Visible photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue on magnetic semiconducting La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19


Methylene blue (MB) is a representative of a class of dyestuffs resistant to biodegradation. This paper presents a novel photocatalytic degradation of MB by La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 compound, which is a traditional permanent magnet and displays a large magnetic hysteresis (M–H) loop. The remnant magnetic moment and coercive field are determined to be 52 emu/g and 5876 Oe, respectively. UV–Visible optical spectroscopy reveals that La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 is simultaneously a semiconductor, whose direct and indirect band gap energies are determined to be 1.47 and 0.88 eV, respectively. The near infrared band gap makes it a good candidate to harvest sunlight for photocatalytic reaction or solar cell devices. This magnetic compound demonstrates excellent photocatalytic activity on degradation of MB under visible illumination. The colour of MB dispersion solution changes from deep blue to pale white and the absorbance decreases rapidly from 1.8 down to zero when the illumination duration extends to 6 h. Five absorption bands did not make any blue shifts along with the reaction time, suggesting a one-stepwise degradation process of MB, which makes La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 a unique magnetic catalyst and differs from TiO2 and other conventional catalysts.


As far back as Neolithic man first utilised a bit of suspended lodestone to explore, humankind has utilised attractive materials of different sorts. In any case, it was not until the approach of electricity that the magnetic processes started to be caught attraction. It is presently realised that lodestone is an iron mineral, magnetite, which is one of an extensive variety of magnetic ceramics, iron(III) oxide, called the ferrites having a cubic crystal structure. The ferrites or hard ferrites are also termed as oxide magnets have replaced older metal alloy permanent magnets and also its cost-effectiveness, lower weight and higher coercivity presented these materials as applications in dc motors electrical relays and ore separators [1].

Lots of research recently has been carried out on metal oxide and metal ferrite nanoparticles prepared using green synthesis’ methods showing good photocatalytic activity. Some of the ferrites were prepared using tragacanth gum as the precursors such as Ni–Zn–Cu ferrite [2], Cu ferrite [3], Ni–Cu–Mg ferrite [4] and Mg ferrites [5]. Metal oxide nanoparticles such as NiO [6], ZnO [7], MgFe2O4–γ-Al2O3 [8], ZnO–CuO [9] and Ag/ZnO bimetallic alloy [10]. are also produced using natural gums and dyes such as Arabic gum, tragacanth gel, ferulago angulata and oak fruit hull.

The other group of ferrites, which have hexagonal structure, are known as hexaferrite. Hexaferrites are massively used in the commercial and technological application, such that Ba-hexaferrite provides 50% of magnetic materials with production is over 300,000 tonnes per year. Since the discovery, it is noticed that there has been an exponential increase in the degree of interest, due to general magnetic properties, microwave properties, data storage and magnetic recording materials [11].

There are various processes which were used to prepare hexaferrite such as calcination and sintering in high temperatures [12]. But this process produces coarser particulate sizes and is not economically viable. Some other processes such as co-precipitation [13], spray-drying and microemulsion [14], hydrothermal [15], sol–gel [16, 17] and conventional route [18, 19].

Due to uniaxial magnetoplumbite structure with strontium divalent metallic ion, good magnetic properties, excellent tribological characteristics, weak temperature dependent coercivity and better chemical stability make SrFe12O19 a special material amongst hexagonal ferrites [20, 21]. Various studies have been carried out in order to enhance the magnetic properties using substitutions on Fe3+ or Sr2+ ions or both with La–Co, La3+, La–Zn, Cr3+, and La–Co [22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Amongst all the substitution, La addition is the most experimented upon strontium hexaferrite, whose magnetic performance was greatly enhanced [29]. Until now, the magnetic semiconducting characteristics have been tested upon several M-type hexaferrite, including PbFe12−xO19−δ [30] and Gd–Co doped barium hexaferrite [31].

