Abstract
Surface texturing is one of the key steps in the manufacturing process of mono-crystalline silicon solar cells. The mainstream texturing process applied currently is based on alkaline texturing that produces upright pyramids (UPs)-structured surface, while the inverted pyramids (IPs) structure has also received growing interest due to the lower reflectance. Here, we examine the influence of these two different structures on the surface reflectance, phosphorus (P) diffusion profile, surface passivation performance and quantum efficiency of the solar cells. The results show that the IPs structure is advantageous over UPs structure in front side reflectance, P captured ability, back side passivation effect after polishing, and silver-silicon contact resistivity. However, its poor surface passivation performance on the front side limits the efficiency of the as-fabricated solar cells as compared with the UPs-structured wafers. Therefore, improving the front side surface passivation of the wafers textured with IPs structure could be a key factor that determines the feasibility of commercialization of the related texturing technology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data of current findings will be made available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
S. Kashyap, J. Madan, R. Pandey, Sustain. Energy Fuels 13, 3249–3262 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2se00434h
C. Liu, J. Xu, Z. Zhang, Z. Liu, X. Yuan, H. Li, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 32, 23465–23471 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-06834-1
H. Liu, L. Zhao, H. Diao, W. Wang, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 101, 149–155 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2019.06.003
P. Zhang, H. Sun, K. Tao, R. Jia, G. Su, X. Dai, Z. Jin, X. Liu, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 30, 8667–8675 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-019-01189-0
K. Chen, J. Zha, F. Hu, X. Ye, S. Zou, V. Vähänissi, J.M. Pearce, H. Savin, X. Su, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 191, 1–8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2018.10.015
U. Gangopadhyay, K.H. Kim, S.K. Dhungel, U. Manna, P.K. Basu, M. Banerjee, H. Saha, J. Yi, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 90, 3557–3567 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2006.06.044
J. Yoo, K.M. Han, J.S. Cho, Vacuum 128, 118–122 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2016.03.023
M. Ju, K. Mallem, S. Dutta, N. Balaji, D. Oh, E.C. Cho, Y.H. Cho, Y. Kim, J. Yi, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process 85, 68–75 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2018.05.039
J. Wu, Y. Liu, W. Chen, Y. Zhao, Q. Chen, H. Tang, Y. Wang, X. Du, Appl. Surf. Sci. 506, 144778 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144778
J. Zhao, A. Wang, M.A. Green, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 32, 89–94 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0248(94)90258-5
J. Zhao, A. Wang, P. Altermatt, M.A. Green, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 3636 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.114124
J. Zhao, A. Wang, M.A. Green, Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 7, 471–474 (1999)
Q. Wang, P. Yao, Y. Li, L. Jiang, J. Xu, S. Liang, D. Chun, W. He, C. Huang, H. Zhu, H. Liu, Opt. Laser Technol. 157, 108647 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108647
B. Yang, M. Lee, Microelectron. Eng. 130, 52–56 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2014.09.016
S. Sivasubramaniam, M.M. Alkaisi, Microelectron. Eng. 119, 146–150 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2014.04.004
B. Quan, Z. Yao, W. Sun, Z. Liu, X. Xia, C. Gu, J. Li, Microelectron. Eng. 163, 110–114 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2016.06.016
Y. Zhao, Y. Liu, W. Chen, J. Wu, Q. Chen, H. Tang, Y. Wang, X. Du, Sol. Energy 201, 461–468 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.03.013
W. Chen, Y. Liu, L. Yang, J. Wu, Q. Chen, Y. Zhao, Y. Wang, X. Du, Sci. Rep. 8, 2–9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21877-x
K. Kumar, K.K.C. Lee, P.R. Herman, J. Nogami, N.P. Kherani, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 222106 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4768689
H.P. Wang, A.C. Li, T.Y. Lin, J.H. He, Nano Energy 23, 1–6 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.034
B. Yang, M. Lee, Opt. Laser Technol. 63, 120–124 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2014.04.009
Y. Wang, L. Yang, Y. Liu, Z. Mei, W. Chen, J. Li, H. Liang, A. Kuznetsov, X. Du, Sci. Rep. 5, 1–6 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10843
L. Yang, Y. Liu, Y. Wang, W. Chen, Q. Chen, J. Wu, A. Kuznetsov, X. Du, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 166, 121–126 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2017.03.017
W. Chen, Y. Liu, J. Wu, Q. Chen, Y. Zhao, Y. Wang, X. Du, A.C.S. Appl, Mater. Interfaces 11, 10052–10058 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b00724
K. Gao, Y. Liu, Y. Fan, L. Shi, Y. Zhuang, Y. Cui, S. Yuan, Y. Wan, W. Shen, Z. Huang, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 15, 174 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-020-03404-y
K. Gao, Y. Liu, H. Cheng, S. Zhong, R. Tong, X. Kong, X. Song, Z. Huang, ACS Omega 6, 32925–32929 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c04972
Z.G. Huang, K. Gao, X.G. Wang, C. Xu, X.M. Song, L.X. Shi, Y. Zhang, B. Hoex, W.Z. Shen, Sol. Energy 188, 300–304 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.06.015
S.D. Wang, S.Y. Chen, S.P. Hsu, C.Y. Liao, W.Y. Hsu, Appl. Surf. Sci. 578, 152050 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.152050
D. Zhang, L. Wang, R. Jia, K. Tao, S. Jiang, H. Ge, B. Wang, Z. Gao, X. Li, M. Li, Z. Jin, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 138, 106281 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2021.106281
D. Zhang, S. Jiang, K. Tao, R. Jia, H. Ge, X. Li, B. Wang, M. Li, Z. Ji, Z. Gao, Z. Jin, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 230, 111200 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2021.111200
P. Wang, S. Xiao, R. Jia, H. Sun, X. Dai, G. Su, K. Tao, Sol. Energy 169, 153–158 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.04.049
D. Suh, Curr. Appl. Phys. 18, 178–182 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2017.11.024
R. Tong, W. Zhang, X. Ke, D. Liu, Z. Zhang, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process 126, 105662 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2021.105662
M. Cui, C. Jin, Y. Yang, X. Wu, L. Zhuge, Optik 127, 11230–11234 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.08.120
A. Safiei, H. Windgassen, K. Wolter, H. Kurz, Energy Procedia 27, 432–437 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.089
X. Dai, R. Jia, G. Su, H. Sun, K. Tao, C. Zhang, P. Zhang, Z. Jin, X. Liu, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 186, 42–49 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2018.06.011
S.W. Glunz, F. Feldmann, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 185, 260–269 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2018.04.029
S.H. Lee, M.F. Bhopal, D.W. Lee, S.H. Lee, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 79, 66–73 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2018.01.019
H.B. Tang, S. Ma, Y. Lv, Z.P. Li, W.Z. Shen, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 216, 110712 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2020.110712
M. Li, N. Iqbal, Z. Yang, X. Lin, N.K. Pannaci, C. Avalos, T. Shaw, T. Jurca, K. Davis, IEEE. J. Photovolt. 10, 1277–1282 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3003792
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Anhui Province of China (No. 2022l07020011).
Funding
Anhui Provincial Key Research and Development Plan, 2022l07020011, Dongming Liu
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RT contributed to the conception, investigation, data curation and writing. CL involved in the data analysis and revision. SM and SZ contributed to the sample preparation, data acquisition and analysis. XL involved in the methodology and revision. DL supervised the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tong, R., Li, C., Ma, S. et al. Upright pyramids vs. inverted pyramids surface textures: a comparative investigation on the electrical properties of PERC solar cells. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 34, 54 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022-09567-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022-09567-x