Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimisation of the composition of an acrylic bone cement: application to relative amounts of the initiator and the activator/co-initiator in Surgical Simplex®P

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In cemented arthroplasties, the two-part self-curing acrylic bone cement is currently the only material used for anchoring the total joint replacement to the contiguous bone. In virtually all commercially available formulations of this cement, the agents used for the initiation and activation/co-initiation of the radical polymerisation reaction are benzoyl peroxide (BPO) and N, N dimethyl-para-toluidine (DMPT), respectively. There are no reports in the open literature on the rationale for the amounts of these and other constituents in the formulations of the cement. Given the concerns that have been raised in the literature regarding the effect of residual DMPT on the body, it is important to keep the starting amounts of BPO and DMPT as high and as low, respectively, as possible. In the present work, the focus is on the relative amounts of these two agents in the case of one widely used commercial formulation, Surgical Simplex® P. Thirty variants of this cement were formulated, covering three concentrations of the co-polymer/BPO (75%, 80%, and 85% of the mass of the powder) and DMPT amounts (ranging from 0.8 %v/v to 2.4% v/v.) The setting time (tset), the peak temperature reached during the cement polymerisation process (Tmax), and the ultimate compressive strength (UCS) of each of the formulations were determined in accordance with procedures specified in ISO 5833. A critical examination of all the results indicated that the optimum ratio of the concentration of the initiator (BPO embedded in the PMMA-sytrene co-polymer) to that of the activator/co-initiator (DMPT) in Surgical Simplex® P is 57.14 (80%w/w co-polymer + BPO per 1.4%v/v DMPT). The mean values of tset, Tmax, and UCS of this optimum formulation were determined to be 12.30 min, 68°C, and 101 MPa, respectively, all of which are within the limits specified in ISO 5833. The commercially available formulation of this cement contains 2.5%v/v DMPT, while the optimum formulation, as found in the present work, has 44% less DMPT, which may translate to a smaller amount of residual DMPT that is available for elution into the periprosthetic tissue in a cemented arthroplasty, over the in vivo life of the joint replacement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K-D KUHN, “Bone Cements: up to date comparison of physical and chemical properties of commercial materials” (Springer-Verlag, Germany, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. W. BILLMEYER, “Textbook of Polymer Science”, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. TANNINGHER, R. PASQUINI and S. BONATTI, Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 21/4 (1993) 349.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. VAZQUEZ, B. LEVENFELD and J. SAN ROMAN, Polym. Int. 46 (1998) 241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. L. POTTER, C. E. KRILL, D. NEAL and W. G. KOFRON, Ann. Emerg. Med. 17/10 (1988) 1098.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. BOESCH, H. HERMS and F. LINTNER, Arch. Toxicol. 51 (1982) 157.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. ISO 5833, Implants for surgery-Acrylic resin cements (2003).

  8. ASTM F 451-99a, Standard specification for acrylic bone cement (2004).

  9. B. PASCUAL, B. VAZQUEZ, M. GURRUCHAGA, I. GONI, M. P. GINEBRA, F. J. GIL, J. A. PLANELL, B. LEVENFELD and J. SAN ROMAN, Biomater. 17 (1996) 509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. B. VAZQUEZ, S. DEB and W. BONFIELD, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 8 (1997) 455.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. M. HASENWINKEL, E. P. LAUTENSCHLAGER, R. L. WIXSON and J. L. GILBERT, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 47 (1999) 36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. J. M. HASENWINKEL, E. P. LAUTENSCHLAGER, R. L. WIXSON and J. L. GILBERT, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 59 (1999) 411.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. MILNER, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater. 68B (2004) 180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. R. Towler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Madigan, S., Towler, M.R. & Lewis, G. Optimisation of the composition of an acrylic bone cement: application to relative amounts of the initiator and the activator/co-initiator in Surgical Simplex®P. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 17, 307–311 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-8227-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-8227-9

Keywords

Navigation