Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Room-temperature ITO electrodes evaluated for organic solar cells using a photonic flux density figure of merit

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance of ITO films grown by RF sputtering as a transparent conductive oxide (TCO) was evaluated using a photonic flux density figure of merit. This figure of merit provides additional information compared to other figures of merit, since it includes in its analysis the performance along the electromagnetic spectrum comprehended between the TCO bandgap energy and the absorber bandgap energy. The ITO thin films were grown by 200 W power RF sputtering without any substrate heating or post annealing treatment varying the Ar pressure. Instead of heating, the relatively high RF power provided the energy needed to enhance the diffusion process of the sputtered species in the substrate, thus improving crystallinity. Transmittances greater than 85% were obtained in the visible region of the spectrum independently of the argon pressure used. Regarding the electrical resistivity, an average value of 10−3 Ω cm was obtained at 300 K. Photocurrent losses were calculated in order to compare the grown ITO films performance with an ideal one. The photonic flux density figure of merit obtained in this work suggests that the overall performance is sufficient to be implemented as TCOs in many applications; moreover, the lack of substrate heating or post-annealing treatment makes these films good candidates to be used as TCOs in heat sensitive devices such as P3HT:PCBM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Terzini, P. Thilakan, C. Minarini, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 77, 110 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. K.N. Rao, S. Kashyap, Surf. Rev. Lett. 13, 221 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M.K. Fung, K.K. Wong, X.Y. Chen, Y.F. Chan, A.M.C. Ng, A.B. Djurišić, W.K. Chan, Curr. Appl. Phys. 12, 697 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S.S. Yap, T.K. Yong, C.H. Nee, T.Y. Tou, Appl. Laser Ablation-Thin Film Depos. Nanomater. Synth. Surf. Modif. (InTech, 2016)

  5. A.H. Al-hamdani, J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 4, 346 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. T.M. Hammad, Phys. Status Solidi 206, 2128 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Haacke, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 4086 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J.A. Mendez-Gamboa, R. Castro-Rodriguez, I.V. Perez-Quintana, R.A. Medina-Esquivel, and A. Martel-Arbelo, Thin Solid Films 599, 14 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. O. Tuna, Y. Selamet, G. Aygun, L. Ozyuzer, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 43, 55402 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Koseoglu, F. Turkoglu, M. Kurt, M.D. Yaman, F.G. Akca, G. Aygun, L. Ozyuzer, Vacuum 120, 8 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. N.M. Khusayfan, M.M. El-Nahass, Adv. Condens. Matter Phys. (2013). (2013)

  12. S.V.N. Pammi, H.-J. Jung, S.-G. Yoon, IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 10, 1059 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Powder Diffraction File, Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards, (ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1967) Card 060416

  14. A.M. Gheidari, F. Behafarid, G. Kavei, M. Kazemzad, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 136, 37 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H.-N. Cui, V. Teixeira, L.-J. Meng, R. Martins, E. Fortunato, Vacuum 82, 1507 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G.H. Chandra, J.P. De la Cruz, J. Ventura, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 26, 75017 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Raoufi, F. Hosseinpanahi, J. Mod. Phys. 3, 645 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Tauc, Amorph. Liq. Semicond. (Springer, 1974), pp. 159–220

  19. L. Álvarez-Fraga, F. Jiménez-Villacorta, J. Sánchez-Marcos, A. de Andrés, C. Prieto, Appl. Surf. Sci. 344, 217 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. L.J.A. Koster, V.D. Mihailetchi, P.W.M. Blom, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 93511 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. H.H. Yudar, Ş Korkmaz, S. Özen, V. Şenay, S. Pat, Appl. Phys. A 122, 748 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M.H. Ahn, E.S. Cho, S.J. Kwon, Vacuum 101, 221 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support by Conacyt Postgraduate Scholarship. The authors also thank Patricia Quintana for the access to LANNBIO, Daniel Aguilar Treviño for his technical assistance in X-ray diffraction measurements, and M.C. Willian Cauich for his technical assistance in film thicknesses measurements. This work has been supported by CONACYT-SENER under contract 254667.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Acosta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reyes, D.C., Mendez-Gamboa, J.A., Vidal, M.R. et al. Room-temperature ITO electrodes evaluated for organic solar cells using a photonic flux density figure of merit. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 29, 11059–11064 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-9188-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-9188-8

Navigation