Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tailoring microstructure and mechanical anisotropy of laser-MIG hybrid additive manufacturing TC11 titanium alloy through solution aging treatment

  • Metals & corrosion
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mechanisms of microstructure transformation and mechanical anisotropy of laser-MIG hybrid additive manufacturing TC11 titanium alloy after solution aging treatment are investigated. In this paper, different solution temperatures and cooling modes are applied to tailor the microstructure and improve high-temperature properties and anisotropy. The result shows the microstructure of the samples in the as-deposited state is dominated by a widmanstatten structure composed of lamellar α clusters. Following solution aging treatment, a large area of basket-weave structure is obtained in the samples. A major influence of spheroidization of lamellar α clusters and dynamic recrystallization on mechanical anisotropy is revealed. The heat-treated samples exhibit more superior combined strength, elongation, impact toughness. The hardness difference between the layers and mechanical anisotropy decreases. During high-temperature tensile tests, the tensile strength increases with rising solution temperature; while, the elongation shows the opposite trend. The tensile fracture exhibits abundant uniform equiaxed dimples, and the fracture mode changes from intergranular fracture to transgranular fracture. Solution treatment at 990 °C for 2 h followed by air cooling is considered to be the optimal heat treatment process. Consequently, it results in a high tensile strength of 811 MPa and an excellent impact toughness of 50 J, representing improvements of 16.08% and 71.08%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Song T, Chen Z, Cui X, Lu S, Chen H, Wang H, Dong T, Qin B, Chan KC, Brandt M, Liao X, Ringer SP, Qian M (2023) Strong and ductile titanium–oxygen–iron alloys by additive manufacturing. Nature 618:63–68. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05952-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sola A, Trinchi A (2023) Boron-induced microstructural manipulation of titanium and titanium alloys in additive manufacturing. Virtual Phys Prototyp. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2023.2230467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hu Q, Miao J, Wang X, Li C, Fang K (2021) Microstructure and properties of ER50-6 steel fabricated by wire arc additive manufacturing. Scanning 2021:e7846116. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7846116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh P, Pungotra H, Kalsi NS (2017) On the characteristics of titanium alloys for the aircraft applications. Mater Today Proc 4:8971–8982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Emiralioğlu A, Ünal R (2022) Additive manufacturing of gamma titanium aluminide alloys: a review. J Mater Sci 57:4441–4466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-06896-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gu J, Li R, Qiu Y, Yue H, Liu B, Gu H (2020) Microstructure, mechanical properties, and residual stress distribution of AISI 316L stainless steel part fabricated by laser metal deposition. Scanning 2020:e4831798. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4831798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ackers MA, Messé OMDM, Manninen N, Stryzhyboroda O, Hecht U (2022) Additive manufacturing of TTFNZ (Ti–4.5Ta–4Fe–7.5Nb–6Zr), a novel metastable β-titanium alloy for advanced engineering applications. J Alloys Compd 920:165899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Asherloo M, Wu Z, Sabisch JEC, Ghamarian I, Rollett AD, Mostafaei A (2023) Variant selection in laser powder bed fusion of non-spherical Ti–6Al–4V powder. J Mater Sci Technol 147:56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2022.10.045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dixit S, Dash BB, Kumar D, Bhattacharjee A, Sankaran S (2023) Influence of phase morphology, static recrystallization, and crystallographic texture on room temperature tensile properties of Ti–6Al–4V alloy: Comparison between post-tested equiaxed, bimodal, and lamellar microstructures. Mater Sci Eng A 873:144990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2023.144990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang H, Tan C, Zhao J, Han L, Zhang G (2023) Effect of creep stress on the high-temperature tensile stability of TC11 titanium alloy. J Mater Sci 58:5503–5515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08307-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaschel FR, Vijayaraghavan RK, McNally PJ, Dowling DP, Celikin M (2021) In-situ XRD study on the effects of stress relaxation and phase transformation heat treatments on mechanical and microstructural behaviour of additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V. Mater Sci Eng Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process 819:141534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.141534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu D, Wu D, Ge C, Lu H, Chen Z, Liu M, Wang Y, Niu F, Ma G, Luo K, Lu J (2023) Superior strength of laser-arc hybrid additive manufactured Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy enabled by a tunable microstructure. Addit Manuf 68:103526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.103526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Qi K, Chen J, Liu B, Wang F (2022) Effects of different post-weld heat treatment conditions on mechanical properties and microstructure of welded joints. Int J Mod Phys B 36:2240051. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979222400513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Varenne C, Prima F, Brozek C, Bourgon J, Besson J, Gourgues-Lorenzon A-F (2021) High impact resistance of a TWIP β titanium alloy: linking the multi-scale deformation and fracture mechanisms. J Mater Sci 56:5201–5214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05582-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu Z, Wang H, Tang H, Cheng X, Zhu Y (2022) Microstructure, microsegregation and mechanical properties of directed energy deposited Ti–32Mo titanium alloy. J Mater Sci 57:12540–12555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07369-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lekoadi P, Tlotleng M, Annan K, Maledi N, Masina B (2021) Evaluation of heat treatment parameters on microstructure and hardness properties of high-speed selective laser melted Ti6Al4V. Metals 11:255. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11020255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaushik HC, Korayem MH, Shaha SK, Kacher J, Hadadzadeh A (2023) Achieving strength-ductility synergy in a laser-powder bed fused near-α titanium alloy through well-crafted heat treatments. J Alloys Compd 968:171913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171913

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bai H, Deng H, Chen L, Liu X, Qin X, Zhang D, Liu T, Cui X (2021) Effect of heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser-melted Ti64 and Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–1Cr–1Fe. Metals 11:534. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11040534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu T, Liu J, Wang J, Lu T, Ma S, Liu C (2022) Layer control method and mechanical anisotropy of titanium alloy based on double-hot-wire arc additive manufacturing. J Manuf Process 82:448–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.08.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee S, Ahmadi Z, Pegues JW, Mahjouri-Samani M, Shamsaei N (2021) Laser polishing for improving fatigue performance of additive manufactured Ti–6Al–4V parts. Opt Laser Technol 134:106639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruiz De Sotto M, Doquet V, Longère P, Papasidero J (2022) Anisotropic, rate-dependent ductile fracture of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Int J Damage Mech 31:374–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567895211036491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ansari M, Martinez-Marchese A, Khamooshi M, Keshavarzkermani A, Esmaeilizadeh R, Toyserkani E (2022) Analytical modeling of multi-track powder-fed laser directed energy deposition: on the relationships among process, deposition dimensions, and solidification microstructure in additively manufactured near-β titanium alloy. J Mater Process Technol 306:117643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hao Y, Huang Y, Zhao K, Qi C, Du Y (2022) Research on the microstructure and mechanical properties of doubled annealed laser melting deposition TC11 titanium alloy. Opt Laser Technol 150:107983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.107983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Eshawish N, Malinov S, Sha W, Walls P (2021) Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti–6Al–4V manufactured by selective laser melting after stress relieving, hot isostatic pressing treatment, and post-heat treatment. J Mater Eng Perform 30:5290–5296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05753-w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang L, Li W, Luan S, Jin P, Wang J, Ren Q, Zhu L (2023) Study on hot deformation behavior of as-cast Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–1Cr–1Fe titanium alloy in (α + β) phase region. Mater Today Commun 35:105797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105797

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Z, Zhu X, Zhang Y (2022) Effect of annealing treatment on microstructure and tensile properties of Ti–48Al–2Cr–5Nb alloy fabricated by laser additive manufacturing. Opt Laser Technol 155:108412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Muhammad M, Pegues JW, Shamsaei N, Haghshenas M (2019) Effect of heat treatments on microstructure/small-scale properties of additive manufactured Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103:4161–4172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03789-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Balachandran S, Kumar S, Banerjee D (2017) On recrystallization of the α and β phases in titanium alloys. Acta Mater 131:423–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Klein T, Paul MJ, Simson C, Niedermayer J, Gludovatz B (2022) Phase decomposition upon heat-treatment of a eutectoid Ti–Fe alloy processed by dual-wire-arc additive manufacturing. Mater Lett 319:132305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2022.132305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Del Guercio G, Galati M, Saboori A (2021) Electron beam melting of Ti–6Al–4V lattice structures: correlation between post heat treatment and mechanical properties. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 116:3535–3547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07619-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen K, Fan Q, Yang L, Xu S, Yao J, Gao Y, Lei W (2022) A novel sequential mechanism associated with stress-induced β→ω→β+α phase transformation in Ti–6Mo–3.5Cr–1Zr titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 849:143355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.143355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bermingham M, StJohn D, Easton M, Yuan L, Dargusch M (2020) Revealing the mechanisms of grain nucleation and formation during additive manufacturing. JOM 72:1065–1073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-020-04019-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zuo H, Deng H, Zhou L, Qiu W, Xu P, Wei Y, Peng H, Xia Z, Tang J (2022) The effect of heat treatment on corrosion behavior of selective laser melted Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–3Cr–1Zr alloy. Surf Coat Technol 445:128743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128743

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang X, Chou K (2018) EBSD study of beam speed effects on Ti–6Al–4V alloy by powder bed electron beam additive manufacturing. J Alloys Compd 748:236–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nochovnaya NA, Shiryaev AA, Davydova EA (2023) Influence of manufacturing parameters on pseudo-β-titanium alloy VT47 sheet structural state and mechanical property anisotropy. Metallurgist 66:1216–1224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-023-01434-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Baby J, Amirthalingam M (2020) Microstructural development during wire arc additive manufacturing of copper-based components. Weld World 64:395–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-019-00840-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Yuhang Duan for guidance on experimental design and data analysis. Appreciation also goes to Dr. Juan Fu for assistance with mechanical testing and strengthening mechanism insights. Thanks are extended to Mr. Guoqiang Chen, Mr. Yonghui Qin and Mr. Shuming Song for microscopy sample preparation and imaging support. The first author acknowledges the mentorship of Professor Yong Zhao in additive manufacturing research. This work benefited greatly from the collaborative research environment fostered by all involved.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jilong Guo contributed to conceptualization, investigation, data curation, experiments, and writing—original draft preparation. Yang Liu contributed to investigation, experiments, and writing—review & editing. Yong Zhao contributed to investigation, supervision, funding acquisition, and writing—review & editing. Feiyun Wang contributed to data curation, supervision, and writing—review & editing. Yuhang Duan contributed to software and experiments. Guoqiang Chen contributed to supervision and funding acquisition. Yonghui Qin contributed to investigation. Shuming Song contributed to funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethics approval

The authors state that the present work is in compliance with the ethical standards.

Consent to participate

All the authors consent to participate in this work.

Consent for publication

All authors agree to publish.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Zhao Shen.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, J., Liu, Y., Zhao, Y. et al. Tailoring microstructure and mechanical anisotropy of laser-MIG hybrid additive manufacturing TC11 titanium alloy through solution aging treatment. J Mater Sci 59, 9625–9642 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09748-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09748-5

Navigation