Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

, Volume 24, Issue 11, pp 2645–2649 | Cite as

Going out on a limb about regrowing an arm

Article

Abstract

Starting with the observations that fetuses effortlessly grow limbs, fetuses heal wounds without scar and children up to the age of two can partially regrow amputated digits, the potential for adult humans to regrow limbs is explored. The process of limb growth in amphibians is reviewed with these steps summarizing the process: blood vessels contract to minimize bleeding; the injury site is covered by skin cells transforming into the apical epithelial cap which sends signals important for the next phases of the regrowth; resident fibroblasts leave the surrounding extracellular matrix and migrate across the amputation surface; migratory fibroblasts proliferate and dedifferentiate to form an aggregation of stemlike cells called the blastema; and the blastema coordinates the formation of a new limb. Other factors contributing to this process are: innervation, cell spatial “memory,” chemical signals between cells, gene up and down regulation, cell differentiation (or dedifferentiation) and inflammatory cells. Remarkable discoveries have been made in all these areas in the last few years that might be integrated into technology for limb regeneration. In particular, the demonstration of the plasticity of supposedly “terminally differentiated” cells speak to the idea that mature cells at the amputation site might be harnessed for limb regrowth. Also, the demonstration that macrophages can be driven to a regenerative phenotype (M2) and they may also be stem-like is promising for complex regenerations. This article posits that scientific discoveries useful for limb regeneration have been made and now it is time to develop technology exploiting these discoveries to regrow limbs.

References

  1. 1.
    Alibardi L. Ultrastructural features of the process of wound healing after tail and limb amputation in lizard. Acta Zoologica. 2010;91:306–18. doi:10.1111/j.1463-6395.2009.00409.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Muneoka K, Han M, Gardiner DM. Regrowing human limbs. Sci Am. 2008;298(4):56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carmeliet P, Tessier-Lavigne M. Common mechanisms of nerve and blood vessel wiring. Nature (London). 2005;436(7048):193–200. doi:10.1038/nature03875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhu W, Kuo D, Nathanson J, Satoh A, Pao GM, Yeo GW, et al. Retrotransposon long interspersed nucleotide element-1 (LINE-1) is activated during salamander limb regeneration. Dev Growth Differ. 2012;54(7):673–85. doi:10.1111/j.1440-169X.2012.01368.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sica A, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J Clin Investig. 2012;122(3):787–95. doi:10.1172/JCI59643DS1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hu Y, Zhang H, Lu Y, Bai H, Xu Y, Zhu X, et al. Class A scavenger receptor attenuates myocardial infarction-induced cardiomyocyte necrosis through suppressing M1 macrophage subset polarization. Basic Res Cardiol. 2011;106(6):1311–28. doi:10.1007/s00395-011-0204-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murray PJ, Wynn TA. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(11):723–37. doi:10.1038/nri3073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ruffell D, Mourkioti F, Gambardella A, Kirstetter P, Lopez RG, Rosenthal N, et al. A CREB-C/EBPbeta cascade induces M2 macrophage-specific gene expression and promotes muscle injury repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(41):17475–80. doi:10.1073/pnas.0908641106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mooney JE, Rolfe BE, Osborne GW, Sester DP, Van Rooijen N, Campbell GR, et al. Cellular plasticity of inflammatory myeloid cells in the peritoneal foreign body response. Am J Pathol. 2010;176(1):369–80. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2010.090545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Charriere G, Cousin B, Arnaud E, Saillanbarreau C, Andre M, Massoudi A, et al. Macrophage characteristics of stem cells revealed by transcriptome profiling. Exp Cell Res. 2006;312(17):3205–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Biswas SK, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and interaction with lymphocyte subsets: cancer as a paradigm. Nat Immunol. 2010;11(10):889–96. doi:10.1038/ni.1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131(5):861–72. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yamanaka S. A fresh look at iPS cells. Cell. 2009;137(1):13–7. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Engel FB. p38 MAP kinase inhibition enables proliferation of adult mammalian cardiomyocytes. Genes Dev. 2005;19(10):1175–87. doi:10.1101/gad.1306705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Selvaraj V, Plane JM, Williams AJ, Deng W. Switching cell fate: the remarkable rise of induced pluripotent stem cells and lineage reprogramming technologies. Trends Biotechnol. 2010;28(4):214–23. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fukano Y, Usui ML, Underwood RA, Isenhath S, Marshall AJ, Hauch KD, et al. Epidermal and dermal integration into sphere-templated porous poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) implants in mice. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2010;94(4):1172–86.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marshall AJ, Irvin CA, Barker T, Sage EH, Hauch KD, Ratner BD. Biomaterials with tightly controlled pore size that promote vascular in-growth. ACS Polym Prepr. 2004;45(2):100–1.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Madden LR, Mortisen DJ, Sussman EM, Dupras SK, Fugate JA, Cuy JL, et al. Proangiogenic scaffolds as functional templates for cardiac tissue engineering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(34):15211–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Badylak S, Valentin J, Ravindra A, Mccabe G, Stewart-Akers A. Macrophage phenotype as a determinant of biologic scaffold remodeling. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008;14(11):1835–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Bioengineering and Chemical EngineeringUniversity of Washington Engineered Biomaterials (UWEB21), University of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations