Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In vivo behaviour of two different biphasic ceramic implanted in mandibular bone of dogs

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alloplastic calcium phosphate bone substitutes such as hydroxyapatite (HA) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP) have been studied extensively due to their composition closely resembling the inorganic phase of bone tissue. On the same way, by manipulating the HA/TCP ratio it may be possible to change the substitution rate and the bioactivity of these materials, an advantage which has brought them to clinical use in oral and orthopaedic surgery. In this work, we evaluated the histological response in bone of two biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics by varying the proportion of their components. All premolars of 6 beagle dogs were removed from both sides of the mandible. Three months later, four cylinders composed of 85% HA and 15% β-TCP (BCP 1) were implanted in the right side of mandible and other four cylinders composed of 15% HA and 85% β-TCP (BCP 2) were implanted in the left side of mandible of dogs for 4, 12 ad 26 weeks, respectively. Two dogs were used in each time point. The histological study indicated that both biphasic ceramic were biocompatible. The earlier and more quantity of bone formed in BCP 2 than in BCP 1 suggested that the first one had a higher osteoinductive potential than the second one in mandibular bone. The resorption of the phosphate phase and the subsequent migration of bone into the resorbed portions were detected in both biphasic ceramics although two processes appeared faster in BCP 2 than in BCP 1. These dates conclude that varying the components of our biphasic ceramic we improve its osteoinductive potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Develioglu, S.Ü. Saraydin, L. Dupoirieux, Z.D. Sahin, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 80, 505 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Yuan, C.A. Van Blitterswijk, K. De Groot, J.D. De Brujin, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 78, 139 (2006)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. R.R. Betz, Orthopedics. 25, 561 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. S.N. Parik, J. Postgrad. Med. 48, 142 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. S.N. Khan, E. Tomin, J.M. Lane, Orthop. Clin. North Am. 31, 389 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Yuan, K. Kurashina, J.D. De Brujin, Y. Li, K. De Groot, X. Zhang, Biomaterials 20, 1799 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Vallet-Regí, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2, 97 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. O. Gauthier, E. Goyenvalle, J.-M. Bouler, J. Guicheux, P. Pilet, P. Weiss, G. Daculsi, J. Mat. Sci. Mat. Med. 12, 385 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Daculsi, Biomaterials 19, 1473 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. L.L. Hench, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 1487 (1991)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Develioglu, S.Ü. Saraydin, G. Bolayir, L. Dupoirieux, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 77, 627 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. B.S. Chang, C.K. Lee, K.S. Hong, H.J. Youn, H.S. Ryu, S.S. Chung, K.W. Park, Biomaterials 21, 1291 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. O. Gauthier, J.M. Bouler, E. Aguado, P. Pilet, G Daculsi, Biomaterials 19, 133 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. G. Daculsi, R.Z. Geros, E. Nery, K. Lynch, B. Kerebel, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 23, 883 (1989)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. P. Habibovic, T.M. Sees, M.A. Van Den Doel, C.A. Van Blitterswijk, K. De Groot, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 77, 747 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Habibovic, H. Yuan, C.M. Van Der Valk, G. Meijer, C.A. Van Blitterswik, K. De Groot, Biomaterials 26, 3565 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. H. Yuan, J.D. De Bruijn, Y. Li, J. Feng, Z. Yang, K. De Groot, X. Zhang, J. Mat. Sci. Mat. Med. 12, 7 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. M.A. Merkx, J.C. Maltha, H.P. Freihofer, A.M. Kujpers-Jagtman, Biomaterials 20, 2029 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Daculsi, R.Z. Legeros, M. Heughebaert, I. Barbieux, Calcif. Tissue Int. 46, 20 (1990)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. G. Daculsi, N. Passuti, Biomaterials 11, 86 (1990)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. H. Yuan, M. Van Den Doel, S. Li, C.A. Van Blitterswijk, K. De Groot, J.D. De Bruijn, J. Mat. Sci. Mat. Med. 13, 1271 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. D.J. Bell, J. Prosthet. Dent. 56, 322 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M.S. Block, J.N. Kent, J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 44, 44 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. Habibovic, H. Yuan, M. Van Den Doel, T.M. Sees, C.A. Van Blitterswijk, K. De Groot, J. Orthop. Res. 24, 867 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. C. Schopper, F. Ziya-Ghazvini, W. Goriwoda, D. Moser, F. Wanschitz, E. Spassova, G. Lagogiannis, A. Auterith, R. Ewers, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 4, 458 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. V. Karageorgiu, D. Kaplan, Biomaterials 26, 5474 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. R.Z. Legeros, S. Lin, R. Rohanizadeh, D. Mijares, J.P. Legeros, J. Mat. Sci. Mat. Med. 14, 201 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Y.-L. Chang, C.M. Stanford, J.C. Keller, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 52, 270 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. G. Daculsi, O. Laboux, O. Malard, P. Weiss, J. Mat. Sci. Mat. Med. 14, 195 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Spanish Ministry of Education for funding this work through CICYT project MAT2002-00815.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalia Miño Fariña.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fariña, N.M., Guzón, F.M., Peña, M.L. et al. In vivo behaviour of two different biphasic ceramic implanted in mandibular bone of dogs. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 19, 1565–1573 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-008-3400-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-008-3400-y

Keywords

Navigation