Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rational design of hierarchical C–MgO@ZnO nanofiber as sulfur host for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries

  • Energy materials
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of sulfur cathode materials for lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries has significant technical challenges owing to poor conductivity and “shuttle effect” of the polysulfide dissolution. In recently, many efforts have been made to improve the electrochemical performance of cathode materials for Li–S batteries. In the present investigation, MgO-doped and nitrogen-rich carbon nanofibers have been prepared via electrospinning technology under carbonization treatment. Ultrathin ZnO nanolayer is further coated on the surface of the carbon nanofiber by atomic layer deposition and then sulfur is loaded inside the nanofibers to achieve a C–MgO/S@ZnO composite. This composite was used as cathode material in Li–S batteries. They are exhibited maximum rate capabilities of 1066.08 and 846.75 mA h g−1 at 0.5 and 2 C, respectively. Moreover, the discharge capacity is 812.67 mA h g−1 after 100 cycles at 2 C and the capacity decay after 100 cycles is as small as 0.04% per cycle. The excellent electrochemical performance of C–MgO/S@ZnO nanofibers could be ascribed by the rational design due to the structure and composition of sulfur host.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Scheme 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xu R, Belharouak I, Zhang X et al (2014) Insight into sulfur reactions in Li–S batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(24):21938–21945

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Manthiram A, Fu Y, Su YS (2013) Challenges and prospects of lithium–sulfur batteries. Acc Chem Res 46(5):1125–1134

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang J, Cai Y, Wu J, Yao J (2015) Graphene oxide-confined synthesis of Li4Ti5O12 microspheres as high-performance anodes for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 165:422–429

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang J, Cai Y, Zhong Q et al (2015) Porous nitrogen-doped carbon derived from silk fibroin protein encapsulating sulfur as a superior cathode material for high-performance lithiu. Nanoscale 7(42):17791–17797

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Li Y, Cai Y, Cai Z et al (2018) Sulfur-in filtrated yeast-derived nitrogen-rich porous carbon microspheres@reduced graphene cathode for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Electrochim Acta 285:317–325

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang JQ, Huang J, Chong WG et al (2019) Graphene/RuO2 nanocrystal composites as sulfur host for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Energy Chem 35:204–211

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guo J, Xu Y, Wang C (2011) Sulfur-impregnated disordered carbon nanotubes cathode for lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano Lett 11(10):4288–4294

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin T, Tang Y, Wang Y et al (2013) Scotch-tape-like exfoliation of graphite assisted with elemental sulfur and graphene-sulfur composites for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Energy Environ Sci 6(4):1283–1290

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cao J, Chen C, Zhao Q et al (2016) A flexible nanostructured paper of a reduced graphene oxide–sulfur composite for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries with unconventional configurations. Adv Mater 28(43):9629–9636

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang D, Li F, Liu M et al (2008) 3D aperiodic hierarchical porous graphitic carbon material for high-rate electrochemical capacitive energy storage. Angew Chem Int Ed 47(2):373–376

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mao Y, Li G, Guo Y et al (2017) Foldable interpenetrated metal-organic frameworks/carbon nanotubes thin film for lithium–sulfur batteries. Nat Commun 8:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yang W, Yang W, Song A et al (2018) 3D interconnected porous carbon nanosheets/carbon nanotubes as a polysulfide reservoir for high performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Nanoscale 10(2):816–824

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fu Y, Zu C, Manthiram A (2013) In situ-formed Li2S in lithiated graphite electrodes for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Am Chem Soc 135(48):18044–18047

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ye J, He F, Nie J et al (2015) Sulfur/carbon nanocomposite-filled polyacrylonitrile nanofibers as a long life and high capacity cathode for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 3(4):7406–7412

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mi K, Jiang Y, Feng J et al (2016) Hierarchical carbon nanotubes with a thick microporous wall and inner channel as efficient scaffolds for lithium–sulfur Batteries. Adv Funct Mater 26(10):1571–1579

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yuan L, Yuan H, Qiu X et al (2009) Improvement of cycle property of sulfur-coated multi-walled carbon nanotubes composite cathode for lithium/sulfur batteries. J Power Sources 189(2):1141–1146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu J, Qu W, Xie Y et al (2017) Thermal conductivity and annealing effect on structure of lignin-based microscale carbon fibers. Carbon 121:35–47

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liang X, Zhang M, Kaiser MR et al (2015) Split-half-tubular polypyrrole@sulfur@polypyrrole composite with a novel three-layer-3D structure as cathode for lithium/sulfur batteries. Nano Energy 11:587–599

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Xiao L, Cao Y, Xiao J et al (2012) A soft approach to encapsulate sulfur: polyaniline nanotubes for lithium–sulfur batteries with long cycle life. Adv Mater 24(9):1176–1181

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Li Y, Shi B, Liu W et al (2018) Hollow polypyrrole@MnO2 spheres as nano-sulfur hosts for improved lithium–sulfur batteries. Electrochim Acta 260:912–920

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu X, Huang JQ, Zhang Q, Mai L (2017) Nanostructured metal oxides and sulfides for lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Mater 29(20):1601759–1–1601759–25

    Google Scholar 

  22. Choi YJ, Jung BS, Lee DJ et al (2007) Electrochemical properties of sulfur electrode containing nano Al2O3 for lithium/sulfur cell. Phys Scr T129:62–65

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou G, Yin LC, Wang DW et al (2013) Fibrous hybrid of graphene and sulfur nanocrystals for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. ACS Nano 7(6):5367–5375

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Seh ZW, Li W, Cha JJ et al (2013) Sulphur–TiO2 yolk-shell nanoarchitecture with internal void space for long-cycle lithium–sulphur batteries. Nat Commun 4:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  25. An D, Shen L, Lei D et al (2019) An ultrathin and continuous Li4Ti5O12 coated carbon nanofiber interlayer for high rate lithium sulfur battery. J Energy Chem 31:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kong L, Chen X, Li BQ et al (2018) A bifunctional perovskite promoter for polysulfide regulation toward stable lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Mater 30(2):1–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhong M, Yang D, Xie C et al (2016) Yolk–shell MnO@ZnMn2O4/N–C nanorods derived from α-MnO2/ZIF-8 as anode materials for lithium ion Batteries. Small 12(40):5564–5571

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Marichy C, Bechelany M, Pinna N (2012) Atomic layer deposition of nanostructured materials for energy and environmental applications. Adv Mater 24(8):1017–1032

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou T, Jiang Q, Wang L et al (2018) Facile preparation of nitrogen-enriched hierarchical porous carbon nanofibers by Mg(OAc)2-assisted electrospinning for flexible supercapacitors. Appl Surf Sci 456:827–834

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Manthiram A, Fu Y, Chung S-H et al (2014) Rechargeable lithium–sulfur batteries. Chem Rev 114(23):11751–11787

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zheng G, Yang Y, Cha JJ et al (2011) Hollow carbon nanofiber-encapsulated sulfur cathodes for high specific capacity rechargeable lithium batteries. Nano Lett 11(10):4462–4467

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zheng Z, Guo H, Pei F et al (2016) High sulfur loading in hierarchical porous carbon rods constructed by vertically oriented porous graphene-like nanosheets for Li–S batteries. Adv Funct Mater 26(48):8952–8959

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Luo C, Niu S, Zhou G et al (2016) Dual-functional hard template directed one-step formation of a hierarchical porous carbon-carbon nanotube hybrid for lithium–sulfur batteries. Chem Commun 52(82):12143–12146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Xiao Z, Yang Z, Wang L et al (2015) A lightweight TiO2/Graphene interlayer, applied as a highly effective polysulfide absorbent for fast, long-life lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Mater 27(18):2891–2898

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang YB, Yan Y, Xie JC et al (2018) Ionothermal synthesis of graphene-based microporous carbon for lithium–sulfur batteries. New J Chem 42(4):2483–2490

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ma F, Liang J, Wang T et al (2018) Efficient entrapment and catalytic conversion of lithium polysulfides on hollow metal oxide submicro-spheres as lithium–sulfur battery cathodes. Nanoscale 10(12):5634–5641