But to the best of our knowledge, very few optical characterization studies have been carried out on La substituted on strontium hexaferrite. The photocatalytic performance of La substituted strontium hexaferrite upon its semiconducting feature has never been reported till to date. Titanium dioxide is the most widely used catalyst for pollutant degradation of photocatalytic process [32,33,34,35]. The band gap energy of TiO2 is pretty large and it requires ultraviolet (UV) light to generate electrons for photocatalytic reaction. UV light makes up only a small fraction (< 4%) of the total solar spectrum reaching the surface of the earth [32]. Therefore, seeking oxide semiconductors with band gap energies within visible light region to harvest most fraction of the visible sunlight would be a milestone for organic pollutant degradation through photocatalytic degradation process. La modified SrFe12O19 matches such requirements. The direct band gap energy locates at near-infrared region, which makes it be able to harvest major sunlight of the solar spectrum. This compound contains only low toxic and abundance elements and thus is environment-friendly. The present study deals with the synthesis of La0.2Sr0.8Fe12O19 by a polymer precursor method. The semiconductor characterization of La0.2Sr0.8Fe12O19 has been checked out by a UV–Visible-near infrared optical spectrometer, its excellent magnetic properties and photocatalytic role upon degradation process of methylene blue (MB) over the visible-light illumination have been investigated in detail.

Experimental procedure

The preparation of La–SrFe12O19 has been carried out using polymer precursor procedure, where strontium acetate (Sr(CH3COO)2·3H2O), Lanthanum acetate (La(CH3COO)2·3H2O) and ferric acetylacetonate (C15H21FeO6) were used (Alfa Aesar). At first stoichiometric compositions of strontium acetate and lanthanum acetate were dissolved in 15 ml glycerine and a clear solution is prepared. In order to remove the trapped water, the solution was distilled using a rotary evaporator at 120 °C. The distilled solution was transferred to the glove box in a 50 ml flask. A stoichiometric amount of ferric acetylacetonate was dissolved in a solvent mixture containing 70 ml acetone and 100 ml of anhydrous ethyl alcohol in a three-necked flask inside the glove box. The above mixture was stirred for 6 h at 70 °C, in order to fully dissolve ferric acetylacetonate. The atomic ratio of strontium–lanthanum mixture to iron was kept to 1:9.5–10, in order to compensate the (Sr + La) loss during heat treatment process. Then the Fe precursor was mixed with Sr + La precursor to form a clear mixture solution.

Afterwards, 45 ml ammonia solution was poured into the above mixture solution. The dispersion solution was maintained at 70 °C under stirring for 24 h and then moved out of the glove box. Through centrifugation (12,000 rpm) of the dispersion solution, water and organic molecules were removed and the remnant colloidal substance was calcined at 450 °C for 1 h. The calcined powders were ground in an agate mortar for 1 h and again heated at 800 °C for an hour to ensure the full removal of organic components. Finally, the powders were air-sintered at 1100 °C for 1 h to ensure the formation of pure La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 in magnetoplumbite structure. Phase identification was characterised by means of X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a D8 RIGAKU X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα. The magnetic properties of as-prepared powders was measured Using Quantum Design physical property measurement system (PPMS). The semiconducting feature of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 compound has been evaluated by a Lambda 750 UV–Vis-near infrared optical spectroscopy with an attachment of integral sphere. Photocatalytic characterization of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 powders was performed over degradation of MB by visible light. A 10.0 ppm MB solution was prepared by putting 0.05 g La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 powders in 50 ml MB solution. The catalytic suspension was firstly stirred in dark for 1 h, then irradiated under AULIGHT from a 300 W Xenon lamp with a cut filter employed to ensure visible light source (420–700 nm). Photo-degradation of MB was monitored in an interval of 30 min each by measuring the optical absorbance change of the degraded liquids using a Shimazu UV 2100 optical spectrometer.

Results and discussion

Structure of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19

The structure of the as-prepared La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 powders was detected by an X-ray diffractometer. Figure 1 shows the XRD pattern of as-prepared La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 powders; the underneath pink lines (a) are corresponding to the standard diffraction spectrum of pure SrFe12O19 (PDF#33-1340).

Fig. 1

XRD pattern for as-prepared La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 powders, the underneath pink spectrum represents standard diffraction lines from JCPD #33-1340 card. (Color figure online)

All the diffraction peaks of the La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 pattern match well with the standard spectrum of pure SrFe12O19, suggesting the formation of pure La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 compound. There is no second ferrite phase or any other oxide impurities. This diffraction pattern is truly in accordance with the typical formation of diffraction peaks for M-type hexaferrite. The charge has already been balanced by substituting 0.3 Sr2+ ions with 0.2 La3+ ions. The lattice parameters of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 are calculated to be a = 5.8724 Å and c = 23.014 Å in the hexagonal structure with space group P63/mmc. The unit cell volume of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19, however, has been contracted by 8.76 Å3 (0.59%) in comparison with that of SrFe12O19. The overlap of the two diffraction patterns suggests that La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 shares the same structure with SrFe12O19 and 0.2 La atoms have successfully substituted 0.3 Sr atomic sites of the SrFe12O19 lattice cells, leaving 10% sites vacant.

Microstructure features of LSFO powders

The microstructural features of LSFO powders sintered at 1100 °C for 1 h is shown in Fig. 2. Approximately the particle sizes have been calculated is of the order of 70 nm. The FESEM micrograph suggests that the size distribution of the particle is inhomogeneous with particles size as high as 500 nm and lowest as ~ 10 nm. But most of the particle are just about 100 nm. The shape of the particles are characteristically hexagonal with small variations. Variations in the shape like some of the particles show distorted plate-like/flake shaped structure.

Fig. 2

Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) image of LSFO powders being calcined at 1100 °C for 1 h

Semiconducting characterization of magnetic La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19

The as-sintered La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 powders were pressed into a φ40 × 3 mm concave hole on a steel holder, which was attached on an integrated sphere inside a Lambda 750 UV–Vis-near infrared spectrometer for optical measurement. Figure 4 shows the UV–Vis–NIR absorption spectrum of as-prepared La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 powders. The powders were sintered 1100 °C for 1 h and subsequently annealed at 800 °C in pure O2 atmosphere for three times. The absorption spectrum changes with the change in the difference between photon energy and band gap. The spectrum is composed of 4 segment lines, one within the wavelength region of 250–590 nm, one steeply dropping line within 590–830 nm, one gently sloping line within 830–1450 nm and the last flatline within 1450–2500 nm above. Two linear increasing slopes reflect typical semiconductor characterization with indirect band gap. The absorbance is very small when the photon energy is smaller than the band gap energy (λ > 1450 nm), since these photons do not have enough energy to excite the valence electrons to make a transition across the band gap into the conduction band. However, when the photon energy is comparable to the band gap energy, the absorbance demonstrates a sudden increase. The majority of the photons within this energy range (590 nm < λ < 1450 nm) were absorbed by the electrons near the top of valence band, those electrons gain the energy from the photons and are then excited to conduction band across the gap, resulting in a sudden rise of the absorbance of the photons. This suggests the absorbance happened in the visible region. When the photon energy is larger than the band gap, the absorption approaches to saturation, therefore the absorbance no longer increases. The peak locating at 590 nm could be assigned to the bounded exciton absorption of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19.

The absorption data was then plotted as a α2E2 versus E, in order to derivate the Tauc plot for determining the band gap energies of semiconducting La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 compound:

$${(\alpha E)^2}=A(E - {E_g})$$

Thus the fundamental process for a Tauc plot is to collect the absorbance data of the samples spanning from below the band gap transition to above it. The inset of Fig. 3 displays the Tauc plot of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19, where the (αE)2 is plotted versus the photon energy E. The occurrence of concave turning point between two sloped segment lines for the second power Tauc plot of (αE)2 versus E confirms the indirect allowed transition, indicating the feature of indirect bandgap characterization of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19. Linearly extrapolating the a2E2 edges with different slope to zero absorption extracts two lines. The intersection points of the two extrapolating lines with the X-axis are determined to be direct and indirect band gap energies, which are thus estimated to be Ed = 1.47 eV and Eid = 0.88 eV respectively, as being shown in the inset of Fig. 4. Both band gap energies are comparable to that of PbFe12O19 [30].

Fig. 3

UV–Vis-near infrared optical spectrum of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 powders, which were calcined at 1100 °C for 1 h and subsequent O2 heat-treated at 800 °C for three times

Fig. 4

Optical absorbance degradation of aqueous MB by photocatalytic process of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 suspension under visible light illumination, the spectrum starts from the illumination duration of 30 min and then all the way down to 6 h with an equal interval of 30 min

Another evidence for semiconducting characteristic of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 is the photocatalytic degradation process of organic compounds, which capture photon excited electrons from conduction band of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 and are degraded to smaller molecules. MB is a representative of a class of dyestuffs resistant to biodegradation. Here, we choose MB as the representative organic compound to check out the photo-degradation performance of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19, so as to further confirm its semiconducting feature. The degradation was carried out in the aqueous suspension of MB with small amount of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 powders under visible illumination.

Figure 5 displays the absorption coefficient decreasing with light illumination time, which reflects photo-degradation process of MB in the presence of La-substituted M-type strontium hexaferrite (La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19) powders. Under our experimental conditions, there are five maximal absorption peaks of the original MB at 664, 613, 334, 292 and 247 nm. Temporal changes in the concentration of MB were monitored by examining the variations in maximal absorption in UV–Visible spectra at 664 nm, which is one employed in most literatures [36,37,38]. Significant temporal concentration degradation of MB was witnessed by the quick descent absorption intensity with the duration of photocatalytic reaction. Figure 5 shows such quick concentration degradation of MB as a function of reaction time upon catalysis of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 powders. The concentration of MB degraded exponentially with photocatalytic reaction time. The optical intensity of the main absorption band at 664 nm attenuates down to 0.18 upon 6 h photocatalytic reaction with La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19, indicating that degradation of MB has almost completed.

Fig. 5

Time-dependent photocatalytic degradation process of MB by La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19

However, it is pretty interesting to note that the blue shifts of the five spectral bands of MB blue, which appeared during the course of photo-degradation process of MB in the presence of TiO2 and other catalysts [39, 40], did not appear in the present optical spectra for photo-degradation process of MB by La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19. It was reported that the spectral band at 664 nm blue-shifts by as much as 54 nm from 664 to 610 nm during the course of the MB photo-degradation by TiO2 [41]. These kinds of blue shifts were attributed to different steps of N-demethylation of MB during its photocatalytic degradation process [41]. In other words, MB was degraded into the final product in a multiple-steps manner, including N-demethylation, deamination and oxidative degradation in case of photocatalytic process of TiO2. The N-demethylated intermediates differ their maximum absorption peaks from MB and thus caused stepwise blue shifts [41]. When La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 was employed as photocatalyst for degradation of MB, the five absorption bands did not show any blue shifts with irradiation time, but the intensity decreases rapidly, as being shown in Fig. 4. The decrease in peak intensity with increase in time duration is attributed towards the conversion of pure MB to a photo-catalytically degraded inorganic compound of the same molecule. Non-blue shifts of the absorption bands indicate that no intermediates were formed during the course of photocatalytic degradation process of MB by La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19, the degradation process could complete in just one stepwise.

The reusability of the magnetic LSFO powders were determined by carrying out photocatalytic degradation with the powders already been used. The LSFO powders were used as photocatalyst for degradation of MB under visible light illumination, the optical spectra of first round degraded MB liquids is similar to that in Fig. 4. The LSFO powders were extracted out from the degraded MB liquids by a magnet, the powders were then cleaned up by acetone for three times to remove the remaining dye molecules on the surface. Afterwards, the powders were used again for the degradation of MB under visible light illumination. The same process was repeated for the third round. The reusability of the LSFO powders has been experimented for three consecutive rounds, the results of the subsequent two rounds are shown in Fig. 6. The spectra demonstrate that the degradation of MB takes 7 h for the second round process, the duration of which is almost equal to that of fresh LSFO powders. The spectrum of the third round degraded MB liquids remains unchanged as being shown in Fig. 6b. After subsequent consecutive rounds experiment, the degradation time remains the same with the rate of degradation of the first round one. After three rounds consecutive photocatalytic reactions, the magnetic LSFO powders were recycled from the degraded MB dye solution using a magnet successfully. This proves well the stability of activity and good reusability of LSFO powders for recycling photocatalytic degradation of MB.

Fig. 6

Optical absorbance spectra for the degradation of aqueous MB by photocatalytic process of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 suspension under visible light illumination with reusability of LSFO powders for three consecutive round experiments, a the second round experiment and b the third round one

Magnetic properties of La substituted SrFe12O19 compound

The magnetic properties of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 powders were measured by a PPMS at room temperature. Figure 7 displays the ferromagnetic hysteresis M–H loop of O2 annealed La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19. The magnetic properties of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 have been greatly improved in comparison with that of pure SrFe12O19 [42]. The remnant magnetic moment (M) and coercive field (HC) of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 compound are determined to be 52 emu/g and 5876 Oe, respectively. The coercive field (HC) is almost the same as pure SrFe12O19, but the remnant magnetic moment (Mr) of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 has been enhanced by around 69.4% in comparison with that of pure SrFe12O19 since the substituting La3+ provides one more unpaired electron spin. Similar improvement of the magnetic polarization was also observed in La–doped PbFe12O19 [43].

