Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding the relationship between frontier orbital level offsets to optoelectronic and electronic properties of doped P3HT-based composites

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the greatest advantages of organic/polymeric semiconductors is their ease of tunability of optoelectronic, electronic, and optical properties pre- and post-synthesis. Chemical doping has numerous advantages in comparison to the other routes due to being quick, cost-effective, and highly controllable. For dopants to ionize the host material, the frontier orbital offset should be carefully engineered to enable efficient charge transfer between dopant and host material. This work directly studies different frontier orbital levels between poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) (P3HT) and a variety of molecular dopants. Results show that the electrical conductivity decreases as the LUMO of the dopant increases; this could be explained by the increased energy barrier for electron transfer from the HOMO of the P3HT to the LUMO of the dopant acceptors. Among the several dopants investigated, this study reveals that the Seebeck coefficients decrease as the frontier orbital offsets (between P3HT HOMO and acceptor LUMO) decrease and the electrical conductivity increases. Optimal offsets are also identified where certain parameters exhibit the highest or lowest values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data that were generated and/or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

References

  1. S.-S. Sun, L.R. Dalton, Introduction to Organic Electronic and Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, 2nd edn. (CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Li, J. Hou, “Major Classes of Conjugated Polymers and Synthetic Strategies”, in Introduction to Organic Electronic and Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, 2nd edn. (CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, 2017), pp.190–194

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.K. Chiang, C.R. Fincher, Y.W. Park, A.J. Heeger, H. Shirakawa, E.J. Louis, S.C. Gau, A.G. MacDiarmid, Electrical conductivity in doped polyacetylene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 39(17), 1098–1101 (1977)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. S.-S. Sun, N. Sariciftci, Organic Photovoltaics: Mechanisms, Materials, and Devices (CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. S.-S. Sun, Basic Electronic Structures and Charge Carrier Generation in Organic Optoelectronic Materials in Introduction to Organic Electronic and Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, 2nd edn. (CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, 2017), pp.77–87

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Pei, H. Wang, G.J. Snyder, Band engineering of thermoelectric materials (adv. mater. 46/2012). Adv. Mater. 24(46), 6124–6124 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Méndez, G. Heimel, S. Winkler, J. Frisch, A. Opitz, K. Sauer, B. Wegner, M. Oehzelt, C. Röthel, S. Duhm, D. Többens, N. Koch, I. Salzmann, Charge-transfer crystallites as molecular electrical dopants. Nat. Commun. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Komarudin, A. Morita, K. Osakada, T. Yamamoto, Iodine doping of poly(thiophene-2,5-diyl) and poly(3-alkylthiophene-2,5-diyl)s in aqueous media. Polym. J. 30(10), 860–862 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. P. Tian, L. Tang, J. Xiang, Z. Sun, R. Ji, S.K. Lai, S.P. Lau, J. Kong, J. Zhao, C. Yang, Y. Li, Solution processable high-performance infrared organic photodetector by iodine doping. RSC Adv. 6(51), 45166–45171 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Gao, B.W. Stein, A.K. Thomas, J.A. Garcia, J. Yang, M.L. Kirk, J.K. Grey, Enhanced charge transfer doping efficiency in J-aggregate poly(3-hexylthiophene) nanofibers. J.Phys. Chem. C 119(28), 16396–16402 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. E. Lim, K.A. Peterson, G.M. Su, M.L. Chabinyc, Thermoelectric properties of poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) doped with 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane (F4TCNQ) by vapor-phase infiltration. Chem. Mater. 30(3), 998–1010 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Lee III., S.-S. Sun, Properties and mechanisms of iodine doped of P3HT and P3HT/PCBM composites. AIMS Mater. Sci. 5(3), 479–493 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2018.3.479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Lüssem, M. Riede, K. Leo, “Doping of Organic Semiconductors”, Physics of Organic Semiconductors (Wiley, Hoboken, 2013), pp.425–496

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Li, Polymer Self-Organization Enhances Photovoltaic Efficiency (SPIE Newsroom, Bellingham, 2006), pp.3–5

    Google Scholar 

  15. H.-C. Liao, C.-P. Hsu, M.-C. Wu, C.-F. Lu, W.-F. Su, Conjugated polymer/nanoparticles nanocomposites for high efficient and real-time volatile organic compounds sensors. Anal. Chem. 85(19), 9305–9311 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Baghgar, M.D. Barnes, Work function modification in p3ht h/j aggregate nanostructures revealed by kelvin probe force microscopy and photoluminescence imaging. ACS Nano 9(7), 7105–7112 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. P.J. Brown, D.S. Thomas, A. Köhler, J.S. Wilson, J.-S. Kim, C.M. Ramsdale, H. Sirringhaus, R.H. Friend, Effect of interchain interactions on the absorption and emission of poly(3-hexylthiophene). Phys. Rev. B 67(6), 064203 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. B. Endrődi, J. Mellár, Z. Gingl, C. Visy, C. Janáky, Molecular and supramolecular parameters dictating the thermoelectric performance of conducting polymers: a case study using poly(3-alkylthiophene)s. J Phys. Chem. C 119(16), 8472–8479 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Ehrenreich, S.T. Birkhold, E. Zimmermann, H. Hu, K.-D. Kim, J. Weickert, T. Pfadler, L. Schmidt-Mende, H-aggregate analysis of P3HT thin films-capability and limitation of photoluminescence and UV/Vis spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 6(1), 1–8 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Gao, J.D. Roehling, Y. Li, H. Guo, A.J. Moulé, J.K. Grey, The effect of 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane charge transfer dopants on the conformation and aggregation of poly(3-hexylthiophene). J. Mater. Chem. C 1(36), 5638 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Clark, J.-F. Chang, F.C. Spano, R.H. Friend, C. Silva, Determining exciton bandwidth and film microstructure in polythiophene films using linear absorption spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(16), 163306 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. K. Tashiro, M. Kobayashi, T. Kawai, K. Yoshino, Crystal structural change in poly(3-alkyl thiophene)s induced by iodine doping as studied by an organized combination of X-ray diffraction, infrared/Raman spectroscopy and computer simulation techniques. Polymer 38(12), 2867–2879 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. I. Salzmann, G. Heimel, M. Oehzelt, S. Winkler, N. Koch, Molecular electrical doping of organic semiconductors: fundamental mechanisms and emerging dopant design rules. Acc. Chem. Res. 49(3), 370–378 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This material is based upon work supported, in parts, by grant awards from the United States National Science Foundation (NSF Award # HRD-1547771). Sandia National Laboratories is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International Inc., for the US Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA0003525.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors contributed to the conception, experiment, design, and analysis. Material preparation and data collection was performed by HOL. Analysis was performed by HOL, LJT, and SSS. The first draft of the manuscript was written by HOL, and all the authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sam-Shajing Sun.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 12117 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, H.O., Treadwell, L.J. & Sun, SS. Understanding the relationship between frontier orbital level offsets to optoelectronic and electronic properties of doped P3HT-based composites. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 33, 24276–24284 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022-09148-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022-09148-y

Navigation