Skip to main content

Examining porous bio-active glass as a potential osteo-odonto-keratoprosthetic skirt material

Abstract

Bio-active glass has been developed for use as a bone substitute with strong osteo-inductive capacity and the ability to form strong bonds with soft and hard tissue. The ability of this material to enhance tissue in-growth suggests its potential use as a substitute for the dental laminate of an osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis. A preliminary in vitro investigation of porous bio-active glass as an OOKP skirt material was carried out. Porous glass structures were manufactured from bio-active glasses 1-98 and 28-04 containing varying oxide formulation (1-98, 28-04) and particle size range (250–315 μm for 1-98 and 28-04a, 315–500 μm for 28-04b). Dissolution of the porous glass structure and its effect on pH was measured. Structural 2D and 3D analysis of porous structures were performed. Cell culture experiments were carried out to study keratocyte adhesion and the inflammatory response induced by the porous glass materials. The dissolution results suggested that the porous structure made out of 1-98 dissolves faster than the structures made from glass 28-04. pH experiments showed that the dissolution of the porous glass increased the pH of the surrounding solution. The cell culture results showed that keratocytes adhered onto the surface of each of the porous glass structures, but cell adhesion and spreading was greatest for the 98a bio-glass. Cytokine production by all porous glass samples was similar to that of the negative control indicating that the glasses do not induce a cytokine driven inflammatory response. Cell culture results support the potential use of synthetic porous bio-glass as an OOKP skirt material in terms of limited inflammatory potential and capacity to induce and support tissue ingrowth.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  1. Chirila TV, et al. Artificial cornea. Prog Polym Sci. 1998;23:447–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Langefeld S, Kompa S, Redbrake C, Brenman K, Kirchhof B, Schrage NF. Aachen keratoprosthesis as temporary implant for combined vitreoretinal surgery and keratoplasty: report on 10 clinical applications. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238:722–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chirila TV. An overview of the development of artificial corneas with porous skirts and the use of PHEMA for such an application. Biomaterials. 2001;22:3311–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim MK, Lee JL, Wee WR, Lee JH. Seoul-type keratoprosthesis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:761–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruin P, Meeuwsen EAJ, van Andel MV, Worst JGF, Pennings AJ. Autoclavable highly cross-linked polyurethane networks in ophthalmology. Biomaterials. 1993;14:1089–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pruitt LA. Fluorocarbon polymers in biomedical engineering. Encycl Mat Sci Tech. 2008;3216-21.

  7. Renard G, Cetinel B, Legeais JM, Savoldelli M, Durand J, Pouliquen Y. Incorporation of a fluorocarbon polymer implanted at the posterior surface of the rabbit cornea. J Biomed Mat Res. 1996;31:193–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Caiazza S, Fanizza C, Mazziotti I, Pintucci S, Tomaino MA. Light and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the Dacron felt as the haptic part of an improved keratoprosthesis. An in vitro and in vivo study. Clin Mat. 1988;3:33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Trinkaus-Randall V, Capecchi J, Sammon L, Gibbons D, Leibowitz HM, Franzblau C. In vitro evaluation of fibroplasia in a porous polymer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:1321–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Trinkaus-Randall V, Banwatt R, Capecchi J, Leibowitz HM, Franzblau C. In vivo fibroplasia of a porous polymer in the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:3245–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kain HL. The development of the silicone-carbon keratoprothesis. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;9:209–10.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ciolino JB, Dohlman CH. Biologic keratoprosthesis materials. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2009;49(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Miyashita H, et al. Collagen-immobilized poly(vinyl alcohol) as an artificial cornea scaffold that supports a stratified corneal epithelium. J Biomed Mat Res. 2006;76B:56–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Xie RZ, Sweeney DF, Beumer GJ, Johnson G, Griesser HJ, Steele JG. Effects of biologically modified surfaces of synthetic lenticules on corneal epithelialization in vivo. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1997;25(Suppl):46–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kobayashi H, Ikada Y. Corneal cell adhesion and proliferation on hydrogel sheets bound with cell-adhesive proteins. Curr Eye Res. 1991;10:899–908.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pettit DK, Horbett TA, Hoffman AS, Chan KY. Quantitation of rabbit corneal epithelial cell outgrowth on polymeric substrates in vitro. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:2269–77.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ohji M, Mandarino L, SundarRaj N, Thoft RA. Corneal epithelial cell attachment with endogenous laminin and fibronectin. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:2487–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Strampelli B. Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis. Ann Ottalmol Clin Ocul. 1963;89:1039.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ricci R, Pecorella I, Ciardi A, Della RC, Di Tondo U, Marchi V. Strampelli’s osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis. Clinical and histological long-term features of three prostheses. British J Ophthalmol. 1992;76:232–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Karlsson KH, Ylänen H, Aro H. Porous bone implants. Ceram Int. 2000;26:897–900.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang D, Vedel E, Hupa L, Aro HT. Predicting physical and chemical properties of bio-active glasses from chemical composition. Part III. In vitro reactivity of glasses. Glass Tech Eur J Glass Sci Tech. 2009;50(1):1–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hench LL, Andersson Ö. “Bio-active glasses” an introduction to bioceramics. In: Hench LL, Wilson J, editors. Advanced series in ceramics – vol. 1. Singapore: World Scientific; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Linnola RJ, Happonen RP, Andersson ÖH, Vedel E, Yli-Urpo AU, Krause U, Laatikainen L. Titanium and bio-active glass–ceramic coated titanium as materials for keratoprosthesis. Exp Eye Res. 1996;63:471–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Arstila H, Vedel E, Hupa L, Hupa M. Predicting physical and chemical properties of bio-active glasses from chemical composition. Part II. Devitrification characteristics. Glass Tech Eur J Glass Sci Tech. 2008;49(6):251–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Arstila H, Vedel E, Hupa L, Hupa M. Predicting physical and chemical properties of bio-active glasses from chemical composition. Part 2: Devitrification characteristics. Glass Tech Eur J Glass Sci Tech. 2009;49(6):260–5.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lentner C. Geigy scientific tables, vol. 1. Units of measurements, Body fluid, Composition of body, and Nutrition. West Galdwell: Giba-Geigy; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Viitala R, Franklin V, Green D, Liu C, Lloyd A, Tighe B. Towards a synthetic osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:438–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang D, Leppäranta O, Munukka E, Ylänen H, Viljanen MK, Eerola E, Hupa M, Hupa L. Antibacterial effects and dissolution behavior of six bio-active glasses. J Biomed Mat Res. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32564.

  29. Hoppe A, Guldal NS, Boccaccini AR. A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bio-active glasses and glass–ceramics. Biomaterials. 2011;32:2757–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Academy of Finland (Project no: 114117) is acknowledged for financial support. Jessica Alm is thanked for advice on cell culture on bio-active glasses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Sandeman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huhtinen, R., Sandeman, S., Rose, S. et al. Examining porous bio-active glass as a potential osteo-odonto-keratoprosthetic skirt material. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 24, 1217–1227 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-4881-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-4881-x

Keywords

  • PMMA
  • Average Pore Size
  • Porous Glass
  • Glass Structure
  • PHEMA