Fig. 7

Magnetic hysteresis loop of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 powders being sintered at 1100 °C for 1 h and subsequently annealed in pure O2 for 9 h

Sintering the specimen inside an oxygen deficient sealed air furnace would generate many Fe2+ ions and thus could deteriorate the magnetic polarisation ability of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19. Therefore, converting Fe2+ to Fe3+ during annealing in oxygen environment plays an important role on improving the magnetic performance of La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19, since Fe3+ could provide one more unpaired electron spin, which attributes toward larger magnetic polarisation in hexaferrite. With both better magnetic properties and excellent semiconducting feature, La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 is a kind of typical multifunctional material, which simultaneously integrates several functions of magnetics and optics into one structure. The combination of multiple functions in one phase could be able to trigger generation of new photocatalytic applications in environmental field in virtue of its magnetic semiconducting feature.

Magnetic semiconductor powders have great advantage over the conventional catalytic ones, since they could be made into magnetic fluid together with the organic dye molecules, which could be easily brought into magnetic suspension in water and greatly enhance the area of the catalysts exposing to the sunlight, as such the photocatalytic reaction efficient could be then greatly improved.


La modified strontium M-type hexaferrite (La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19), an M-type hexaferrite compound, was prepared by a polymer precursor method. The compound shows stronger magnetic performance with an average particle size of ~ 70 nm than pure SrFe12O19, the remnant magnetic moment (Mr) and coercive field (HC) reaches as high as 52 emu/g and 5876 Oe, respectively. In addition, it also demonstrates semiconducting feature, which was revealed by UV–Vis optical spectroscopy. The direct and indirect band gap energies were determined to be 1.47 and 0.88 eV, respectively. The photocatalytic degradation of MB has been tested on the aqueous dispersions containing La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19 powders under visible light illumination. Gradually with the increase in the duration of photodegradation reaction, the colour of the MB dispersion solution changes from deep blue to pale white, while the absorption intensity reduces rapidly from around 1.80 down to 0.18. The stability and reusability of the magnetic powders were examined successfully providing almost same degradation time with rate for two more consecutive processes. Hypsochromic effects resulting from N-demethylation of MB, which presented in case of photo-degradation of MB on TiO2 and other conventional catalysts, did not appear in this case. But oxidative degradation of MB occurred during irradiation, suggesting that the photo-degradation of MB into final product completes in just one stepwise.


  1. 1.

    A. Cochardt, J. Appl. Phys. 37, 1112 (1966)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    S.T. Fardood, A. Ramazani, Z. Golfar, S.W. Joo, Appl. Organomet. Chem. 31, e3823 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    A. Ramazani, S.T. Fardood, Z. Hosseinzadeh, F. Sadri, S.W. Joo, Iran. J.Catal. 7(3), 181–185 (2017)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    S.T. Fardood, A. Ramazani, S. Moradi, J. Sol-Gel. Sci. Technol. 82, 432–439 (2017)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    S.T. Fardood, Z. Golfar, A. Ramazani, J. Mater. Sci. 28, 17002–17008 (2017)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    S.T. Fardood, A. Ramazani, S. Moradi, Chem. J. Moldova 12(1), 115–118 (2017)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    S.T. Fardood, A. Ramazani, S. Moradi, P.A. Asiabi, J. Mater. Sci. 28, 13596–13601 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    K. Atrak, A. Ramazani, S.T. Fardood, J. Mater. Sci. (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    E.S. Mehr, M. Sorbiun, A. Ramazani, S.T. Fardood, J. Mater. Sci. 29, 1333–1340 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    M. Sorbiun, E.S. Mehr, A. Ramazani, S.T. Fardood, J. Mater. Sci. 29, 2806–2814 (2018)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    U. Ozgur, Y. Alivov, H. Morkoc, J. Mater. Sci. 20, 789 (2009)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    R.C. Pullar, Prog. Mater. Sci. 57, 1191–1334 (2012)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    A. Ataie, S. Heshmati-Manesh, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 21, 1951–1955 (2001)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    D.H. Chen, Y.Y. Chen, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 236, 41–46 (2001)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    M. Jean, V. Nachbaur, J. Bran, J.-M. Le Breton, J. Alloys Compd. 496, 306–312 (2010)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    T.M.H. Dang, V.D. Trinh, D.H. Bui, M.H. Phan, D.C. Huynh, Adv. Nat. Sci. 3, 025015–025021 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    X. Liu, W. Zhong, S. Yang, Z. Yu, B. Gu, Y. Du, Phys. Status Solidi A 193, 314–319 (2002)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    W. Zhang, Y. Bai, P. Zhu, T. Zhao, R. Sun, Ceram. Int. 40, 11199–11204 (2014)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    F. Sánchez-De, A.M. Jesús, C.A. Bolarín-Miró, R. Cortés-Escobedo, S. Valenzuela, Ammar, Ceram. Int. 40–3, 4033–4038 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    H. Kojima, in Handbook of Ferromagnetic Materials, vol. 3, ed. by E.P. Wohlfarth (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982), pp. 305–391

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    A.A. Nourbakhsh, M. Noorbakhsh, M. Nourbakhsh, M. Shaygan, K.J.D. Mackenzie, J. Mater. Sci. 22, 1297–1302 (2011)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    X.Q. Shen, M.Q. Liu, F.Z. Song, Y.W. Zhu, Appl. Phys. A 104A, 109–116 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    X.S. Liu, W. Zhong, S. Yang, Z. Yu, B.X. Gu, Y.W. Du, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 238, 207–214 (2002)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    M.R. Araki, A.A. Beslepkin, S.P. Kuntsevich, Mater. Lett. 57, 3427–3430 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    H. Luo, B.K. Rai, S.R. Mishra, V.V. Nguyen, J.P. Liu, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 324, 2602–2608 (2012)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    X.S. Liu, P. Hernandez-Go´mez, K. Huang, S.Q. Zhou, Y. Wang, X. Cai, H.J. Sun, B. Ma, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 305, 524–528 (2006)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    T.P. Xie, L.J. Xu, C.L. Liu, Powder Technol. 232, 87–92 (2012)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    S. Ounnunkad, P. Winotai, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 301, 292–300 (2006)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    C. Lei, S. Tang, Y. Du, Ceram. Int. 42, 15511–15516 (2016)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    S. Prathap, W. Madhuri, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 430, 114–122 (2017)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    T. Kauur, J. Sharma, S. Kumar, A.K. Srivastava, Cryst. Res. Technol. 52, 1700098 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    R. Asahi, T. Morikawa, T. Ohwaki, K. Aoki, Y. Taga, Science 293, 269 (2001)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    M.A. Fox, M.T. Dulay, Chem. Rev. 93, 341–357 (1993)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Y. Wang, R. Shi, J. Lin, Y. Zhu, Appl. Catal. B 100, 179–183 (2010)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    D. Zhao, G. Sheng, C. Chen, X. Wang, Appl. Catal. B 111, 303–308 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    S. Lakshmi, R. Renganathan, S. Fujita, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 88, 163–167 (1995)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    R.W. Matthews, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 85, 1291–1302 (1989)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    K. Sopajaree, S.A. Qasim, S. Basak, K. Rajeshwar, J. Appl. Electrochem. 29, 533–539 (1999)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    D. Kai, L. Lu, G. Dawson, J. Huaibei Norm. Univ. 22, 1035–1040 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    T. Zhang, T. Oyama, A. Aoshima, H. Hidaka, J. Zhao, N. Serpone, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 140, 163–172 (2001)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Z. Zhou, Z. Wang, X. Wang, X. Wang, J. Zhang, F. Dou, M. Jin, J. Xu, J. Alloys Compd. 610, 264–270 (2014)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    G.L. Tan, Y. Huang, H.H. Sheng, PLoS ONE 11(12), e0167084 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    G.L. Tan, H.H. Sheng, Acta Mater. 121, 144 (2016)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors appreciate Dr Xiaoguang Huang for the support of optical spectrum and photocatalytic measurements. The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 11774276.

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Debesh Devadutta Mishra or Guolong Tan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, D.D., Huang, Y., Duan, N. et al. Visible photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue on magnetic semiconducting La0.2Sr0.7Fe12O19. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 29, 9854–9860 (2018).

Download citation