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Gu X, Tong CJ, Wen B et al (2016) Ball-milling synthesis of ZnO@sulphur/carbon nanotubes and Ni(OH)2@sulphur/carbon nanotubes composites for high-performance lithium–sulphur batteries. Electrochim Acta 196:369–376

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhou J, Qin J, Guo L et al (2016) Scalable synthesis of high-quality transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets and their application as sodium-ion battery anodes. J Mater Chem A 4(44):17370–17380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Guo Y, Wu H, Zhang Y et al (2017) Vesicle-like sulfur/reduced graphene oxide composites for high performance lithium–sulfur batteries. J Alloy Compd 724:1007–1013

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu Y, Guo J, Zhang J et al (2015) Graphene-wrapped sulfur nanospheres with ultra-high sulfur loading for high energy density lithium–sulfur batteries. Appl Surf Sci 324:399–404

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Yu M, Ma J, Song H et al (2016) Atomic layer deposited TiO2 on a nitrogen-doped graphene/sulfur electrode for high performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Energy Environ Sci 9(4):1495–1503

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Yang R, Du H, Lin Z et al (2019) ZnO nanoparticles filled tetrapod-shaped carbon shell for lithium–sulfur batteries. Carbon 141:258–265

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhu C, Kim C, Aoki Y, Habazaki H (2017) Nitrogen-Doped hierarchical porous carbon architecture incorporated with cobalt nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes as efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Adv Mater Interfaces 4(19):1700583–1–1700583–11

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wu J, Hu J, Song K et al (2017) Spirulina-derived nitrogen-doped porous carbon as carbon/S composite cathodes for high cyclability lithium–sulphur batteries. J Alloys Compd 704:1–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Xiang M, Wu H, Liu H et al (2017) A flexible 3D multifunctional MgO-decorated carbon foam@CNTs hybrid as self-supported cathode for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Funct Mater 27(37):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  46. Maffeis TGG, Penny MW, Castaing A et al (2012) XPS investigation of vacuum annealed vertically aligned ultralong ZnO nanowires. Surf Sci 606(1–2):99–103

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Wu J, Li S, Yang P et al (2019) S@TiO2 nanospheres loaded on PPy matrix for enhanced lithium–sulfur batteries. J Alloys Compd 783:279–285

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Liang X, Hart C, Pang Q et al (2015) A highly efficient polysulfide mediator for lithium–sulfur batteries. Nat Commun 6:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wei H, Rodriguez EF, Best AS et al (2017) Chemical bonding and physical trapping of sulfur in mesoporous magnéli Ti4O7 microspheres for high-performance Li–S battery. Adv Energy Mater 7(4):1601616–1–1601616–10

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zhao T, Ye Y, Peng X et al (2016) Advanced lithium–sulfur batteries enabled by a bio-inspired polysulfide adsorptive brush. Adv Funct Mater 26(46):8418–8426

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work was financially supported by Zhejiang Science and Technology Innovation Activity Plan (Newmiao Talents Program) for College Students (2018R406066) and the Fundamental Research Funds of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University (2019Y006). The authors like to thank Dr. Jegatheeswaran Sonamuthu and Ms. Hongmei Li for their worthy suggestions about this research investigations and manuscript writing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Key Laboratory of Advanced Textile Materials and Manufacturing Technology of Ministry of Education, National Engineering Lab for Textile Fiber Materials and Processing Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, 310018, China

    Danyang Ma, Renxia Zhu, Feixia Ruan, Jegatheeswaran Sonamuthu, Qian Zhang, Mengtao Sun & Yurong Cai

  2. Province of HuBei Anlu Public Inspection and Testing Center, Xiaogan, 432600, China

    Hongmei Li

Authors
  1. Danyang Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Renxia Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Feixia Ruan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jegatheeswaran Sonamuthu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qian Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mengtao Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hongmei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yurong Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yurong Cai.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 593 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, D., Zhu, R., Ruan, F. et al. Rational design of hierarchical C–MgO@ZnO nanofiber as sulfur host for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Sci 55, 5534–5544 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04390-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04390-3

Search

Navigation