Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics

, Volume 28, Issue 21, pp 16106–16119 | Cite as

Effect of Ge addition on wettability, copper dissolution, microstructural and mechanical behavior of SnCu–Ge solder alloy

  • M. Hasnine
  • B. Tolla
  • M. Karasawa
Article

Abstract

This paper explores the effects of Germanium (Ge) addition on the wetting behavior, copper dissolution, IMC formation, microstructure and mechanical behavior of SnCu alloy. Static copper dissolution was conducted as a function of contact time and in the temperature range of 260–300 °C. The results show that the Ge doped alloy has the lowest copper dissolution rate compared to SnCu, SAC305, and very much comparable with SnPb solder thus making it suitable alloy for the wave soldering process. Two solderability standards measurement (JIS vs. IPC) have been executed on different surface finishes such as OSP, ENIG, ImAg commonly used in industrial soldering process. The results showed that addition of Ge significantly improves the wetting/spread performance for all the surface finishes (ENIG, OSP and ImAg). Contact angles range from 17°–30°, the lowest contact angles being observed on ENIG surface. Microstructural analysis showed Ge addition refine the grain structure of SnCu–0.01Ge alloy. A thin IMC layer was observed, and IMC growth was not significant after multiple reflows as compared to Sn–Cu alloy. Similarly, Ge addition increases the hardness value due to uniform microstructure of SnCu–Ge alloy. The tensile testing results also showed an increase in tensile strength and tolerable ductility.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Kester R & D, material science division. The authors thankful to ITW Tech Center and Buehler for sample preparation and analysis.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Abtew, G. Selvaduray, Lead free solders in microelectronics. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 27, 95–141 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.W. Evans, A Guide to Lead-Free Solders: Physical Metallurgy and Reliability, Springer, New York, 2007Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H.Z. Huang, X.Q. Wei, D.Q. Tan, L. Zhou, Effects of phosphorus addition on the properties of Sn–9Zn lead free solder alloy. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 6, 563–567 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Xian, G.L. Gong, Oxidation behavior of molten tin doped with phosphorus. J. Electron. Mater. 12, 1669–1678 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K.M. Watling, A. Chandler-Temple, K. Nogita, XPS analysis of oxide films on lead free solders with trace additions of germanium and gallium. Mater. Sci. Forum 857, 63–67 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    X. Yan, K. Xu, J. Wang, X. Wei, W. Wang, Effect of P and Ge doping on microstructure of Sn-0.3 Ag-0.7 Cu/Ni–P solder joints, Soldering Surf. Mount Technol. 28, 215–221 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E.P. Leng, W.T. Ling, N. Amin, I. Ahmad, T.Y. Han, C.W. Chiao, A.S.M.A. Haseeb, BGA lead free C5 solder system improvement by Germanium addition to Sn3.5Ag and Sn-3.8 Ag-0.7 Cu solder alloy. in Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, pp. 82–91, 2009Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.G. Cho, S.K. Seo, H.M. Lee, Undercooling, microstructures and hardness of Sn-rich Pb-free solders on Cu-xZn alloy under bump metallurgies. Mater. Trans. 50, 2291–2296 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Sharif, Y.C. Chan, Dissolution kinetics of BGA Sn–Pb and Sn–Ag solders with Cu substrates during reflow. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 106, 126–131 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Byle, D. Jean, D. Lee, A study of copper dissolution in Pb-Free solder fountain systems, in Proceedings of SMTA International, 2006Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Maio, C.P. Hunt, On the factors affecting the dissolution of copper in molten lead free solders and development of a method to assess the soldering parameters. Soldering Surf. Mount Technol. 21, 24–31 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.F. Li, S.H. Mannan, M.P. Clode, D.C. Whalley, D.A. Hutt, Interfacial reactions between molten Sn–Bi–X solders and Cu substrates for liquid solder interconnects. Acta Mater. 54, 2907–2922 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Humpston, D.M. Jacobson, Solder spread: a criterion for evaluation of soldering. Gold Bull. 3, 83–96 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P.T. Vianco, An overview of surface finishes and their role in printed circuit board solderability and solder joint performance. Circ. World 25, 6–24 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.F. Arenas, V.L. Acoff, Contact angle measurements of Sn–Ag and Sn–Cu lead free solders on copper substrates. J. Electron. Mater. 12, 1452–1458 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S.H. Wang, T.S. Chin, C.F. Yang, S.W. Chen, C.T. Chuang, Pb-free solder alloy based on Sn–Zn–Bi with the addition of germanium. J. Alloys Compd. 497, 428–431 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R.J.K. Wassink, Soldering in Electronics: A Comprehensive Treatise on Soldering Technology for Surface Mounting and Through Hole Techniques, Electrochemical Publications, Scotland, 1994Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R.W. Hertzberg, Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials, 4th edn. Wiley, New York, 1996Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    F. Lang, H. Tanaka, O. Munegata, T. Taguchi, T. Narita, The effect of strain rate and temperature on the tensile properties of Sn–3.5 Ag solder. Mater. Charact. 54(3), 223–229 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kester Inc, Global Leader in Electronic MaterialsItascaUSA

Personalised recommendations