Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Insights into structural difference between sodium polyacrylate PAA and sodium polymethacrylate PMA in salt solutions investigated by molecular simulations

  • Computational Materials Design
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The difference in the structural properties of highly charged polyacrylic acid (PAA) and polymethacrylic acid (PMA) is investigated by atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in the presence of divalent salt magnesium chloride. A united-atom model approach was used to represent the backbone methylene groups in both the polymers. The salt concentration (Cs) dependence of conformational radius of gyration (Rg) and chain persistence length (Lp) is discussed in detail for PAA and PMA. The Rg showed a decrease with Cs for both PAA and PMA. However, the PMA Rg is greater than PAA at the salt concentration range of 0.1 < Cs < 0.9 M. The chain stiffness calculated by Lp demonstrated a decrease with Cs for both PAA and PMA. However, the Lp of PMA at Cs ≥ 0.7 M is greater than PAA, rendering it stiffer than its counterpart at higher salt concentration. The total number of intermolecular hydrogen bonds between PAA and water is greater compared to PMA–water at all Cs values. This behavior may be attributed to methyl side groups in PMA, rendering it more hydrophobic. The coordination number value for PAA–water is greater than the PMA–water pair across the entire Cs range. However, the number of h-bonds does not change with variations in Cs for both PAA and PMA. The degree of counterion binding to the polyelectrolyte quantified by coordination number shows a decrease with Cs due to an increase in salt concentration and replacement of Na+ counterions by divalent Mg2+ salt ions for PAA and PMA. The spatial distribution of salt ions shows an increase in PAA-Mg2+ and PMA-Mg2+ coordination number with Cs. However, the coordination number for PAA-Mg2+ is greater than its counterpart at all Cs values indicating a significant electrostatic charge screening in the case of the PAA compared to PMA. Overall, the understanding pertaining to the differences in the microstructure, hydrogen bonding, intermolecular structure, and salt-ion distribution around PAA and PMA in the dilute aqueous divalent salt solution is significantly advanced in the present work.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carrillo JMY, Dobrynin AV (2011) Polyelectrolytes in salt solutions: Molecular dynamics simulations. Macromolecules 44:5798–5816. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma2007943

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dobrynin AV, Rubinstein M (2005) Theory of polyelectrolytes in solutions and at surfaces. Prog Polym Sci 30:1049–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2005.07.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dobrynin AV (2008) Theory and simulations of charged polymers: From solution properties to polymeric nanomaterials. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 13:376–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2008.03.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Colby RH (2010) Structure and linear viscoelasticity of flexible polymer solutions: Comparison of polyelectrolyte and neutral polymer solutions. Rheol Acta 49:425–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-009-0413-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. De Gennes PG, Pincus P, Velasco RM, Brochard F (1976) Remarks on polyelectrolyte conformation. J Phys 37:1461–1473. https://doi.org/10.1051/jphys:0197600370120146100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Estahbanati MRK, Feilizadeh M, Attar F, Iliuta MC (2021) Current developments and future trends in photocatalytic glycerol valorization: photocatalyst development. Ind Eng Chem Res. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c04765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sappidi P, Muralidharan SS, Natarajan U (2014) Conformations and hydration structure of hydrophobic polyelectrolyte atactic poly(ethacrylic acid) in dilute aqueous solution as a function of neutralisation. Mol Simul 40:295–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927022.2013.803551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vao-soongnern V, Merat K, Horpibulsuk S (2016) Interaction of the calcium ion with poly(acrylic acid) as investigated by a combination of molecular dynamics simulation and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. J Polym Res 23:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-015-0895-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Frster S, Schmidtt M, Polymerforschung M, Mainz D (1989) Static and dynamic light scattering by aqueous polyelectrolyte solutions: effect of molecular weight charge, density and added salt. Polymer (Guildf) 31:781–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hriberšek P, Kogej K (2019) Effect of multivalent cations on intermolecular association of isotactic and atactic poly(methacrylic acid) chains in aqueous solutions. Polymers (Basel) 11:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11040605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Beer M, Schmidt M, Muthukumar M (1997) The electrostatic expansion of linear poly electrolytes: effects of gegenions, co-ions, and hydrophobicity. Macromolecules 30:8375–8385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sitar S, Aseyev V, Žagar E, Kogej K (2019) Chain dynamics and intermolecular association in dilute aqueous solutions of isotactic and atactic Poly (Methacrylic acid): Effect of NaCl concentration. Polymer 174:1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huber K (1993) Calcium-induced shrinking of polyacrylate chains in aqueous solution. J Phys Chem 97:9825–9830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schweins R, Goerigk G, Huber K (2006) Shrinking of anionic polyacrylate coils induced by Ca2+, Sr2+ and Ba2+: a combined light scattering and ASAXS study. Europ Phys J E 21:99–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roiter Y, Trotsenko O, Tokarev V (2010) Single molecule experiments visualizing adsorbed polyelectrolyte molecules in the full range of mono- and divalent counter ion concentration. J Am Chem Soc 132:13660–13662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Koene RS, Mandel M (1983) Scaling relations for aqueous polyelectrolyte-salt solutions. 1. Quasi-elastic light scattering as a function of polyelectrolyte concentration and molar mass. Macromolecules 16(2):220–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Koene RS, Nicolai T, Mandel M (1983) Scaling relations for aqueous polyelectrolyte-salt solutions. 2. Quasi-elastic light scattering as a function of polyelectrolyte concentration and salt concentration. Macromolecules 16(2):227–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sarraguça JMG (2003) Structure of polyelectrolytes in 3: 1 salt solutions Structure of polyelectrolytes in 3: 1 salt solutions. J Chem Phys 119:12621–12628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wei YF, Hsiao PY (2010) Effect of chain stiffness on ion distributions around a polyelectrolyte in multivalent salt solutions. J Chem Phys 132:024905-1–024905-12

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wei YF, Hsiao PY (2007) Role of chain stiffness on the conformation of single polyelectrolytes in salt solutions. J Chem Phys 127:064901-1–064901-14

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu S, Ghosh K, Muthukumar M (2003) Polyelectrolyte solutions with added salt: a simulation study. J Chem Phys 119:1813–1823

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hsiao PY, Luijten E (2006) Salt-induced collapse and reexpansion of highly charged flexible polyelectrolytes. Phys Rev Lett 97:148301-1–148301-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hsiao PY (2006) Chain morphology, swelling exponent, persistence length, like-charge attraction, and charge distribution around a chain in polyelectrolyte solutions: effects of salt concentration and ion size studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Macromolecules 39(20):7125–7137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kłos J, Pakula T (2005) Computer simulations of a polyelectrolyte chain with a mixture of multivalent salts. J Phys: Condens Matter 17(37):5635–5645

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gupta AK (2021) Combined salt concentration and degree-of-ionization effect on the structure of poly (methacrylic acid) in aqueous solutions as revealed by molecular dynamics simulations. Ind Eng Chem Res 60(13):4806–4819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Accelrys Software Inc: Materials Studio Modeling Environment. Release 5.0. San Diego: USA; 2007.

  27. Gupta AK (2021) Salt ions induced transport properties of poly (methacrylic acid) PMA in aqueous solutions studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Mater Today: Proc 1(44):2380–2385

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gupta AK (2021) Molecular dynamics simulations studies of transport properties of sodium-(polymethacrylate)(Na+-PMA) in aqueous solutions–Effect of salt concentration. Mater Today: Proc 1(43):3085–3090

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gupta AK, Natarajan U (2016) Tacticity effects on conformational structure and hydration of poly- (methacrylic acid) in aqueous solutions-a molecular dynamics simulation study. Mol Simul 42:725–736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gupta AK, Natarajan U (2017) Anionic polyelectrolyte poly (acrylic acid)(PAA) chain shrinkage in water–ethanol solution in presence of Li+ and Cs+ metal ions studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Mol Simul 43:625–637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen HJ, Fraaije JG (1997) LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J Comput Chem 18:1463–1472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chremos A, Douglas JF (2016) Counter-ion distribution around flexible polyelectrolytes having different molecular architecture. Soft Matter 12:2932–2941

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Schweins R, Huber K (2001) Collapse of sodium polyacrylate chains in calcium salt solutions. Eur Phys J E 5(1):117–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Prabhu VM, Muthukumar M, Wignall GD, Melnichenko YB (2003) Polyelectrolyte chain dimensions and concentration fluctuations near phase boundaries. J Chem Phys 119(7):4085–4098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Prabhu VM, Muthukumar M, Wignall GD, Melnichenko YB (2001) Dimensions of polyelectrolyte chains and concentration fluctuations in semidilute solutions of sodium–poly (styrene sulfonate) as measured by small-angle neutron scattering. Polymer 42(21):8935–8946

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Le Bret M (1982) Electrostatic contribution to the persistence length of a polyelectrolyte. J Chem Phys 76(12):6243–6255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fixman M (1982) The flexibility of polyelectrolyte molecules. J Chem Phys 76(12):6346–6353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Odijk T (1977) Polyelectrolytes near the rod limit. J Polym Sci: Polymer Phys Ed 15(3):477–483

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Förster S, Schmidt M, Antonietti M (1992) Experimental and theoretical investigation of the electrostatic persistence length of flexible polyelectrolytes at various ionic strengths. J Phys Chem 96(10):4008–4014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Oosawa, F. Polyelectrolytes; Marcel Dekker, 1971

  41. Washizu H, Kikuchi K (2002) Electrical polarizability of polyelectrolytes in salt-free aqueous solution. J Phys Chem B 106:11329–11342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Callahan KM, Casillas-Ituarte NN, Roeselová M, Allen HC, Tobias DJ (2010) Solvation of magnesium dication: molecular dynamics simulation and vibrational spectroscopic study of magnesium chloride in aqueous solutions. J Phys Chem A 114(15):5141–5148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Pálinkás G, Radnai T (1982) Hydration shell structures in an MgCl2 solution from X-ray and MD studies. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A 37(9):1049–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Albright JN (1972) X-Ray diffraction studies of aqueous alkaline-earth chloride solutions. J Chem Phys 56(8):3783–3786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Skipper NT, Neilson GW, Cummings SC (1989) An X-ray diffraction study of Ni (aq) 2+ and Mg (aq) 2+ by difference methods. J Phys: Condens Matter 1(22):3489–3506

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the School of Technology, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, for providing the necessary computing resources to perform the simulations presented in this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Technology, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, 382426, India

    Abhishek Kumar Gupta & Siddhant Gohil

Authors
  1. Abhishek Kumar Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Siddhant Gohil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhishek Kumar Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Additional information

Handling Editor: M. Grant Norton.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 4662 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, A.K., Gohil, S. Insights into structural difference between sodium polyacrylate PAA and sodium polymethacrylate PMA in salt solutions investigated by molecular simulations. J Mater Sci 57, 10569–10584 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06836-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06836-8

Search

Navigation