Skip to main content
Log in

Additive manufacturing of continuous BF-reinforced PES composite material and mechanical and wear properties evaluation

  • Composites & nanocomposites
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fiber-reinforced thermoplastic polymer composites are widely applied in engineering. The use of continuous fibers in these composites provides superior mechanical properties and material performance compared with those achieved when short fibers are used. In this study, pure poly(ethersulfone) (PES) and its continuous fiber-reinforced composites were manufactured using fused deposition modeling 3D printing technology. PES composite filaments reinforced with continuous basalt fiber (BF) were prepared. The method and temperature for printing the BF-reinforced PES, the strength of the interfacial bonding between the BF and the PES matrix, and the abrasiveness of the composite were all studied in detail. The results revealed that PES printed at 360 °C exhibits the highest tensile strength. Furthermore, the tensile and bending strengths of the PES/BF composite were found to be increased by 217.06\(\%\) and 87.96%, respectively, compared with those of pure PES. To improve the interfacial bonding properties between the fiber and resin matrix, the fiber was modified using a silane coupling agent. This decreased the mass wear and the wear scar width by 80% and 45%, respectively, compared with those for pure PES.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rahaman SJ, Mukherjee M, Sarkhel G (2012) Effect of zirconium phosphate on structural, thermal, and electrical properties of polyether sulfone (PES) membrane. Int J Polym Mater 61(9):655–668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rao VL (1999) Polyether sulfones. J macromol sci, Rev macromol chem phys C39(4):655–711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gotham K, Turner S (1974) Poly (ether sulphone) as an engineering material. Polymer 15(10):665–670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lu D, Zou H, Guan R, Dai H, Lu L (2005) Sulfonation of polyethersulfone by chlorosulfonic acid. Polym Bull 54(1–2):21–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Guo H, Ma Y, Chen S (2010) Development and application prospect of continuous basalt fiber. China Fiber Inspection 10:76–79

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shi Q (2003) Development and application of continuous basalt fiber abroad. Fiber Glass 4:27–31

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xie E, Li Z (2003) Application prospect of basalt fiber. Fiber Coposites 20(3):17–21

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen D (2014) The development and application of continuous basalt fiber. Hi-Tech Fiber Appl 6:27-20,29 [in Chinese]

  9. Yang C, Tian X, Li D et al (2017) Influence of thermal processing conditions in 3D printing on the crystallinity and mechanical properties of PEEK material. J Mater Process Technol 248:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao F, Li D, Jin Z (2018) Preliminary investigation of poly-ether-ether-ketone based on fused deposition modeling for medical applications. Materials 11(2):288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin X, Zhang F, Zhou Y (2013) Progress of research on basalt fiber and composites. Fiber Glass 2:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hu X, Shen T (2005) The applications of the CBF in war industry & civil fields. Hi-Tech Fiber Appl 30(6):7–13

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2015) Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects. Adv Manuf 3(1):42–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun Q, Rizvi GM, Bellehumeur CT et al (2008) Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments. Rapid Prototyp J 14(2):72–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dudek P (2013) FDM 3D printing technology in manufacturing composite elements. Arch Metall Mater 58(4):1415–1418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Casavola C, Cazzato A, Moramarco V et al (2016) Orthotropic mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling parts described by classical laminate theory. Mater Des 90:453–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahn SH, Montero M, Odell D et al (2002) Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyp J 8(4):248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Anouar EM, Khalil EM (2021) Se´bastien V, Preparation and characterization of poly(ether ether ketone)/poly(ether imide) [PEEK/PEI] blends for fused filament fabrication. Polym Biopolym 56:14348–14367

    Google Scholar 

  19. Melnikova R, Ehrmann A, Finsterbusch K (2014) 3D printing of textile-based structures by fused deposition modelling (FDM) with different polymer materials. IOP Conf Ser 62(1):012018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nuñez PJ, Rivas A, García-Plaza E et al (2015) Dimensional and surface texture characterization in fused deposition modelling (FDM) with ABS plus. Proced Eng 132:856–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Cano S, Schuschnigg S et al (2018) Additive manufacturing of metallic and ceramic components by the material extrusion of highly-filled polymers: a review and future perspectives. Materials 11(5):840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dou H, Cheng Y, Ye W et al (2020) Effect of process parameters on tensile mechanicalproperties of 3D printing continuous carbon fiber-reinforced PLA composites. Materials 13(17):3850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Milan V, Milan S, Jaroslav M et al (2020) Impact toughness of FRTP composites produced by 3D printing. Materials 13(24):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  24. John MP, Aditya RT, Ming CL et al (2021) A parametric study and characterization of additively manufactured continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites for high-speed 3D printing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113(7–8):2137–2151

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gantenbein S, Masania K, Woigk W et al (2018) Three-dimensional printing of hierarchical liquid-crystal-polymer structures. Nature 561(7722):226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Geng P, Zhao J, Wu W et al (2018) Effect of thermal processing and heat treatment condition on 3D printing PPS properties. Polymers 10(8):875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu W, Ye W, Geng P et al (2018) 3D printing of thermoplastic PI and interlayer bonding evaluation. Mater Lett 229:206–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Li LG, Xiao BF, Fang ZQ et al (2021) Feasibility of glass/basalt fiber reinforced seawater coral sand mortar for 3D printing. Addit Manuf 37:101684–101696

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Siwon Yu, Hwang Yun Hyeong, Hwang Jun Yeon et al (2019) Analytical study on the 3D-printed structure and mechanical properties of basalt fiber-reinforced PLA composites using X-ray microscopy. Compos SciTechnol 175:18–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bakar nSA, Alkahari MR, Boejang H (2010) Analysis on fused deposition modelling performance. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A 11(12):972–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jia L, Geng H (2015) The Arts and crafts model based on FDM. Equip Manuf Technol 7:209–211

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chen B (2012) Experimental study on process and precision of fused deposition modeling. Dalian University of Technology [in Chinese]

  33. Gu P, Li L (2002) Fabrication of biomedical prototypes with locally controlled properties using FDM. CIRP Ann 51(1):181–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yardimci MA, Güçeri S (1996) Conceptual framework for the thermal process modelling of fused deposition. Rapid Prototyp J 2(2):26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yan Y, Zhang R, Hong G et al (2000) Research on the bonding of material paths in melted extrusion modeling. Mater Des 21(2):93–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Gan Y, Chen D, Zhang Y (1995) Current status of fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite materials. Fiber Compos 4:10–13 [in Chinese]

  37. Brighenti R, Carpinteri A, Scorza D (2016) Mechanics of interface debonding in fibre-reinforced materials. J Compos Mater 50(19):2699–2718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Khaldi M, Vivet A, Bourmaud A et al (2016) Damage analysis of composites reinforced with Alfa fibers: viscoelastic behavior and debonding at the fiber/matrix interface. J Appl Polym Sci 133(31):43760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Guillebaud-Bonnafous C, Vasconcellos D, Touchard F et al (2012) Experimental and numerical investigation of the interface between epoxy matrix and hemp yarn. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 43(11):2046–2058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the key technology research and development project of Jilin Province "High-performance special engineering plastics 3D printing key technology and equipment research" (No. 20180201055GX) and Jilin Province industrial innovation special project "Fiber-reinforced thermoplastic polyimide 3D printing equipment and technology research" (No. 2019C038-1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han Qu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that that they had NO known competing financial interests in the subject matter or personal relationships which had or could be perceived to have influenced the work discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Chris Cornelius.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, W., Li, Z., Lin, G. et al. Additive manufacturing of continuous BF-reinforced PES composite material and mechanical and wear properties evaluation. J Mater Sci 57, 12903–12915 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07425-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07425-z

Navigation