Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 11, pp 8602–8612 | Cite as

Melt spinning of nano-hydroxyapatite and polycaprolactone composite fibers for bone scaffold application

  • Wen Xue
  • Peifeng Chen
  • Fujun WangEmail author
  • Lu WangEmail author
Materials for life sciences


Textile technology shows great advantages in tissue engineering applications and it is a promising candidate for bone scaffolds fabrication. Composite fibers made from nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA) particles and polycaprolactone (PCL) were prepared by the melt spinning technology. nHA particles with different concentrations (1, 3, 5 and 7 wt%) were loaded into PCL fibers, and their influence on fiber morphological, thermal, mechanical and biological performance was evaluated. Results indicated that nHA particles were homogeneously distributed in PCL fibers. And nHA loading improved the break stress and initial modulus of pure PCL fibers, as well as thermal stability, which was confirmed by thermogravimetric analysis. Mineral deposition was also observed on fibers with nHA loading, which was favorable to bone scaffolds. Tubular meshes made by weft knitting proved the manufacturability of nHA/PCL composite fibers for further scaffold applications.



The project is support by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Nos. 2232017A-05, 2232018G-01), the Science and Technology Support Program of Shanghai (Grant No. 16441903803), the Chinese Universities Scientific Fund (Grant No. CUSF-DH-D-2017012), the National Health and Family Planning Commission Fund (No. 2017ZX01001-S22) and the 111 project (Grant No. B07024).

Author's contributions

PC, FW and LW conceived and designed the experiments. WX and PC performed the experiments including fabrication and analysis. WX wrote the paper.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Shin H, Jo S, Mikos AG (2003) Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 24(24):4353–4364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ma PX (2004) Scaffolds for tissue fabrication. Mater Today 7(5):30–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Global orthopedic industry investment research report of 2017.
  4. 4.
    Catledge SA et al (2004) Mesenchymal stem cell adhesion and spreading on nanostructured biomaterials. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 4(8):986–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu X, Ma PX (2004) Polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng 32(3):477–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Persson M et al (2013) Melt spinning of poly(lactic acid) and hydroxyapatite composite fibers: influence of the filler content on the fiber properties. Appl Mater Interfaces 5(15):6864–6872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim HW, Lee HH, Knowles JC (2006) Electrospinning biomedical nanocomposite fibers of hydroxyapatite/poly(lactic acid) for bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 79A(3):643–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim HW, Knowles JC, Kim HE (2004) Effect of biphasic calcium phosphates on drug release and biological and mechanical properties of poly(ϵ-caprolactone) composite membranes. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 70(3):467–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ma PX, Langer R (1999) Fabrication of biodegradable polymer foams for cell transplantation and tissue engineering. Methods Mol Med 18:47–56Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mikos AG (1994) Preparation and characterization of poly (L-lactic acid) foam. Polymer 35:1068–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cooper AI (2000) Polymer synthesis and processing using supercritical carbon dioxide. J Mater Chem 10(2):207–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harris LD, Kim BS, Mooney DJ (1998) Open pore biodegradable matrices formed with gas foaming. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 42(3):396–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roether JA et al (2002) Novel bioresorbable and bioactive composites based on bioactive glass and polylactide foams for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med 13(12):1207–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deville S, Saiz E, Tomsia AP (2006) Freeze casting of hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27(32):5480–5489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhou C et al (2013) Electrospun bio-nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering by cellulose nanocrystals reinforcing maleic anhydride grafted PLA. Appl Mater Interfaces 5(9):3847–3854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maquet V et al (2004) Porous poly(-hydroxyacid)/bioglass composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. I: preparation and in vitro characterisation. Biomaterials 25(18):4185–4194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li L et al (2012) Electrospun fibrous scaffold of hydroxyapatite/poly (ε-caprolactone) for bone regeneration. J Mater Sci Mater Med 23(2):547–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moutos FT, Freed LE, Guilak F (2007) A biomimetic three-dimensional woven composite scaffold for functional tissue engineering of cartilage. Nat Mater 6(2):162–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Correlo VM et al (2005) Hydroxyapatite reinforced chitosan and polyester blends for biomedical applications. Macromol Mater Eng 290(12):1157–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garlotta D (2001) A literature review of poly(lactic acid). J Polym Environ 9(2):63–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fan Z et al (2017) A new approach to improve the local compressive properties of PPDO self-expandable stent. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 68:318–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Madurantakam PA et al (2009) Multiple factor interactions in biomimetic mineralization of electrospun scaffolds. Biomaterials 30(29):5456–5464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Raucci MG et al (2010) Biomineralized porous composite scaffolds prepared by chemical synthesis for bone tissue regeneration. Acta Biomater 6(10):4090–4099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fabbri P et al (2010) Porous scaffolds of polycaprolactone reinforced with in situ generated hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med 21(1):343–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang Y, Liu L, Guo S (2010) Characterization of biodegradable and cytocompatible nano-hydroxyapatite/polycaprolactone porous scaffolds in degradation in vitro. Polym Degrad Stab 95(2):207–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hassan MI, Sultana N (2017) Characterization, drug loading and antibacterial activity of nanohydroxyapatite/polycaprolactone (nHA/PCL) electrospun membrane. Biotech 7(4):249–258Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rezaei A, Mohammadi MR (2013) In vitro study of hydroxyapatite/polycaprolactone (HA/PCL) nanocomposite synthesized by an in situ sol–gel process. Mater Sci Eng C 33(1):390–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ghorbani FM et al (2016) Effect of hydroxyapatite nano-particles on morphology, rheology and thermal behavior of poly(caprolactone)/chitosan blends. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 59:980–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Metzler R, Nonnenmacher TF (2003) Fractional relaxation processes and fractional rheological models for the description of a class of viscoelastic materials. Int J Plast 19(7):941–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chen J, Chu B, Hsiao BS (2006) Mineralization of hydroxyapatite in electrospun nanofibrous poly(L-lactic acid) scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 79A(2):307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cho SB et al (1995) Dependence of apatite formation on silica gel on its structure: effect of heat treatment. J Am Ceram Soc 78(7):1769–1774CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of TextilesDonghua UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Textile Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, College of TextilesDonghua UniversitySongjiang District, ShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations