Skip to main content

High speed insertion of bone fracture fixation pins: a finite element penetration model with experimental comparisons

Abstract

A new method of bone fracture fixation is considered in which small pins/darts are dynamically inserted into bone to prevent translation and rotation at the fracture site. An ABAQUS model was developed to analyze dart penetration in cortical and cancellous bone for varying dart diameter, material, and velocity, and cortical thickness. The method is advocated for bioresorbable darts, so polylactide (PLA) and magnesium are the materials examined in this study. Numerical results showed that magnesium darts can achieve full penetration in bone while suffering little damage. The PLA darts penetrated thin bone well, but substantial deformation was seen as the cortical thickness increased, especially for small diameter darts. As partial validation, prototype PLA fixation darts were fired into cadaveric bone with a custom nailer. As in the model, the PLA darts could penetrate thin cortices but saw gross deformation when impacted against thicker bone.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

References

  1. Farley GL. Repairing fractured bones by use of bioabsorbable composites (NASA Technical Brief LAR-16354-1). National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center. 2006.

  2. Miller DL, Goswami T. A review of locking compression plate biomechanics and their advantages as internal fixators in fracture healing. Clin Biomech. 2007;22:1049–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ezquerro F, Jiminez S, Perez A, Prado M, de Diego G, Simon A. The influence of wire positioning upon the initial stability of scaphoid fractures fixed using Kirschner wires: a finite element study. Med Eng Phys. 2007;29:652–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gefen A. Optimizing the biomechanical compatibility of orthopaedic screws for bone fracture fixation. Med Eng Phys. 2002;24:337–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Duda GN, Kirchner H, Wilke HJ, Claes L. A method to determine the 3-D stiffness of fracture fixation devices and its application to predict inter-fragmentary movement. J Biomech. 1998;31:247–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Staiger MP, Pietak AM, Huadmai J, Dias G. Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: a review. Biomater. 2006;27:1728–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamadi S, Kobayashi S. Effects of strain rate on the mechanical properties of tricalcium phosphate/poly(L-lactide) composites. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2009;20:67–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta AP, Kumar V. New emerging trends in synthetic biodegradable polymers–polylactide: a critique. Eur Polym J. 2007;43:4053–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarasua JR, Arraiza AL. Crystallinity and mechanical properties of optically pure polylactides and their blends. Polym Eng Sci. 2005;45:745–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Claes LE, Ignatius AA, Rehm KE, Scholz C. New bioresorbable pin for the reduction of small bony fragments: design, mechanical properties and in vitro degradation. Biomater. 1996;17:1621–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wen CE, Yamada Y, Shimojima K, Chino Y, Hosokawa H, Mabuchi M. Compressibility of porous magnesium foam: dependence on porosity and pore size. Mater Lett. 2004;58:357–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Denkena B, Lucas A. Biocompatible magnesium allows as absorbable implant materials–adjusted surface and subsurface properties by machining processes. Ann CIRP. 2007;56:113–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mueller W, de Mele M, Nascimento M, Zeddies M. Degradation of magnesium and its alloys: dependence on the composition of the synthetic biological media. J Biomed Mater Res. 2009;90A:487–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Song WQ, Beggs P, Easton M. Compressive strain-rate sensitivity of magnesium-aluminum die casting alloys. Mater Des. 2009;30:642–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Witte F, Kaese V, Haferkamp H, Switzer E, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Wirth CJ, Windhagen H. In vivo corrosion of four magnesium alloys and the associated bone response. Biomater. 2005;26:3557–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu L, Yu G, Zhang E, Pan F, Yang K. In vivo corrosion behavior of Mg–Mn–Zn alloy for bone implant application. J Biomed Mater Res. 2007;83A:703–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Witte F, Fischer J, Nellesen J, Crostack HA, Kaese V, Pisch A, Beckmann F, Windhagen H. In vitro and in vivo corrosion measurements of magnesium alloys. Biomater. 2006;27:1013–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferguson SJ, Weber U, von Rechenberg B, Mayer J. Enhancing the mechanical integrity of the implant-bone interface with BoneWelding® technology: determination of Quasi-Static interfacial strength and fatigue resistance. J Biomed Mater Res Part B. 2006;77B:13–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kincaid B, Schroder L, Mason J. Measurement of orthopedic cortical bone screw insertion performance in cadaver bone and model materials. Exp Mech. 2007. doi:10.1007/s11340-007-9056-6.

  20. Newman DL, Dougherty G, Al Obaid A, Al Hajrasy H. Limitations of clinical CT in assessing cortical thickness and density. Phys Med Biol. 1998;43:619–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh S. Ultrasonic non-destructive measurements of cortical bone thickness in human cadaver femur. Ultrason. 1989;27:107–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moilanen P, Talmant M, Bousson V, Nicholson PHF, Cheng S, Timonen J, Laugier P. Ultrasonically determined thickness of long cortical bones: two-dimensional simulations of in vitro experiments. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007;122(3):1818–26.

    Google Scholar 

  23. MacNeil JA, Boyd SK. Accuracy of high-resolution peripheral qualitative computed tomography for measurement of bone quality. Med Eng Phys. 2007;29:1096–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. ABAQUS User’s Manual. ABAQUS 6.8-EF2, SIMULIA, Dassault Systemes.

  25. Li Z, Lambros J. Strain rate effects on the thermomechanical behavior of polymers. Int J Solids Struct. 2001;38:3549–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hansen U, Zioupos P, Simpson R, Currey JD, Hynd D. The effect of strain rate on the mechanical properties of human cortical bone. J Biomech Eng. 2008. doi:10.1115/1.2838032.

  27. McElhaney JH, Byars EF. Dynamic response of biological materials. In: Winter annual meeting of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME Human Factors Division. ASME. 1965.

  28. Linde F, Norgaard P, Hvid I, Odgaard A, Soballe K. Mechanical properties of trabecular bone. dependency on strain rate. J Biomech. 1991;24(9):803–9.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shim VPW, Yang LM, Lie JF, Lee VS. Characterisation of the dynamic compressive mechanical properties of cancellous bone from the human cervical spine. Int J Impact Eng. 2005;32:525–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ouyang J, Yang GT, Wu WZ, Zhu QA, Zhong SZ. Biomechanical characteristics of human trabecular bone. Clin Biomech. 1997;12:522–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Morgan EF, Keaveny TM. Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site. J Biomech. 2001;34:569–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ford CM, Keaveny TM. The dependence of shear failure properties of trabecular bone on apparent density and trabecular orientation. J Biomech. 1996;29(10):1309–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jepsen KJ, Davy DT. Comparison of damage accumulation measures in human cortical bone. J Biomech. 1997;30(9):891–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mendelson A. Elastic-plastic torsion problem for strain-hardening materials (NASA Technical Note D-4391). National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lewis Research Center. 1968.

  35. Garnier KB, Dumas R, Rumelhart C, Arlot ME. Mechanical characterization in shear of human femoral cancellous bone: torsion and shear tests. Med Eng Phys. 1999;21:641–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rincon-Kohli L, Zysset PK. Multi-axial mechanical properties of human trabecular bone. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2009;8:195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kopperdahl DL, Keaveny TM. Yield strain behaviour of trabecular bone. J Biomech. 1998;31:601–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Norman TL, Nivargikar SV, Burr DB. Resistance to crack growth in human cortical bone is greater in shear than in tension. J Biomech. 1996;29:1023–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Feng Z, Rho J, Han S, Ziv I. Orientation and loading condition dependence of fracture toughness in cortical bone. Mater Sci Eng C. 2000;11:41–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cook RB, Zioupos P. The fracture toughness of cancellous bone. J Biomech. 2009;42:2054–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tomar V. Insights into the effects of tensile and compressive loadings on microstructure dependent fracture of trabecular bone. Eng Fract Mech. 2009;76:884–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lim LT, Auras R, Rubino M. Processing technologies for poly(lactic acid). Prog Polym Sci. 2008;33:820–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Haibach R. Injection-molding degradation of biodegradable polylactide. Technical conference of the society of plastics engineers. ANTEC. 2007;4:2043–7.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Doblare M, Garcia JM, Gomez MJ. Modelling bone tissue fracture and healing: a review. Eng Fract Mech. 2004;71:1809–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shin H, Lee HJ, Yoo YH, Lee W. A determination procedure for element elimination criterion in finite element analysis of high-strain-rate impact/penetration phenomena. JSME Int J Ser A. 2004;47(1):35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Campbell J, Vignjevic R. Development of lagrangian hydrocode modelling for debris impact damage prediction. Int J Impact Eng. 1997;20:143–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen EP. Numerical simulation of penetration of aluminum targets by spherical-nose steel rods. Theor Appl Fract Mech. 1995;22:159–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. MatWeb Material Property Data: www.matweb.com. Accessed 1 Feb 2010.

  49. Dong XN, Guo XE. The dependence of transversely isotropic elasticity of human femoral cortical bone on porosity. J Biomech. 2004;37:1281–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the funding of Zimmer. The research was also supported by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, Contract W81XWH-09-1-0741. In addition the authors would like acknowledge the financial support of Professor Mark Jackson of AUT University, allowing for the collaboration between the University of Notre Dame and AUT University.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven R. Schmid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prygoski, M.P., Pasang, T., Schmid, S.R. et al. High speed insertion of bone fracture fixation pins: a finite element penetration model with experimental comparisons. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 22, 2823–2832 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-011-4461-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-011-4461-x

Keywords

  • Magnesium Alloy
  • Cortical Bone
  • Cancellous Bone
  • Cortical Thickness
  • Full Penetration