Inflammatory cytokine release is affected by surface morphology and chemistry of titanium implants
- 440 Downloads
To investigate in vitro cellular cytokine expression in relation to commercially pure titanium discs, comparing a native surface to a fluorinated oxide nanotube surface. Control samples pure titanium discs with a homogenous wave of the margins and grooves and an often smeared-out surface structure. Test samples pure titanium discs with a fluorinated titanium oxide chemistry and surface morphology with nanopore/tube geometry characterized by ordered structures of nanotubes with a diameter of ≈120 nm, a spacing of ≈30 nm, and a wall thickness of ≈10 nm. Cross-section view showed vertically aligned nanotubes with similar lengths of ≈700 nm. Peripheral blood mononuclear leucocytes were cultured for 1, 3, and 6 days according to standard procedures. BioPlex Pro™ assays were used for analysis and detection of cytokines. Selected inflammatory cytokines are reported. A pronounced difference in production of the inflammatogenic cytokines was observed. Leucocytes exposed to control coins produced significantly more TNF-α, IL-1ß, and IL-6 than the test nanotube coins. The effect on the TH2 cytokine IL-4 was less pronounced at day 6 compared to days 1 and 3, and slightly higher expressed on the control coins. The morphology and surface chemistry of the titanium surface have a profound impact on basic cytokine production in vitro. Within the limitations of the present study, it seems that the fluorinated oxide nanotube surface results in a lower inflammatory response compared to a rather flat surface that seems to favour inflammation.
KeywordsTitanium Surface TiO2 Nanotubes Titanium Implant Mononuclear Leucocyte Lower Inflammatory Response
We thank Wilhelm & Martina Lundgrens Science Fund and the TUA “Agreement concerning research and education of doctors”, 20140225TUAGBG-365041, Göteborg, Sweden for financial support.
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interests exists.
- 1.Sul Y-T, Johansson CB, Petronis S, Krozer A, Jeong Y, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown: the oxide thickness, micropore configurations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical composition. Biomaterials. 2002;23:491–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Hunt JA, Abrams K, Williams DF. Modelling the pattern of cell distribution around implanted materials. Anal Chem Pathol. 1994;7:43–52.Google Scholar
- 3.Moucha CS, Einhorn TA. Enhancement of skeletal repair. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM, Trafton PG, editors. Skeletal trauma. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2003. p. 639–59.Google Scholar
- 6.Sul YT, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Cho L-R, Jang B-S, Albrektsson T. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Int J Oral Maxillofacc Implant. 2005;20(3):349–59.Google Scholar
- 8.Rajyalakshmi A, Ercan B, Balasubramanian K, Webster T. Reduced adhesion of macrophages on anodized titanium with selected nanotube surface features. Int J Nanomed. 2011;6:1765–71.Google Scholar
- 13.Jacobsen SS, Larsen A, Stoltenberg M, Bruun JM, Soballe K. Effects of as-cast and wrought cobalt-chrome-molybdenum and titanium-aluminium-vanadium alloys on cytokine gene expression and protein secretion in J774A.1 macrophages. Eur Cells Mater. 2007;14:45–55.Google Scholar
- 20.Chang PC, Lang NP, Giannobile WV. Review. Evaluation of functional dynamics during osseointegration and regeneration associated with oral implants Clin Oral Implant Res. 2010;21:1–12.Google Scholar
- 27.Omar O, Svensson S, Zoric N, Lennerås M, Suska F, Wigren S, Hall J, Nannmark U, Thomsen P. In vivo gene expression in response to anodically oxodozed versus machined titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;92:1552–66.Google Scholar