Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of gamma irradiation on physical–mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of polyurethane–polydimethylsiloxane microfibrillar vascular grafts

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Poly(ether) urethane (PEtU)–polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) based materials have been processed by a spray, phase-inversion technique to produce microfibrillar small-diameter vascular grafts; however the effect of sterilization upon these grafts is still unknown. This study investigated the effect of gamma irradiation on grafts made of PEtU–PDMS materials containing different PDMS concentrations. Sterilisation-induced changes in surface chemical structure and morphology were assessed by infrared spectroscopy, light and scanning electron microscopy. Tensile tests were used to examine changes in mechanical properties and the cytotoxicity evaluation was performed on L929 fibroblasts. The study demonstrated that physical–chemical and mechanical properties of PEtU–PDMS grafts, at each PDMS concentration, were not significantly affected by the exposure to gamma irradiation, moreover no sign of cytotoxicity was observed after sterilisation. Although in vitro experiments have been promising, further in vivo studies are necessary to evaluate the biodegradation behaviour of PEtU–PDMS graft after gamma irradiation, before any clinical application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Panayiotopoulos YP, Edmondson RA, Reidy JF, Taylor PR. A scoring system to predict the outcome of long femorodistal arterial bypass grafts to single calf or pedal vessels. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998;15:380–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor RS, Loh A, McFarland RJ, Cox M, Chester JF. Improved technique for polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting: long-term results using anastomotic vein patches. Br J Surg. 1992;79:348–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Okoshi T. New concept of microporous structure in small diameter vascular prostheses. Artif Organs. 1995;19(1):27–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Soldani G, Bernabei M, Losi P, Crucean A, Chiappino D, Burchielli S, et al. In vitro experiments and in vivo implants to evaluate a new silicone-based polyurethane material for replacement of small vessels. Cardiol Young. 2004;14:20–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Okoshi T, Soldani G, Goddard M, Galletti PM. Penetrating micropores increase patency and achieve extensive endothelialization in small diameter polymer skin coated vascular grafts. ASAIO J. 1996;42(5):M398–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Briganti E, Losi P, Raffi A, Scoccianti M, Munaò A, Soldani G. Silicone based polyurethane materials: a promising biocompatible elastomeric formulation for cardiovascular applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006;17:259–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Okoshi T, Goddard M, Galletti PM, Soldani G. In vivo evaluation of porous versus skinned polyurethane–polydimethylsiloxane small diameter vascular grafts. ASAIO Trans. 1991;37(3):M480–1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Abraham GA, Frontini PM, Cuadrado TR. Physical and mechanical behavior of sterilized biomedical segmented polyurethanes. J Appl Polym Sci. 1997;65:1193–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hirata N, Matsumoto K-I, Inishita T, Takenaka Y, Suma Y, Shintani H. Gamma-ray irradiation, autoclave and ethylene oxide sterilization to thermosetting polyurethane: sterilization to polyurethane. Radiat Phys chem. 1995;46:377–81.

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hooper KA, Cox JD, Kohn J. Comparison of the effect of ethylene oxide and γ-irradiation on selected tyrosine-derived polycarbonates and poly(l-lactic acid). J Appl Polym Sci. 1997;63:1499–510.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Soldani G. Elastomeric material and process for preparation thereof. U.S. Patent 7,157,118B2, January 2, 2007.

  12. Okoshi T, Chen H, Soldani G, Galletti PM, Goddard M. Microporous small diameter PVDF–TrFE vascular grafts fabricated by a spray phase inversion technique. ASAIO J. 1992;38(3):M201–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Soldani G. Apparatus for and method of producing porous membranes for medical use. U.S Patent 02425778.4, June 23, 2004.

  14. Soldani G, Losi P, Milioni C, Raffi A. Light microscopy evaluation of polyurethane vascular grafts porosity by Sudan Black B staining. J Microsc. 2002;206:139–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Gogolewski S, Mainil-Varlet P, Dillon JG. Sterility, mechanical properties, and molecular stability of polylactide internal-fixation devices treated with low-temperature plasmas. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996;32:227–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lamba NMK, Woodhouse KA, Cooper SL. Polyurethanes in biomedical applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hergenrother RW, Wabers HD, Cooper SL. Effect of hand segment chemistry and strain on the stability of polyurethanes: in vivo biostability. Biomaterials. 1993;14(6):449–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stokes K, McVenes R, Anderson JM. Polyurethane elastomer biostability. J Biomater Appl. 1995;9(4):321–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin DJ, Poole-Warren LA, Gunatillake PA, McCarthy SJ, Meijs GF, Schindhelm K. Polydimethylsiloxane/polyether-mixed macrodiol-based polyurethane elastomers: biostability. Biomaterials. 2000;21(10):1021–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Spiller D, Losi P, Briganti E, Sbrana S, Kull S, Martinelli I, et al. PDMS content affects in vitro hemocompatibility of synthetic vascular grafts. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18(6):1097–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rhodes NP, Bellon JM, Bujan MJ, Soldani G, Hunt JA. Inflammatory response to a novel series of siloxane-crosslinked polyurethane elastomers having controlled biodegradation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005;16:1207–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Massey LK. The effect of sterilization methods on plastics and elastomers. 2nd ed. NY: William Andrew; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tang YW, Labow RS, Santerre JP. Isolation of methylene dianiline and aqueous-soluble biodegradation products from polycarbonate–polyurethanes. Biomaterials. 2003;24:2805–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Haugen HJ, Brunner M, Pellkofer F, Aigner J, Will J, Wintermantel E. Effect of different γ- irradiation doses on cytotoxicity and material properties of porous polyether–urethane polymer. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007;80B:415–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shintani H, Nakamura A. Formation of 4, 4’-methylenedianiline in polyurethane potting materials by either γ-ray or autoclave sterilization. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25:1271–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang YZ, Bjursten LM, Freij-Larsson C, Kober M, Wesslen B. Tissue response to commercial silicone and polyurethane elastomers after different sterilisation procedures. Biomaterials. 1996;17:2265–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Marco Vaghetti MD for the precious help in the revision of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrica Briganti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Briganti, E., Kayal, T.A., Kull, S. et al. The effect of gamma irradiation on physical–mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of polyurethane–polydimethylsiloxane microfibrillar vascular grafts. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 21, 1311–1319 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-009-3943-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-009-3943-6

Keywords

Navigation