A novel bioactive three-dimensional β-tricalcium phosphate/chitosan scaffold for periodontal tissue engineering

  • Feng Liao
  • Yangyang Chen
  • Zubing Li
  • Yining Wang
  • Bin Shi
  • Zhongcheng Gong
  • Xiangrong Cheng
Article

Abstract

The development of suitable bioactive three-dimensional scaffold for the promotion of cellular proliferation and differentiation is critical in periodontal tissue engineering. In this study,porous β-tricalcium phosphate/chitosan composite scaffolds were prepared through a freeze-drying method. These scaffolds were evaluated by analysis of microscopic structure, porosity, and cytocompatibility. The gene expression of bone sialoprotein (BSP) and cementum attachment protein (CAP) was detected with RT-PCR after human periodontal ligament cells (HPLCs) were seeded in these scaffolds. Then cell–scaffold complexes were implanted subcutaneously into athymic mice. The protein expression of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and osteopontin (OPN) was detected in vivo. Results indicated that composite scaffolds displayed a homogeneous three-dimensional microstructure; suitable pore size (120 μm) and high porosity (91.07%). The composite scaffold showed higher proliferation rate than the pure chitosan scaffold, and up-regulated the gene expression of BSP and CAP. In vivo, HPLCs in the composite scaffold not only proliferated but also recruited vascular tissue ingrowth. The protein expression of ALP and OPN was up-regulated in the composite scaffold. Therefore, it was suggested that the composite scaffold could promote the differentiation of HPLCs towards osteoblast and cementoblast phenotypes.

References

  1. 1.
    Schroder NW, Meister D, Wolff V, Christan C, Kaner D, Haban V, et al. Chronic periodontal disease is associated with singlenucleotidepolymorphisms of the human TLR-4 gene. Genes Immun. 2005;6:448–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Giannopoulou C, Cimasoni G. Functional characteristics of gingival and periodontal ligament fibroblasts. J Dent Res. 1996;75:895–902.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang LH, Greenwell H, Fiorellini J, Giannobile W, Offenbacher S, Salkin L, et al. Periodontal regeneration. J Periodontol. 2005;76:1601–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nakahara T, Nakamura T, Kobayashi E, Kuremoto K, Matsuno T, Tabata Y, et al. In situ tissue engineering of periodontal tissues by seeding with periodontal ligament-derived cells. Tissue Eng. 2004;10:537–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hubbell JA. Biomaterials in tissue engineering. Biotechnology (NY). 1995;13:565–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miyazaki S, Ishii K, Nadai T. The use of chitin and chitosan as drug carriers. Chem Pharm Bull. 1981;29:3067–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Madihally SV, Matthew HW. Porous chitosan scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1133–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hammerle CH, Olah AJ, Schid J, Fluckiger L, Gogolewski S, Winkler JR, et al. The biological effect of natural bone mineral on bone neoformation on the rabbit skull. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:198–207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hench LL. Bioceramics: from concept to clinic. J Am Ceram Soc. 1991;74:1487–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brown S, Clarke I, Williams P. Bioceramics 14: proceedings of the 14th international symposium on ceramics in medicine. California: Palm Springs; 2001.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang K, Wang Y, Hillmayer MA, Francis LF. Processing a properties of porous poly (L-lactide)/bioactive glass composites. Biomaterials. 2004;25:2450–89.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang Z, Chen H, Li CK. The methods of alkaline phosphatase staining. In: Zhang Z, Chen H, editors. The manual of pathological staining technique. Liaoning: Liaoning scientific and technical publishing house; 1988. p. 254–5.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang Y, Zhang M. Syhthesis and characterization of macroporous chitosan/calcium phoshpate composite scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;55:304–12.CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Somerman MJ, Young MF, Foster RA, Moehring JM, Imm G, Sauk JJ. Characteristics of human periodontal ligament cells in vitro. Arch Oral Biol. 1990;35:241–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ma PX, Langer R. Fabrication of biodegradable polymer foams for cell transplantation and tissue engineering. In: Yarmush M, Morgan J, editors. Tissue engineering methods and protocols. Totowa NJ: Humana Press Inc; 1999. p. 47–56.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Finn AR, Bell HW, Brammer AJ. Interpositional “grafting” with autogenous bone and coralline hydroxyapatite. J Maxillofac Surg. 1980;8:217–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nehrer S, Breinan HA, Ramappa A, Young G, Shorkroff S, Louie LK, et al. Matrix collagen type and pore size influence behavior of seeded canine chondrocytes. Biomaterials. 1997;18:769–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    O’Brien FJ, Harley BA, Yannas IV, Gibson LJ. The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2005;26:433–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Taba M, Jin Q, Sugai VJ, Giannobile VW. Current concepts in periodontal bioengineering. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2005;8:292–302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seo BM, Miura M, Gronthos S, Bartold PM, Batouli S, Brahim J, et al. Investigation of multipotent postnatal stem cells from human periodontal ligament. Lancet. 2004;364:149–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roach HI. Why does bone matrix contain non-collagenous proteins? The possible roles of osteocalcin, osteonectin, osteopontin and bone sialoprotein in bone mineralisation and resorption. Cell Biol Int. 1994;18:617–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Arzate H, Olson SW, Page RC, Gown AM, Narayanan AS. Production of a monoclonal antibody to an attachment protein derived from human cementum. FASEB J. 1992;6:2990–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Franceschi RT, Iyer BS. Relationship between collagen synthesis and expression of the osteoblast phenotype in MC3T3-E1 cells. J Bone Miner Res. 1992;7:235–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miao D, Scutt A. Histochemical localization of alkaline phosphatase activity in decalcified bone and cartilage. J Histochem Cytochem. 2002;50:333–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sculean A, Windisch P, Chiantella GC, Donos N, Brecx M, Reich E. Treatment of intrabony defects with enamel matrix proteins and Guided tissue regeneration. A prospective controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2001;28:397–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2000;21:667–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Foster BL, Nociti FH Jr, Swanson EC, Matsa-Dunn D, Berry JE, Cupp CJ, et al. Regulation of cementoblast gene expression by inorganic phosphate in vitro. Calcif Tissue Int. 2006;78:103–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Feng Liao
    • 1
  • Yangyang Chen
    • 2
  • Zubing Li
    • 1
  • Yining Wang
    • 1
  • Bin Shi
    • 1
  • Zhongcheng Gong
    • 1
  • Xiangrong Cheng
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Key Laboratory for Oral Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, School and Hospital of StomatologyWuhan UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Oncology, Tongji HospitalHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of Prosthodontics, School and Hospital of StomatologyWuhan UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations