Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 18, pp 12807–12815 | Cite as

Effect of graphite structures on the productivity and quality of few-layer graphene in liquid-phase exfoliation

  • Fumiya Mori
  • Masatoshi Kubouchi
  • Yoshihiko AraoEmail author
Chemical routes to materials

Abstract

Liquid-phase exfoliation (LPE) is a promising technique for commercializing graphene production because of its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. However, the low yield of graphene in laboratory-scale production, less than 10 g/h, necessitates modifications to the process for it to be feasible for commercial applications. Natural graphite has various size distribution, crystallite sizes, and interlayer space, making the choice of initial graphite very important. Five types of natural graphite with different structures were prepared for the experiment. The structural parameters of graphite such as crystallite size and d-spacing were precisely determined based on a standard procedure of X-ray diffraction measurements for carbon materials. The effects of graphite flake size and crystallite size on the productivity and quality of few-layer graphene (FLG) were investigated. The results showed that small graphite was easier to fragment and exfoliate. FLG productivity improvement up to 1500% was attained when graphite with smaller flakes was used instead of graphite with large flakes. The crystallite size of graphite was manipulated by plenary ball milling, and the effect of crystallite on FLG productivity in LPE process was also discussed.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 15H05504 and the Fujikura Foundation. The authors acknowledge the Center for Advanced Materials Analysis in Tokyo Institute of Technology for the XRD and Raman analysis. We wish to acknowledge Jonathon Tanks for his help in English editing.

Supplementary material

10853_2018_2538_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.6 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1660 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Kelly AG, Hallam T, Backes C, Harvey A, Coleman JN et al (2017) All-printed thin-film transistors from networks of liquid-exfoliated nanosheets. Science 356:69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonaccorso F, Colombo L, Yu G, Stoller M, Tozzini V et al (2015) Graphene, related two-dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems for energy conversion and storage. Science 347(6217):1246501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boland CS, Khan U, Ryan G, Barwich S, Charifou R et al (2016) Sensitive electromechanical sensors using viscoelastic graphene-polymer nanocomposites. Science 354:1257–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu Z, Parvez K, Li R, Dong R, Feng X et al (2015) Transparent conductive electrodes from graphene/PEDOT:PSS hybrid inks for ultrathin organic photodetectors. Adv Mater 27:66–675Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Young RJ, Kinloch IA, Gong L, Novoselov KS (2012) The mechanics of graphene nanocomposites: a review. Compos Sci Technol 72:1459–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Piner RS, Kohlhaas KA, Kleinhammes A et al (2007) Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 45:1558–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parvez K, Wu ZS, Li R, Liu X, Graf R et al (2014) Exfoliation of graphite into graphene in aqueous solutions of inorganic salts. J Am Chem Soc 136:6083–6091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pénicaud A, Drummond C (2013) Deconstructing graphite: graphenide solutions. Acc Chem Res 46:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hernandez Y, Nicolosi V, Lotya M, Blighe FM, Sun Z, De S et al (2008) High-yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite. Nat Nanotechnol 3:563–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Halim U, Zheng CR, Chen Y, Lin Z, Jiang S et al (2013) A rational design of cosolvent exfoliation of layered materials by directly probing liquid–solid interaction. Nat Commun 4:2213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shen J, He Y, Wu J, Gao C, Keyshar K et al (2015) Liquid phase exfoliation of two-dimensional materials by directly probing and matching surface tension components. Nano Lett 15:5449–5454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shen J, Wu J, Wang M, Dong P, Xu J et al (2016) Surface tension components based selection of cosolvent for efficient liquid phase exfoliation of 2D materials. Small 12:2741–2749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arao Y, Mori F, Kubouchi M (2017) Efficient solvent systems for improving production of few-layer graphene in liquid phase exfoliation. Carbon 118:18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paton KR, Varrla E, Backes C, Smith RJ, Khan U, O’Neill A et al (2014) Scalable production of large quantities of defect-free few-layer graphene by shear exfoliation in liquids. Nat Mater 13:624–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Arao Y, Mizuno Y, Araki K, Kubouchi M (2016) Mass production of high-aspect-ratio few-layer graphene by high-speed laminar flow. Carbon 102:330–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Karagiannidis PG, Hodge SA, Lombardi L, Tomarchio F, Decorde N et al (2017) Microfluidization of graphite and formulation of graphene-based conductive inks. ACS Nano 11:2742–2755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Iwashita N, Park CR, Fujimoto H, Shiraishi M, Inagaki M (2004) Specification for a standard procedure of X-ray diffraction measurements on carbon materials. Carbon 42:701–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aso H, Matsuoka K, Sharma A, Tomita A (2004) Structural analysis of PVC PFA carbons prepared at 500–1000°C based on elemental composition, XRD, and HRTEM. Carbon 42:2963–2973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Podila R, Anand B, Spear JT, Puneet P, Philip R et al (2012) Effects of disorder on the optical properties of CVD grown polycrystalline graphene. Nanoscale 4:1770–1775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yu Q, Jauregui LA, Wu W, Colby R, Tian J et al (2011) Control and characterization of individual grains and grain boundaries in graphene grown by chemical vapor deposition. Nat Mater 10:443–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bandenhorst H (2014) Microstructure of natural graphite flakes revealed by oxidation: limitations of XRD and Raman techniques for crystallinity estimates. Carbon 66:674–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dimiev AM, Tour JM (2014) Mechanism of graphene oxide formation. ACS Nano 8:3060–3068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bacon GE (1951) The interlayer spacing of graphite. Acta Cryst 4:558–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Feng H, Cheng R, Zhao X, Duan X, Li J (2013) A low-temperature method to produce highly reduced graphene oxide. Nat Commun 4:1539.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2555 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khan U, O’Neill A, Lotya M, De S, Coleman JN (2010) High-concentration solvent exfoliation of graphene. Small 6:864–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Khan U, O’Neill A, Porwal H, May P, Nawaz K, Coleman JN (2012) Size selection of dispersed, exfoliated graphene flakes by controlled centrifugation. Carbon 50:470–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bonaccorso F, Bartolotta A, Coleman JN, Backes C (2016) 2D-crystal-based functional inks. Adv Mater 28:6136–6166CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials and Chemical TechnologyTokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations