Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 18, pp 13230–13242 | Cite as

Polymer composites with balanced dielectric constant and loss via constructing trilayer architecture

  • Chao Zhang
  • Zhicheng Shi
  • Fan Mao
  • Chaoqiang Yang
  • Jie Yang
  • Xiaotong Zhu
  • Heng Zuo
Polymers

Abstract

Polymers with high dielectric constants are widely used in electronic devices and electric systems. However, polymers exhibit low dielectric constants, which greatly limit their applications. Currently, ferroelectric ceramic fillers and conductive filler are commonly filled into polymer matrix to achieve enhanced dielectric constants. Unfortunately, even though the loading fraction of ferroelectric ceramic fillers exceeds 50 vol%, the enhancement of dielectric constant is still limited. On the contrary, although ultrahigh dielectric constant could be realized in conductor/polymer composites containing small loading fractions of conductive fillers, the loss is usually very high owing to severe leakage conduction. To overcome the shortcomings of the above-mentioned two types of high dielectric composites, this work combined them together and designed a series of trilayer polymer composites consisting of one carbon nanotube/polyimide composite layer sandwiched by two BaTiO3/polyimide composite layers. Fortunately, the trilayer architecture could effectively overcome the drawbacks of carbon nanotube/polyimide and BaTiO3/polyimide single-layer composites, hence the balanced dielectric constant and loss. When the BT content of the outer layer is 50 wt% and the carbon nanotube content of the middle layer is 4 wt%, the trilayer film possesses a high dielectric constant of ~ 35 @10 kHz, which is about 700% over pristine PI matrix (ε′ ≈ 5 @10 kHz). Meanwhile, the loss tangent of the trilayer composite (tanδ ≈ 0.03 @10 kHz) is still comparative to pristine PI (tanδ ≈ 0.01 @10 kHz).

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51773187, 51402271), Foundation for Outstanding Young Scientist in Shandong Province (BS2014CL003).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10853_2018_2545_MOESM1_ESM.docx (402 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 401 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Shi ZC, Chen SG, Fan RH, Wang XA, Wang X, Zhang ZD, Sun K (2014) Ultra low percolation threshold and significantly enhanced permittivity in porous metal–ceramic composites. J Mater Chem C 2:6752–6757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang Z, Wang T, Wang C, Xiao YJ (2017) The effect of interfacial interaction-induced soft percolation regime on dielectric properties in Ba(Fe0.5Nb0.5)O3/P(VDF-TrFE) nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 52:11496–11505.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1290-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pan ZB, Liu BH, Zhai JW, Yao LM, Yang K, Shen B (2017) NaNbO3 two-dimensional platelets induced highly energy storage density in trilayer architecture composites. Nano Energy 40:587–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chi QG, Ma T, Zhang Y, Cui Y, Zhang CH, Lin JQ, Wang X, Lei QQ (2017) Significantly enhanced energy storage density for poly(vinylidene fluoride) composites by induced PDA-coated 0.5Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3–0.5(Ba0.7Ca0.3)TiO3 nanofibers. J Mater Chem A 5:16757–16766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pan ZB, Yao ML, Zhai JW, Yao X, Chen H (2018) Interfacial coupling effect in organic/inorganic nanocomposites with high energy density. Adv Mater 30:1705662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Inui T, Koga H, Nogi M, Komoda H, Suganuma K (2015) A miniaturized flexible antenna printed on a high dielectric constant nanopaper composite. Adv Mater 27:1112–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bartlett MD, Fassler A, Kazem N, Markvicka EJ, Mandal P, Majidi C (2016) Stretchable, high-k dielectric elastomers through liquid-metal inclusions. Adv Mater 28:3726–3731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choi TY, Hwang BU, Kim BY, Trung TQ, Nam YH, Kim DN, Eom K, Lee NE (2017) Stretchable, transparent, and stretch-unresponsive capacitive touch sensor array with selectively patterned silver nanowires/reduced graphene oxide electrodes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:18022–18030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang K, Li GH, Feng LM et al (2017) Ultralow percolation threshold and enhanced electromagnetic interference shielding in poly(l-lactide)/multi-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposites with electrically conductive segregated networks. J Mater Chem C 5:9359–9369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sun K, Fan RH, Zhang XH et al (2018) An overview of metamaterials and their achievements in wireless power transfer. J Mater Chem C 6:2925–2943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu NN, Qiao J, Liu JR, Du WJ, Xu DM, Liu W (2018) Strengthened electromagnetic absorption performance derived from synergistic effect of carbon nanotube hybrid with Co@C beads. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 1:149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Song B, Wang TT, Sun HG et al (2017) Two-step hydrothermally synthesized carbon nanodots/WO3 photocatalysts with enhanced photocatalytic performance. Dalton Trans 46:15769–15777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guo YQ, Xu GJ, Yang XT et al (2018) Significantly enhanced and precisely modeled thermal conductivity in polyimide nanocomposites with chemically modified graphene via in situ polymerization and electrospinning-hot press technology. J Mater Chem C 6:3004–3015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guo J, Song HX, Liu H et al (2017) Polypyrrole-interface-functionalized nano-magnetite epoxy nanocomposites as electromagnetic wave absorbers with enhanced flame retardancy. J Mater Chem C 5:5334–5344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guan XY, Zheng GQ, Dai K, Liu CT, Yan XR, Shen CY, Guo ZH (2016) Carbon nanotubes-adsorbed electrospun PA66 nanofiber bundles with improved conductivity and robust flexibility. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:14150–14159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gu HB, Zhang HY, Ma C et al (2017) Polyaniline assisted uniform dispersion for magnetic ultrafine barium ferrite nanorods reinforced epoxy metacomposites with tailorable negative permittivity. J Phys Chem C 121:13265–13273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang L, Qin MK, Yu W et al (2017) Heterostructured TiO2/WO3 nanocomposites for photocatalytic degradation of toluene under visible light. J Electrochem Soc 164:H1086–H1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang L, Yu W, Han C et al (2017) Large scaled synthesis of heterostructured electrospun TiO2/SnO2 nanofibers with an enhanced photocatalytic activity. J Electrochem Soc 164:H651–H656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang C, Mo BM, He ZF et al (2018) Hydroxide ions transportation in polynorbornene anion exchange membrane. Polymer 138:363–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hu Z, Shao Q, Huang YD et al (2018) Light triggered interfacial damage self-healing of poly(p-phenylene benzobisoxazole) fiber composites. Nanotechnology 29:185602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cheng XQ, Wang ZX, Jiang X, Li TX, Lau CH, Guo ZH, Ma J, Shao L (2018) Towards sustainable ultrafast molecular–separation membranes: from conventional polymers to emerging materials. Prog Mater Sci 92:258–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sun ZY, Zhang L, Dang F et al (2017) Experimental and simulation-based understanding of morphology controlled barium titanate nanoparticles under co-adsorption of surfactants. CrystEngComm 19:3288–3298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wu JG, Xiao DQ, Zhu JG (2015) Potassium–sodium niobate lead-free piezoelectric materials: past, present, and future of phase boundaries. Chem Rev 115:2559–2595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang TD, Li WL, Zhao Y, Yu Y, Fei WD (2018) High energy storage performance of opposite double-heterojunction ferroelectricity-insulators. Adv Funct Mater 28:1706211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chi QG, Ma T, Zhang Y et al (2018) Excellent energy storage of sandwich-structured PVDF-based composite at low electric field by introduction of the hybrid CoFe2O4@BZT-BCT nanofibersg. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:403–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu SH, Zhai JW (2015) Improving the dielectric constant and energy density of poly(vinylidene fluoride) composites induced by surface-modified SrTiO3 nanofibers by polyvinylpyrrolidone. J Mater Chem A 3:1511–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang N, Xu C, Hou J et al (2016) Preparation and properties of thermally conductive polyimide/boron nitride composites. RSC Adv 6:18279–18287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chi QG, Dong JF, Zhang CH, Wong CP, Wang X, Lei QQ (2016) Nano iron oxide-deposited calcium copper titanate/polyimide hybrid films induced by an external magnetic field: toward a high dielectric constant and suppressed loss. J Mater Chem C 4:8179–8188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shi ZC, Fan RH, Zhang ZD et al (2012) Random composites of nickel networks supported by porous alumina toward double negative materials. Adv Mater 24:2349–2352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cheng CB, Fan RH, Wang ZY et al (2017) Tunable and weakly negative permittivity in carbon/silicon nitride composites with different carbonizing temperatures. Carbon 125:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xu X, Zhang H, Lou H, Ma C, Li Y, Guo Z, Gu H (2018) Chitosan-coated-magnetite with covalently grafted polystyrene based carbon nanocomposites for hexavalent chromium adsorption. Eng Sci 1:46–54.  https://doi.org/10.30919/espub.es.180308 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sun YG, Tang J, Qin FX, Yuan JS, Zhang K, Li J, Zhu DM, Qin LC (2017) Hybrid lithium-ion capacitors with asymmetric graphene electrodes. J Mater Chem A 5:13601–13609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sun K, Xie PT, Wang ZY et al (2017) Flexible polydimethylsiloxane/multi-walled carbon nanotubes membranous metacomposites with negative permittivity. Polymer 125:50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shi ZC, Wang J, Mao F, Yang C, Zhang C, Fan RH (2017) Significantly improved dielectric performances of sandwich-structured polymer composites induced by alternating positive-k and negative-k layers. J Mater Chem A 5:14575–14582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yoon HW, Bok C, Park NK (2017) Enhanced dielectric properties of polyimide/BaTiO3 nanocomposite by embedding the polypyrrole@polyimide core-shell nanoparticles. Macromol Res 25:290–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Xu WH, Ding YC, Jiang SH, Ye W, Liao XJ, Hou HQ (2016) High permittivity nanocomposites fabricated from electrospun polyimide/BaTiO3 hybrid nanofibers. Polym Compo 37:795–801Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dang ZM, Zhou T, Yao SH et al (2009) Advanced calcium copper titanate/polyimide functional hybrid films with high dielectric permittivity. Adv Mater 21:2077–2082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Huang Y, Huang X, Schadler LS, He J, Jiang P (2016) Core@double-shell structured nanocomposites: a route to high dielectric constant and low loss material. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:25496–25507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Feng Y, Li WL, Hou YF, Yu Y, Cao WP, Zhang TD, Fei WD (2015) Enhanced dielectric properties of PVDF-HFP/BaTiO3-nanowire composites induced by interfacial polarization and wire-shape. J Mater Chem C 3:1250–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Liao XJ, Ye W, Chen LL, Jiang SH, Wang G, Zhang L, Hou HQ (2017) Flexible hdC-G reinforced polyimide composites with high dielectric permittivity. Compos Part A 101:50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Xu WH, Ding YC, Jiang SH, Zhu J, Ye W, Shen YL, Hou HQ (2014) Mechanical flexible PI/MWCNTs nanocomposites with high dielectric permittivity by electrospinning. Eur Polym J 59:129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhang L, Liu Z, Lu X, Yang G, Zhang XY, Cheng ZY (2016) Nano-clip based composites with a low percolation threshold and high dielectric constant. Nano Energy 26:550–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chi QG, Gao ZY, Zhang CH, Cui Y, Dong JF, Wang X, Lei QQ (2017) Dielectric properties of sandwich-structured BaTiO3/polyimide hybrid flms. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 28:15142–15148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chen YQ, Lin BP, Zhang XQ, Wang JC, Lai CW, Sun Y, Liu YR, Yang H (2014) Enhanced dielectric properties of amino-modified CNT/polyimide composite films with a sandwich structure. J Mater Chem A 2:14118–14126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wu HP, Yang Q, Meng QH, Ahmad A, Zhang M, Zhu LY, Liu YG, Wei ZX (2016) A polyimide derivative containing different carbonyl groups for flexible lithium ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 4:2115–2121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lin L, Ye P, Cao C, Jin Q, Xu GS, Shen YH, Yuan YP (2015) Rapid microwave-assisted green production of a crystalline polyimide for enhanced visible-light-induced photocatalytic hydrogen production. J Mater Chem A 3:10205–10208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Maji P, Choudhary RB, Majhi M (2017) Structural, electrical and optical properties of silane-modified ZnO reinforced PMMA matrix and its catalytic activities. J Non-Cryst Solids 456:40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Duduta M, Wood RJ, Clarke DR (2016) Multilayer dielectric elastomers for fast, programmable actuation without prestretch. Adv Mater 28:8058–8063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kong L, Yin XW, Han MK et al (2017) Macroscopic bioinspired graphene sponge modified with in situ grown carbon nanowires and its electromagnetic properties. Carbon 111:94–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Baer E, Zhu L (2017) 50th anniversary perspective: dielectric phenomena in polymers and multilayered dielectric films. Macromolecules 50:2239–2256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sun D, Yin JH, Liu YY, Liu XX (2016) The electrical and thermal properties of polyimide/boron nitride nanocomposite films. J Polym Res 23:254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Feng H, Fang XL, Liu XY, Pei QB, Cui ZK, Deng SF, Gu JL, Zhuang QX (2018) Reduced polyaniline decorated reduced graphene oxide/polyimide nanocomposite films with enhanced dielectric properties and thermostability. Compos Part A 109:578–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sun WD, Lu XJ, Jiang JY et al (2017) Dielectric and energy storage performances of polyimide/BaTiO3 nanocomposites at elevated temperatures. J Appl Phys 121:244101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sun YY, Wang JL, Qi SL, Tian GF, Wu DZ (2015) Permittivity transition from highly positive to negative: polyimide/carbon nanotube composite’s dielectric behavior around percolation threshold. Appl Phys Lett 107:012905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Akhter T, Mun SC, Saeed S, Park OO, Siddiqi HM (2015) Enhancing the dielectric properties of highly compatible new polyimide/γ-ray irradiated MWCNT nanocomposites. RSC Adv 5:71183–71189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Chi QG, Gao ZY, Zhang CH, Cui Y, Dong JF, Wang X, Lei QQ (2017) Dielectric properties of sandwich-structured BaTiO3/polyimide hybrid flms. J Mater Sci 28:15142–15148.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-7390-8 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringOcean University of ChinaQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations