Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of coatings on thermal conductivity and tribological properties of aluminum foam/polyoxymethylene interpenetrating composites

  • Composites & nanocomposites
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to solve the problem of interface bonding in aluminum foam (AF)/polyoxymethylene (POM) interpenetrating phase composites (AF/POM). Silane coupling agent (KH-550), graphene oxide (GO), sulfonated graphene (S-GNS) and graphene (GS) coatings were prepared on the surface of AF, respectively, as an interfacial transition layer. The molten modified POM(POMC) was injected into the hole of coated AF by injection molding to prepare different kinds of coated AF/POMC. Thermal conductivity, friction coefficient and wear loss of coated AF/POMC were analyzed, and the wear mechanisms were discussed in detail based on evidences from SEM. The effect of coatings on thermal conductivity of coated AF/POMC was also verified by ANSYS. The investigation has shown that four kinds of coating are successfully covered on the surface of AF, respectively, and the morphology of S-GNS coating is the smoothest. The thermal conductivity of coated AF/POMC is higher than that of AF/POMC. The thermal conductivity of S-GNS-AF/POMC reaches the highest value of 2.25 W m−1 K−1, because S-GNS coating plays a role in reducing the thermal resistance of the interface between AF and POMC phases. The friction coefficient and wear loss of coated AF/POMC are also lower than that of AF/POMC. Three types of graphene coating(S-GNS,GO,GS) as an interface transition layer between AF and POMC phases can homogenize friction, accelerate heat transfer and reduce the friction coefficient and wear loss of composites. Through ANSYS thermal steady-state simulation, S-GNS-AF/POMC has the maximum number of heat flow paths and the highest heat flux compared with other materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xiong XS, Hua L, Wan XJ, Yang C, Xie CY, He D (2018) Experiment and simulation of friction coefficient of polyoxymethylene. Ind Lubr Tribol 70:273–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shi J, Jing B, Zou X (2009) Investigation on thermo-stabilization effect and nonisothermal degradation kinetics of the new compound additives on polyoxymethylene. J Mater Sci 44:1251–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kawaguchi K, Mizuguchi K, Suzuki K (2010) Mechanical and physical characteristics of cellulose-fiber-filled polyacetal composites. J Appl Polym Sci 118:1910–1920

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen S, Li J, Wei L (2018) Comparative effects of rocket-grade hydrogen peroxide solution on POM and UHMWPE: aging behaviors and tribological properties. Colloid Polym Sci 296:1087–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao XW, Ye L (2010) Preparation, structure, and property of polyoxymethylene/carbon nanotubes thermal conducive composites. J Polym Sci Polym Phys 48:905–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. He J, Zhang L, Li C (2010) Thermal conductivity and tribological properties of POM-Cu composites. Polym Eng Sci 50:2153–2159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dong PR, Long CG, Liu SJ (2018) Thermal conductivity and tribological properties of POM composites filled with sulfonated graphene and nano alumina. Surf Tech 47:116–122

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang DQ, Sun CX (2008) Simulation of aluminum foam formation and distribution uniformity. J Mater Sci 43:2825–2832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu J, Binner J, Higginson R (2012) Dry sliding wear behaviour of co-continuous ceramic foam/aluminium alloy interpenetrating composites produced by pressureless infiltration. Wear 276:94–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Su Y, Long CG, Zhou Y (2013) New aluminum foam/polyformaldehyde interpenetrating phase composites prepared by injection molding. Adv Mater Res 5:631–632

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guo FY, Long CG, Zhang J, Zhang Z (2015) Adsorption and dissociation of H2O on Al(111) surface by density functional theory calculation. Appl Surf Sci 324:584–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang Z, Long CG, Yin Y (2014) Study on heat transfer performance of POM/Aluminum alloy interpenetrating phase composites. J Funct Mater 45:23029–23032

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kashfipour MA, Mehra N, Zhu J (2018) A review on the role of interface in mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties of polymer composites. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 1:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ding R, Li W, Wang X (2018) A brief review of corrosion protective films and coatings based on graphene and graphene oxide. J Alloy Compd 764:1039–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Raza MA, Ali A, Ghauri FA, Aslam A, Yaqoob K, Wasay A, Raffi M (2017) Electrochemical behavior of graphene coatings deposited on copper metal by electrophoretic deposition and chemical vapor deposition. Surf Coat Tech 332:112–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Qiu JW, Li JS, Yuan ZS, Zeng HX (2018) Surface modification of carbon fibres for interface improvement in textile composites. Appl Compos Mater 25:853–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar A, Sharma K, Dixit AR (2019) A review of the mechanical and thermal properties of graphene and its hybrid polymer nanocomposites for structural applications. J Mater Sci 64:5992–6026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Si Y, Samulsk ET (2008) Synthesis of water soluble graphene. Nano Lett 8:1679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi Y, Cheng G, Zhang Z (2016) Preparation and properties of anti-corrosion film on surface of aluminum alloy. Rare Metal Mat Eng 45:952–956

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang HY, Wu RM, Guo C (2012) The adherence between a superhydrophobic coating and the surface of aluminum alloy. Adv Mater Res 583:350–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shen Y, Chen B (2015) Sulfonated graphene nanosheets as a superb adsorbent for various environmental pollutants in water. Environ Sci Tech 49:7364–7372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen LY, Yang B, Liu LH (2016) Synthesis of sulfonated graphene oxide catalyst and its catalytic activity. Guangzhou Cheml Ind 44:110–113

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ehsani A, Kowsari E, Boorboor FA (2017) Sulfonated graphene oxide and its nanocomposites with electroactive conjugated polymer as effective pseudocapacitor electrode materials. J Colloid Interf ace Sci 497:258–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang W, Ouyang X, Lee LJ (2012) High-performance nanopapers based on benzenesulfonic functionalized graphenes. ACS Nano 6:10178–10185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mishra D, Sonia FJ, Srivastava D (2018) Wear damage and effects of graphene-based lubricants/coatings during linear reciprocating sliding wear at high contact pressure. Wear 400:144–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Long CG, Shen C, Cao TS (2014) Mechanical and tribological properties of MC nylon composites reinforced by graphene. J Changsha Univ Sci Tech 2:92–97

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fu XL, Wang Y, Pan YZ, Wang XY (2017) Friction-reducing, anti-wear and self-repairing properties of sulfonated graphene. J Wuhan Univ Tech 32:277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sun LH, Yang ZG, Li XH (2008) Study on the friction and wear behavior of POM/Al2O3 nanocomposites. Wear 264:693–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xiong XS, Shen SZ, Alam N, Lin H, Li X, Wan XJ, Miao MH (2018) Mechanical and abrasive wear performance of woven flax fabric/polyoxymethylene composites. Wear 414:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mergler YJ, Schaake RP, Huisin’t VAJ (2004) Material transfer of POM in sliding contact. Wear 256:294–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mai YJ, Zhou MP, Ling HJ, Chen FX, Lian WQ, Jie XH (2018) Surfactant-free electrodeposition of reduced graphene oxide/copper composite coatings with enhanced wear resistance. Appl Surf Sci 433:232–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Deng C, Jiang J, Liu F, Fang LC, Wang JB, Li DJ, Wu JJ (2015) Effects of electrophoretically deposited graphene oxide coatings on interfacial properties of carbon fiber composite. J Mater Sci 50:5886–5892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Naghdi S, Jaleh B, Shahbazi N (2016) Reversible wettability conversion of electrodeposited graphene oxide/titania nanocomposite coating: investigation of surface structures. Appl Surf Sci 368:409–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang CH, Hu F, Yang K, Hu TH (2016) Preparation and properties of nylon 6/sulfonated graphene composites by in situ polymerization process. Rsc Adv 51:45014–45022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shahil Khan MF, Balandin Alexander A (2012) Thermal properties of graphene and multilayer graphene: applications in thermal interface materials. Solid State Commun 152:1331–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support by the Key Scientific Research Foundation of Education Department of Hunan Province is acknowledged.

Funding

This study was funded by the Key Scientific Research Foundation of Education Department of Hunan Province (No. 14A011), and the Key International and Regional Scientific and Technological Cooperation Project of Hunan Province (2014WK2035).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunguang Long.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dong, P., Long, C., Peng, Y. et al. Effect of coatings on thermal conductivity and tribological properties of aluminum foam/polyoxymethylene interpenetrating composites. J Mater Sci 54, 13135–13146 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03826-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03826-9

Navigation