Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improvement in adhesion of the brackets to the tooth by sandblasting treatment

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In oral orthodontic treatments, achievement of a good adhesion between brackets and teeth surfaces is essential. One way to increase adhesion is to apply a surface treatment of teeth facing surfaces through the projection of abrasive particles to produce a surface roughness which improves adhesion of the bracket to the tooth, because of the significantly increased contact between the two surfaces. The effect on adhesion through the use of this technique in different types of brackets, as well as through the use of different blasting particles, however, is yet not well described. In this study we have included three types of brackets which are commonly used in orthodontic therapies (two of them a mesh-type and the third one a micro-milled type) with a contact surface area of 11.16, 8.85 and 6.89 mm2 respectively. These brackets were used combined with a sandblasting treatment with two different types of abrasive particles, alumina (Al2O3) and silicon carbide (SiC) and applied to natural teeth in vitro. The abrasive particles used are bio-compatible and usually used in achieving increased roughness for improved adherence in biomedical materials. Sandblasting was performed at 2 bars for 2 s; three particle sizes were used: 80, 200 and 600 μm. Non-blasted samples were used as control. Each of the pieces were cemented to natural teeth with a self-curing composite. Samples were stored in physiologic serum at 5°C temperature. Tensile tests were performed with a universal testing machine. Brackets treated with sandblasted particles were measured to have an increased adhesion as compared to the control sample. The highest bond strength was measured for samples sandblasted with alumina particles of 80 and 200 μm combined with micro-milled brackets. The recorded stresses did not exceed the tensile strength of tooth enamel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schmage P, Nergiz I, Herrmann W, Ozcan M. Influence of various surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123(5):540–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cochran D, O’keefe KL, Turner DT, Powers JM. Bond strength of orthodontic composite cement to treated porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111(3):297–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Silverstone LM. In: Dogon L, editor. The acid etch technique: in vitro study with special reference to the enamel surface and the enamel-resin interface. Minnesota: St. Paul; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sargison AE, Mccabe JF, Millett DT. A laboratory investigation to compare enamel preparation by sandblasting or acid etching prior to bracket bonding. Br J Orthod. 1999;26(2):141–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Siomka LV, Powers JM. In vitro bond strength of treated direct-bonding metal bases. Am J Orthod. 1995;88:133–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sonis AL. Air abrasion of failed bonded metal brackets: a study of shear bond strength and surface characteristics as determined by scanning electron microscopy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:96–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dasch W, Turner DS, Powers JM. Bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer orthodontic adhesive. J Dent Res. 1993;72:224–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wright WL, Powers JM. In vitro tensile bond strength of reconditioned brackets. Am J Orthod. 1985;87:247–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Egan FR, Alexander SA, Cartwright GE. Bond strength of rebonded brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109:64–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Black RB. Air-abrasive: some fundamentals. J Am Dent Assoc. 1950;40:701–10.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Millett D, Mccabe JF, Gordon PH. The role of sandblasting on the retention of metallic brackets applied with glass ionomer cement. Br J Orthod. 1993;20(2):117–222.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Regan D, Lemasney B, Van-Noort R. The tensile bond strength of new and rebonded stainless steel orthodontic brackets. Eur J Orthod. 1993;15(2):125–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller S, Zernik JH. Sandblasting of bands to increase bond strength. J Clini Orthod. 1996;30:217–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jost-Brinkmann PG, Miethke RR, Appenzeller AH. An in vitro study on improving the bonding strength of steel bands with the use of glass ionomer cements. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1993;54:148–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zachrisson YO, Zachrisson BU, Buyukyilmaz T. Surface preparation for orthodontic bonding to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109(4):420–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cochran D, O’keefe KL, Turner DT. Bond strength f orthodontics composite cement to treated porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:297–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. López Barajas L, Canut Brusola JA. In vitro comparison of the retention capacity of new aesthetics brackets. Eur J Orthod. 1999;21:71–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maccoll GA, Rossouw PE, Titley KC, Yamin C. The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113(3):276–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shahverdi S, Canay S, Sahin E, Bilge A. Effects of different surface treatment methods on the bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25:699–705.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nergiz I, Schmage P, Herrmann W, Ozcan M. Effect of alloy type and surface conditioning on roughness and bond strength of metal brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125(1):42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cotton Wilkinsson J. In: Limusa, editor. Advanced Inorganic Chemistry. New York: Wiley; 1990.

  22. Cochran D, O’keefe KL, Turner DT, Powers JM. Bond strength of orthodontic composite cement to treated porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111(3):297–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma-Sayal SK, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV, Titley KC. The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124(1):74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. J. Gil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Espinar-Escalona, E., Barrera-Mora, J.M., Llamas-Carreras, J.M. et al. Improvement in adhesion of the brackets to the tooth by sandblasting treatment. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 23, 605–611 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-011-4509-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-011-4509-y

Keywords

Navigation