufel JM, Carvalho C, Heberer M, Germann G, Vollmar B, Menger MD. Angiogenesis in tissue engineering: breathing life into constructed tissue substitutes. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:2093–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sachlos E, Czernuske JT. Making tissue engineering scaffold work: review on the application of SFF technology to the production of tissue engineering scaffolds. Eur Cell Mat. 2003;5:29–40.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hutmacher DW, Schantz T, Zein I, Ng KW, Teoh SH, Tan KC. Mechanical properties and cell cultural response of polycaprolactone scaffolds designed and fabricated via fused deposition modelling. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;55:203–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peltola SM, Melchels FPW, Grijpma DK, Kellomäki M. A review of rapid prototyping techniques for tissue engineering purposes. Ann Med. 2008;40:268–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hull C. Method for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. US Patent 4929402, 1990.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Scott CS. Apparatus and method for creating three-dimensional objects. US Patent 5121329, 1991.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zein I, Hutmacher DW, Tan KC, Teoh SH. Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials. 2002;23(4):1169–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chua CK, Leong KF, Lim CS. Liquid based rapid prototyping system. In: Chua CK, Leong KF, Lim CS, editors. Rapid prototyping - principles and applications. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.; 2003. p. 35–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ito A, Ino K, Hayashida M, Kobayashi T, Matsunuma H, Kagami H, Ueda M, Honda H. Novel methodology for fabrication of tissue-engineered tubular constructs using magnetite nanoparticles and magnetic force. Tissue Eng. 2005;11:1553–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bock N, Riminucci A, Dionigi C, Russo A, Tampieri A, Landi E, Goranov VA, Marcacci M, Dediu V. A novel route in bone tissue engineering: magnetic biomimetic scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:786–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    De Santis R, Gloria A, Russo T, D’Amora U, Zeppetelli S, Tampieri A, Herrmannsdörfer T, Ambrosio L. A route toward the development of 3D magnetic scaffolds with tailored mechanical and morphological properties for hard tissue regeneration: preliminary study. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2011;6:189–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gloria A, Russo T, D’Amora U, Zeppetelli S, D’Alessandro T, Sandri M, Bañobre-López M, Piñeiro-Redondo Y, Uhlarz M, Tampieri A, Rivas J, Herrmannsdörfer T, Dediu VA, Ambrosio L, De Santis R. Magnetic poly (ε-caprolactone)/iron-doped hydroxyapatite nanocomposite substrates for advanced bone tissue engineering. J R Soc Interf. 2013;10(80):20120833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Banobre-Lopez M, Pineiro-Redondo Y, De Santis R, Gloria A, Ambrosio L, Tampieri A, Dediu V, Rivas J. Poly(caprolactone) based magnetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Appl Phys. 2011;109:07B313.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Banobre-Lopez M, Pineiro-Redondo Y, Sandri M, Tampieri A, De Santis R, Dediu VA, Rivas J. Hyperthermia induced in magnetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. IEEE Trans Magn. 2014;50:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    De Santis R, Russo A, Gloria A, D’Amora U, Russo T, Panseri S, Sandri M, Tampieri A, Marcacci M, Dediu VA, Wilde CJ, Ambrosio L. Towards the design of 3D fiber-deposited poly (ε-caprolactone)/iron-doped hydroxyapatite nanocomposite magnetic scaffolds for bone regeneration. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2015;11:1236–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Melchels FPW, Bertoldi K, Gabbrielli R, Velders AH, Feijen J, Grijpma DW. Mathematically defined tissue engineering scaffold architectures prepared by stereolithography. Biomaterials. 2010;31:6909–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gandy PJF, Cvijović D, Mackay AL, Klinowski J. Exact computation of the triply periodic D diamond minimal surface. Chem Phys Lett. 1999;314:543–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    De Santis R, Ambrosio L, Mollica F, Netti P, Nicolais L. Mechanical properties of human mineralized connective tissues. In: Mollica F, Preziosi L, Rajagopal KR, editors. Modeling of biological materials. Boston: Birkhäuser; 2007. p. 211–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto De Santis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ugo D’Amora
    • 1
  • Teresa Russo
    • 1
  • Alfredo Ronca
    • 1
  • Antonio Gloria
    • 1
  • Luigi Ambrosio
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Polymers, Composites and BiomaterialsNational Research Council of ItalyNaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of Chemical Science and Materials TechnologyNational Research Council of ItalyRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations