Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) microspheres/liquid poly(dimethylsiloxane) composition for correction of small defects in face: Histological evaluation in animal experiment

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two kinds of composition based on commercial liquid poly(dimethylsiloxane) and laboratory-made poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) microspheres of different size fractions (30–40 or 125–180 μ m) were prepared. Tissue reaction on injection of the compositions, optimum microsphere size and morphology were investigated in the experiments on rats. The microspheres induced foreign body reaction characterized by an increased content of fibroblasts and mild infiltration of injection field by inflammatory cells. The 125–180 μ m microspheres seemed to be well covered with poly(dimethylsiloxane) and more uniformly distributed in the tissue than the 30–40 μ m ones. As a result, the extent of foreign body reaction induced by the former microspheres was somewhat lower than that induced by the latter. Moreover, time-dependent degradation of 30–40 μ m PHEMA microspheres was more pronounced than that of 125–180 μ m ones, which can affect duration of the aesthetic effect after prospective facioplasty. Results of histological investigations demonstrate a good prospect of the proposed composition for contour and bulk facioplasty of small soft tissue defects and skin wrinkles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. A. ELLIS, A. S. MAKDESSIAN and D. J. BROWN, Facial Plast. Surg. Clin. North Am. 9 (2001) 405.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. L. A. BRUSOVA and N. I. OSTRECOVA, Ann. Plast. Reconstruct. Aesthetic Surg. 2 (2001) 52.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. MC CLELLAND, B. EGBERT, V. HANKO, R. A. BERG and F. DE LUSTRO, Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 100 (1997) 1466.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. I. NEROBEEV, G. I. OSOPIV, V. I. MALACHOVSKAYA and A. L. ISCHENKO, An. Plast. Reconstruct. Aesthetic Surg. 2 (1997) 22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. OLENIUS, Aesthetic Plast Surg. 22 (1998) 97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. I. PITANGUY, P. MULLER, N. PICCOLO and L. FREITAS, Compendium 8 (1987) 460.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. T. CHENG, S. W. PERKINS and M. M. HAMILTON, Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am. 35 (2002) 73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. PIACQUADIO, M. JARCHO and R. GOLTZ, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 36 (1997) 544.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. G. LEMPERLE, J. J. ROMANO and M. BUSSO, Dermatol. Surg. 29 (2003) 573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. BERGERET-GALLEY, X. LATOUCHE and Y. G. ILLOUZ, Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 25 (2001) 249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. F. L. ASHLEY, S. BRALEY, T. D. REES, D. GOULIAN and D. L. BALLANTYNE Jr., Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 39 (1967) 411.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. T. D. REES, D. L. BALLANTYNE Jr., I. SEIDMAN and G. A. HAWTHORNE, Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 39 (1967) 402.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. T. EDGERTON, Clin. Plast. Surg.4 (1947) 311.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. A. ADAMYAN, N. I. OSTRECOVA, T. M. CZUDINOVA, R. C. MAGOMADOV and K. O. SULTANOVA, Ann. Plast. Reconstruct. Aesthetic Surg. 2 (1997) 41.

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. J. SERGOTT, J. P. LIMOLI, C. M BALDWIN Jr. and D. R. LAUB, Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 78 (1986) 104.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. R. SHAFIR, A. AMIR and E. GUR, Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 106 (2000) 1215.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. N. A. PEPPAS (ed.) Hydrogels in Medicine and Pharmacy (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1987) Vol. III.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. HORÁK, M. ČERVINKA and V. PŮŽA, Biomaterials 18 (1997) 1355.

    Google Scholar 

  19. O. A. GOLUBEVA, HEMASIL—A new composite injection material for correction of small defects in face (in Russian), PhD. Thesis, Vishnevskii Institute of Surgery, Moscow 2003.

  20. J. ČOUPEK, M. KŘIVÁKOVÁ and S. POKORNÝ, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Symp. 42 (1973) 185.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. HORÁK, F. LEDNICKÝ, V. ŘEHÁK and F. ŠVEC, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 49 (1993) 2041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. D. HORÁK, F. ŠVEC, J. KÁLAL, K. Z. GUMARGALIEVA, A. A. ADAMYAN, N. D. SKUBA, M. I. TITOVA and N. V. TROSTENYUK, Biomaterials 7 (1986) 188.

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. F. MUELLER, S. J. HEIBER and W. L. PLANKL, Process for preparing hydrogels as spherical beads of large size, US Patent 4, 224, 427 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  24. O. A. GOLUBEVA and A. V. NIKOLAEVA-FEDOROVA, Vestnik Ross. Gosudarstv. Mosk. Univ. 28 (2003) 44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Horák.

Additional information

Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horák, D., Adamyan, A., Golubeva, O. et al. Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) microspheres/liquid poly(dimethylsiloxane) composition for correction of small defects in face: Histological evaluation in animal experiment. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 17, 123–129 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-6815-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-6815-3

Keywords

Navigation