Advertisement

Surface trap effects on flashover voltages of epoxy/Al2O3 nanocomposites for high voltage insulation

  • Shihu YuEmail author
  • Shihang Wang
  • M. Tariq Nazir
  • Weiwang Wang
  • Shengtao Li
  • Toan Phung
  • Tatsuo Takada
Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, surface trap distribution and the affected surface charge transport properties in epoxy/Al2O3 nanocomposites were studied to provide theoretical and experimental basis for improving surface flashover performance in vacuum. Four different contents of nano-Al2O3 particles were doped into epoxy and different trap distribution of samples was calculated from the surface potential decay method. Surface charge injection was identified by a direct current integrated charge [DCIC-Q(t)] method. Secondary electron emission (SEE) coefficient were obtained combing testing and fitting method. Results showed improved charge injection resistance, reduced charge mobility and SEE coefficient at a slight concentration of 0.5 wt% and 1 wt% by introducing deep traps. Continuing to increase nanoparticles in matrix was proved to reduce trap depth and have adverse effects. The surface flashover voltages reached the highest at 1 wt% nano-doping, which was in accordance with the percolate threshold loading content for trap depth, charge injection field and SEE coefficient. Surface charge injection caused the local field enhancement at the counter electrode and increased the possibility of surface flashover. Deep traps over 1 eV contributed to carrier capture, reduced charge injection and had a positive effect on increasing surface flashover voltage.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant Nos. 2017YFB0902700, 2017YFB0902702) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Project with No. 51907147.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding authors state that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    M.T. Nazir, B.T. Phung, Yu. Shihu, Shengtao Li, Resistance against AC corona discharge of micro-ATH/nano-Al2O3 co-filled silicone rubber composites. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 25, 657–667 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.T. Nazir, B.T. Phung, S. Li, S. Yu, Comparative AC tracking and erosion resistance of micro-A1 N and BN filled silicone rubber composites, in IEEE Int’l Conference on Electrical Materials and Power Equipment (ICEMPE), (2017), p. 603–606Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.T. Nazir, B.T. Phung, S. Yu et al., Thermal distribution analysis and suppression mechanism of carbonized tracking and erosion in silicone rubber/SiO2 nanocomposites. Polym. Test. 70, 226–233 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.T. Nazir, B.T. Phung, A. Sahoo, S. Yu, Y. Zhang, S. Li, Surface discharge behaviours, dielectric and mechanical properties of EPDM based nanocomposites containing nano-BN. Appl. Nanosci. (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-019-00986-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    X. Jiang, L. Chen, Z. Zhang, C. Sun, L. Shu, M.T. Nazir, Effect of arc-levitating from polluted insulators’ surface in the low air pressure on its DC flashover performance. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 5, 729–734 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Tariq Nazir, X. Jiang, S. Akram, Laboratory investigation on hydrophobicity of new silicon rubber insulator under different environmental conditions. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Sci. 12, 1–8 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Zhan, H. Mu, G. Zhang, X. Huang, X. Shao, J. Deng, Cathode-like luminescence from vacuum-dielectric interface induced by self-stabilizing secondary electron emission. Appl. Phys. Lett. DOI 10(1063/1), 4738999 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H.C. Miller, Surface flashover of insulators. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 24, 765–786 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Li, J. Hu, C. Lin, J. He, The potentially neglected culprit of DC surface flashover: electron migration under temperature gradients. Sci. Rep. 7, 3271 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Zhijie, F. Jianbin, L. Jinzhong et al., DC flashover characteristics of epoxy resin insulator with and without fillers under different SF6 gas pressures. Power Syst. Technol. 34, 155–159 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.S. Rajan, K. Dwarakanath, N. Srinivasan, Surface flashover strength of different insulating materials in N2-SF6 gas mixtures under combined AC/DC voltages. in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Electrical Insulating Materials, (2001), p. 262–265Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Y. Huang, D. Min, S. Li, Z. Li, D. Xie, X. Wang, S. Lin, Surface flashover performance of epoxy resin microcomposites improved by electron beam irradiation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 406, 39–45 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Tanaka, Dielectric nanocomposites with insulating properties. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 12, 914–928 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M.F. Fréchette, C.W. Reed, H. Sedding, Progress, understanding and challenges in the field of nanodielectrics. IEEJ Trans. Fundam. Mater. 126, 1031–1043 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Takada, T. Fujitomi, T. Mori, T. Iwata, T. Ono, H. Miyake, Y. Tanaka, New diagnostic method of electrical insulation properties based on current integration. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 24, 2549–2558 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y. Sekiguchi, M. Fukuma, Electrical charges and currents distribution analysis in plaque samples by the DCIC-Q(t) method, in Int’l Symposium on Electrical Insulating Materials (ISEIM), (2017), p. 609–612Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. Takada, Acoustic and optical methods for measuring electric charge distributions in dielectrics. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 6, 519–547 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Fabiani, G.C. Montanari, L.A. Dissado, Measuring a possible HVDC insulation killer: fast charge pulses. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 22, 45–51 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    W. Wang, K. Sonoda, S. Yoshida, T. Takada, Y. Tanaka, T. Kurihara, Current integrated technique for insulation diagnosis of water-tree degraded cable. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 5, 94–101 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Bahari, M. Babaeipour, B. Soltani, Theoretical investigation of quantum tunneling and self-energy phenomena in Al2O3/PVP nanocomposite. J. Mater. Sci. 27, 2131–2137 (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Salavati-Niasari, F. Farzaneh, M. Ghandi, Oxidation of cyclohexene with tert -butylhydroperoxide and hydrogen peroxide catalyzed by alumina-supported manganese(II) complexes. J. Mol. Catal. A 186, 101–107 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. Yu, S. Li, The relationship between surface flashover properties and trap characteristics of nanocomposites, in Int’l Conference on Condition Monitoring and Diagnosis (CMD), (2016), p. 960–963Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    W. Shen, H. Mu, G. Zhang, J. Deng, D. Tu, Identification of electron and hole trap based on isothermal surface potential decay model. J. Appl. Phys. (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4792491 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. Li, F. Zhou, D. Min, S. Li, The energy distribution of trapped charges in polymers based on isothermal surface potential decay model. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 22, 1723–1732 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    D. Min, C. Yan, Y. Huang, S. Li, Y. Ohki, Dielectric and carrier transport properties of silicone rubber degraded by gamma irradiation. Polymers 9, 533 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9100533 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Y. Sekiguchi, T. Takada, H. Miyake, T. Yasuhiro, A study on electric charge behaviors in polymeric materials using direct current integrated charge method, in Int’l Symposium on Electrical Insulating Materials, (2017), p. 691–694Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. Yu, S. Li, Surface flashover characteristics of EP/Al2O3 nanocomposites in different atmosphere, in IEEE Int’l Conference on Dielectrics (ICD), (2016), p. 120–123Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Li, G. Yin, S. Bai, J. Li, A new potential barrier model in epoxy resin nanodielectrics. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 18, 1535–1543 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    B. Du, J. Li, H. Du, Effects of fluorination on surface charge accumulation and decay of polyimide film. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 599–602 (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    D. Montarnal, F. Tournilhac, M. Hidalgo, L. Leibler, Epoxy based networks combining chemical and supramolecular hydrogen-bonding crosslinks. J. Polym. Sci. A 48, 1133–1141 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    H. Sjostedt, S.M. Gubanski, Y.V. Serdyuk, Charging characteristics of EPDM and silicone rubbers deduced from surface potential measurements. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 16, 696–703 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    S. Wang, P. Chen, H. Li, J. Li, Z. Chen, Improved DC performance of crosslinked polyethylene insulation depending on a higher purity. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 24, 1809–1817 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Y. Yang, J. He, G. Wu, J. Hu, Thermal Stabilization Effect” of Al2O3 nano-dopants improves the high-temperature dielectric performance of polyimide. Sci. Rep. 5, 16986 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16986 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    J. Zha, H. Song, Z. Dang, C. Shi, J. Bai, Mechanism analysis of improved corona-resistant characteristic in polyimide/TiO2 nanohybrid films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 192911 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3025408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    O. Hachenberg, W. Brauer, Secondary electron emission from solids. Adv. Electron. Electron Phys. 11, 413–499 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Y. Novikov, A.V. Rakov, S.V. Sedov, A.N. Simonov, I. Yu Stekolin, I.B. Strizhkov, Secondary electron emission from a relief surface: effect of a relief depth. Phys. Chem. Mech. Surf. 10, 679–685 (1995)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    J. Cazaux, A new model of dependence of secondary electron emission yield on primary electron energy for application to polymers. J. Appl. Phys. 38, 2433 (2005)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    J. Li, B. Du, Y. Xing, J. Jin, Trap distribution and flashover characteristics of carbon-black-filled EPDM in low temperature. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 26, 1–5 (2016)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    S. Yu, S. Li, S. Wang, Y. Huang, M.T. Nazir, B.T. Phung, Surface flashover properties of epoxy based nanocomposites containing functionalized nano-TiO2. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 25, 1567–1576 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    G. Zhang, W. Zhao, Z. Yan, Y. Liu, Optical investigation of AC preflashover of alumina ceramic in vacuum. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 11, 498–505 (2004)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    O. Yamamoto, T. Hara, T. Nakae, M. Hayashi, I. Ueon, Effects of spark conditioning, insulator angle and length on surface flashover in vacuum. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 24, 991–994 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Electric Power Research Institute of Guangdong Power Grid Co. Ltd.GuangzhouChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power EquipmentXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  3. 3.School of Mechanical and Manufacturing EngineeringUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  4. 4.School of Electrical Engineering and TelecommunicationsUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  5. 5.Tokyo City UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations