Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 17, pp 12167–12177 | Cite as

Nacre-inspired lightweight and high-strength AZ91D/Mg2B2O5w composites prepared by ice templating and pressureless infiltration

  • Hai-Rong Mao
  • Ping Shen
  • Yu-Hua Liu
  • Yu-Guang Zhao
  • Qi-Chuan Jiang


We developed a facile and low-cost approach to prepare lightweight and high-strength magnesium–matrix composites with a nacre-inspired laminated structure. First, lamellar Mg2B2O5 whisker (Mg2B2O5w) scaffolds with initial solid loadings of 10, 15 and 20 vol% were prepared by ice templating. The wettability between a molten AZ91D alloy and the Mg2B2O5w scaffold was greatly improved by the incorporation of nano-SiO2 sol in the aqueous slurry, making the preparation of nacre-mimetic AZ91D/Mg2B2O5w composite by way of pressureless infiltration feasible. The SiO2 content in the Mg2B2O5w scaffold has a significant effect on the processing and the microstructure and properties of the composites. The optimum SiO2 content was about 6–8 wt% of the total ceramic loading. A lower SiO2 content resulted in incomplete infiltration, while a higher content led to the formation of a large quantity of Mg2Si in the composite. The flexural strength of the composites seemed independent of the initial ceramic loading (10–20 vol%), whereas the compressive strength and elastic modulus increased considerably and the crack-growth fracture toughness decreased with increasing ceramic content. The mechanism for such variations was addressed.



This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51571099), the National Key R&D Plan (No. 2017YFB0703101) and the Changbai Mountain Scholars Program of Jilin Province (No. 2015011).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.


  1. 1.
    Miracle DB (2005) Metal matrix composites–From science to technological significance. Compos. Sci. Technol. 65:2526–2540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chawla N, Chawla KK (2006) Metal-matrix composites in ground transportation. JOM 58:67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen SH, Zhang DF, Sun G (2014) In situ synthesis of porous ceramics with a framework structure of magnesium borate whiskers. Mater Lett 121:206–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zeng Y, Yang HB, Fu WY, Qiao L, Chang LX, Chen JJ, Zhu HY, Li MH, Zou GT (2008) Synthesis of magnesium borate (Mg2B2O5) nanowires, growth mechanism and their lubricating properties. Mater Res Bull 43:2239–2247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mo ZJ, Chen JP, Lin J, Fan Y, Liang CY, Wang HS, Xu XW, Hu L, Tang CC (2014) Controllable synthesis of high aspect ratio Mg2B2O5 nanowires and their applications in reinforced polyhydroxyalkanoate composites. Chin Phys B 23:056201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhu YP, Jin PP, Zhao PT, Wang JH, Han L, Fei WD (2013) Hot deformation behavior of Mg2B2O5 whiskers reinforced AZ31B magnesium composite fabricated by stir-casting. Mater Sci Eng A 573:148–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li JG, Wang FF, Weng W, Zhang YJ, Wang ML, Wang HW (2012) Characteristic and mechanical properties of magnesium matrix composites reinforced with Mg2B2O5w and B4Cp. Mater Des 37:533–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jin PP, Han L, Chen SH, Wang JH, Zhu YP (2012) Microstructure and tensile properties of ZnO-coated magnesium borate whisker reinforced AZ31B composite. Mater Sci Eng A 554:48–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen SH, Jin PP, Schumacher G, Wanderka N (2010) Microstructure and interface characterization of a cast Mg2B2O5 whisker reinforced AZ91D magnesium alloy composite. Compos Sci Technol 70:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sun JY, Bhushan B (2012) Hierarchical structure and mechanical properties of nacre: a review. RSC Adv 2:7617–7632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deville S, Saiz E, Nalla RK, Tomsia AP (2006) Freezing as a path to build complex composites. Science 311:515–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu Q, Ye F, Gao Y, Liu SC, Yang HX, Zhou ZQ (2014) Fabrication of a new SiC/2024Al co-continuous composite with lamellar microstructure and high mechanical properties. J Alloys Compd 585:146–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang H, Shen P, Alateng SG, Guo RF, Jiang QC (2016) Preparation of nacre-like composites by reactive infiltration of a magnesium alloy into porous silicon carbide derived from ice template. Mater Lett 183:299–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shi LX, Shen P, Zhang D, Dong ET, Jiang QC (2013) Reactive wetting in liquid magnesium/silica and magnesium/silicon systems. Appl Surf Sci 274:124–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kumar SS, Bai VS, Rajkumar KV, Sharma GK, Jayakumar T, Rajasekharan T (2009) Elastic modulus of Al–Si/SiC metal matrix composites as a function of volume fraction. J Phys D Appl Phys 42:175504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shaga A, Shen P, Sun C, Jiang QC (2015) Lamellar-interpenetrated Al–Si–Mg/SiC composites fabricated by freeze casting and pressureless infiltration. Mater Sci Eng A 630:78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Launey ME, Munch E, Alsem DH, Saiz E, Tomsia AP, Ritchie RO (2010) A novel biomimetic approach to the design of high-performance ceramic–metal composites. J R Soc Interface 7:741–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gao HL, Chen SM, Mao LB, Song ZQ, Yao HB, Cölfen H, Luo XS, Zhang F, Pan Z, Meng YF, Ni Y, Yu SH (2017) Mass production of bulk artificial nacre with excellent mechanical properties. Nat. Commun 8(1):287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Deville S, Maire E, Bernard-Granger G, Lasalle A, Bogner A, Gauthier C, Leloup J, Guizard C (2009) Metastable and unstable cellular solidification of colloidal suspensions. Nat Mater 8:966–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barthelat F, Espinosa HD (2007) An experimental investigation of deformation and fracture of nacre–mother of pearl. Exp Mech 47:311–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nardone VC (1987) Assessment of models used to predict the strength of discontinuous silicon carbide reinforced aluminum alloys. Scr Metall Mater 21:1313–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Clegg WJ (1988) A stress analysis of the tensile deformation of metal matrix composites. Acta Metall 36:2141–2419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schmidt RD, Case ED, Giles J, Ni JE, Hogan TP (2012) Room-temperature mechanical properties and slow crack growth behavior of Mg2Si thermoelectric materials. J Electron Mater 41:1210–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roy S, Wanner A (2008) Metal/ceramic composites from freeze-cast ceramic preforms: domain structure and elastic properties. Compos Sci Technol 68:1136–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Automobile Materials (Ministry of Education), Department of Materials Science and EngineeringJilin UniversityChangchunPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations