Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 3125–3134 | Cite as

Adhesion of reactive silver inks on indium tin oxide

  • Avinash Mamidanna
  • April Jeffries
  • Mariana Bertoni
  • Owen HildrethEmail author
Electronic materials

Abstract

Many emerging photovoltaic technologies, such as silicon heterojunction (SHJ) cells and perovskites, are temperature sensitive and are not compatible with the high sintering temperatures required for commercial screen-printed metallization pastes. Newer, low-temperature reactive silver inks exhibit good electrical conductivity and are compatible with temperature-sensitive substrates. However, preliminary investigations showed that the adhesion and reliability of these metallizations could vary dramatically with ink composition. This work evaluates the adhesion performance of printed reactive inks on indium tin oxide-coated SHJ cells to show that puckering phenomena originating from the porous nature of the printed reactive inks are responsible for lowering the as-printed adhesion strength. Adhesion performance was qualitatively determined using 180° peel test followed by optical imaging to quantify the amount of adhesive failure. Post-print scanning electron microscopy was used to observe the surface morphology. Diluting the reactive ink to reduce silver ion concentration decreased the observed puckering phenomenon and improved adhesion performance. This new understanding enables a more systematic design of reactive inks for novel photovoltaic applications.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under contract agreement IIP-1602135 and CMMI-1635548. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Science Foundation.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10853_2018_3017_MOESM1_ESM.docx (29.5 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 30250 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Teng KF, Vest RW (2004) Application of ink jet technology on photovoltaic metallization. IEEE Electron Device Lett 9:1–2Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ebong A, Chen N (2015) Metallization of crystalline silicon solar cells: a review. In: 2012 9th International conference on high capacity optical networks and enabling technologies (HONET). IEEE, pp 102–109Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hermans JP, Papet P, Oacheco K, et al. (2014) Advanced metallization concepts by inkjetprinting. pp 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.4229/eupvsec20142014-2co.2.3
  4. 4.
    Shaheen SE, Radspinner R, Peyghambarian N, Jabbour GE (2001) Fabrication of bulk heterojunction plastic solar cells by screen printing. Appl Phys Lett 79:2996–2998.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1413501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Teng KF, Vest RW (2004) Metallization of solar cells with ink jet printing and silver metallo-organic inks. IEEE Trans Compon Hybrids Manuf Technol 11:1–7Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li ZG, Liang L, Ionkin AS et al (2011) Microstructural comparison of silicon solar cells’ front-side Ag contact and the evolution of current conduction mechanisms. J Appl Phys 110:074304–074309.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3642956 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li ZG, Liang L, Cheng LK (2009) Electron microscopy study of front-side Ag contact in crystalline Si solar cells. J Appl Phys 105:066102–066104.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3086663 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rane SB, Khanna PK, Seth T et al (2003) Firing and processing effects on microstructure of fritted silver thick film electrode materials for solar cells. Mater Chem Phys 82:237–245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(03)00236-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Wolf S, Descoeudres A, Holman ZC, Ballif C (2012) High-efficiency silicon heterojunction solar cells—a review. Green 2:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1515/green-2011-0018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jeffries AM, Mamidanna A, Ding L, Hildreth O, Bertoni MI (2016) Low-temperature drop-on-demand reactive silver inks for solar cell front-grid metallization. IEEE J Photovolt 7:37–43.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.2621351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paretkar D, Glassmaker NJ, Mikeska KR, Blackman G, Jagota A (2016) Adhesion of screen-printed silver metallization to crystalline silicon solar cells. IEEE J Photovolt 6:1141–1151.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.2583792 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ndiaye A, Charki A, Kobi A et al (2013) Degradations of silicon photovoltaic modules: a literature review. Sol Energy 96:140–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Walker SB, Lewis JA (2012) Reactive silver inks for patterning high-conductivity features at mild temperatures. J Am Chem Soc 134:1419–1421.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja209267c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lefky C, Mamidanna A, Huang Y, Hildreth O (2016) Impact of solvent selection and temperature on porosity and resistance of printed self-reducing silver inks. Phys Status Solidi A 213:2751–2758.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.201600150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Talbot EL, Berson A, Brown PS, Bain CD (2012) Evaporation of picoliter droplets on surfaces with a range of wettabilities and thermal conductivities. Phys Rev E 85:061604–061606.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.85.061604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringColorado School of MinesGoldenUSA
  2. 2.School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and EnergyArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  3. 3.School of Electrical, Computer and Energy EngineeringArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations