Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 17, pp 12334–12351 | Cite as

Curly hard carbon derived from pistachio shells as high-performance anode materials for sodium-ion batteries

Energy materials
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) have drawn more attention to serve as one of the promising energy storage devices owing to the abundance of sodium resources and similar characters with lithium element. Hard carbon materials derived from biomass or biomass waste have been considered to act as candidate anode materials for SIBs. In this paper, we have successfully prepared curly hard carbon materials using pistachio shells as biomass template via a two-step approach including hydrothermal treatment and following a pyrolysis process at various temperatures. Physical properties of pistachio shell-derived hard carbons (PSHCs) including microstructure, morphology and pore size distribution are evaluated by X-ray diffraction, Raman spectrum and N2 sorption analysis. The PSHCs carbonized at 1000 °C (PSHC-1000) with average micropores of 0.7398 nm and larger interlayer space of the (002) crystal plane deliver the highest reversible capacity of 317 mAh g−1 at 0.1C, also show the excellent long-term cycling and rate performances. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy technology is introduced to study the kinetics parameters during the first sodiation process of PSHC-1000 electrode, and also to compare the resistance of the charge transfer process for all the PSHCs. Results exhibit PSHC-1000 electrode with the symmetry factor of 0.1352 has the smallest charge transfer resistance, leading to more easily transportation of electrons and ions. This work can provide a simple and green route for preparation of hard carbon materials derived from biomass waste with unique morphology and microstructure which can exhibit an excellent electrochemical performance.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21606158, 21506141 and 21706171) and Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (Grant Nos. 2015021131 and 2016021040).

Supplementary material

10853_2018_2472_MOESM1_ESM.doc (661 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 661 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Luo W, Shen F, Bommier C, Zhu H, Ji X, Hu L (2016) Na-ion battery anodes: materials and electrochemistry. Acc Chem Res 49:231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dunn B, Kamath H, Tarascon JM (2011) Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices. Science 334:928–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Larcher D, Tarascon JM (2015) Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage. Nat Chem 7:19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim H, Kim H, Ding Z, Lee MH, Lim K, Yoon G, Kang K (2016) Recent progress in electrode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Adv Energy Mater 6:1600943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang W, Li W, Wang S, Miao Z, Liu HK, Chou S (2018) Structural design of anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 6:6183–6205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thomas P, Ghanbaja J, Billaud D (1999) Electrochemical insertion of sodium in pitch-based carbon fibers in comparison with graphite in NaClO4-ethylene carbonate electrolyte. Electrochim Acta 45:423–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hou H, Qiu X, Wei W, Zhang Y, Ji X (2017) Carbon anode materials for advanced sodium-ion batteries. Adv Energy Mater 7:1602898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jin J, Shi Z, Wang C (2014) Electrochemical performance of electrospun carbon nanofibers as free-standing and binder-free anodes for sodium-ion and lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 141:302–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lu P, Sun Y, Xiang H, Liang X, Yu Y (2017) 3D amorphous carbon with controlled porous and disordered structures as a high-rate anode material for sodium-ion batteries. Adv Energy Mater 7:1702434Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tang K, Fu L, White RJ, Yu L, Titirici M-M, Antonietti M, Maier J (2012) Hollow carbon nanospheres with superior rate capability for sodium-based batteries. Adv Energy Mater 2:873–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang J, Nie P, Ding B, Dong S, Hao X, Dou H, Zhang X (2017) Biomass derived carbon for energy storage devices. J Mater Chem A 5:2411–2428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tang W, Zhang Y, Zhong Y, Shen T, Wang X, Xia X, Tu J (2017) Natural biomass-derived carbons for electrochemical energy storage. Mater Res Bull 88:234–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gao Y, Zhai Z, Huang K, Zhang Y (2017) Energy storage applications of biomass-derived carbon materials: batteries and supercapacitors. New J Chem 41:11456–11470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Long W, Fang B, Ignaszak A, Wu Z, Wang Y, Wilkinson D (2017) Biomass-derived nanostructured carbons and their composites as anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Chem Soc Rev 46:7176–7190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jiang L, Sheng L, Fan Z (2018) Biomass-derived carbon materials with structural diversities and their applications in energy storage. Sci China Mater 61:133–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kalyani P, Anitha A (2013) Biomass carbon & its prospects in electrochemical energy systems. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:4034–4045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yan L, Yu J, Houston J, Flores N, Luo H (2017) Biomass derived porous nitrogen doped carbon for electrochemical devices. Green Energy Environ 2:84–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dahbi M, Kiso M, Kubota K, Horiba T, Chafik T, Hida K, Matsuyama T, Komab S (2017) Synthesis of hard carbon from argan shells for Na-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 5:9917–9928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zheng Y, Wang Y, Lu Y, Hu Y, Li J (2017) A high-performance sodium-ion battery enhanced by macadamia shell derived hard carbon anode. Nano Energy 39:489–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dou X, Hasa I, Hekmatfar M, Diemant T, Behm RJ, Buchholz D, Passerini S (2017) Pectin, hemicellulose, or lignin? Impact of the biowaste source on the performance of hard carbons for sodium-ion batteries. ChemSusChem 10:2668–2676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lv W, Wen F, Xiang J, Zhao J, Li L, Wang L, Liu Z, Tian Y (2015) Peanut shell derived hard carbon as ultralong cycling anodes for lithium and sodium batteries. Electrochim Acta 176:533–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim K, Lim DG, Han CW, Osswald S, Ortalan V, Youngblood JP, Pol VG (2017) Tailored carbon anodes derived from biomass for sodium-ion storage. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:8720–8728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lotfabad EM, Ding J, Cui K, Kohandehghan A, Kalisvaart WP, Hazelton M, Mitlin D (2014) High-density sodium and lithium ion battery anodes from banana peels. ACS Nano 8:7115–7129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xiang J, Lv W, Mu C, Zhao J, Wang B (2017) Activated hard carbon from orange peel for lithium/sodium ion battery anode with long cycle life. J Alloy Compd 701:870–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim NR, Yun YS, Song MY, Hong SJ, Kang M, Leal C, Park YW, Jin H (2016) Citrus-peel-derived, nanoporous carbon nanosheets containing redox-active heteroatoms for sodium-ion storage. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:3175–3181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhu Z, Liang F, Zhou Z, Zeng X, Wang D, Dong P, Zhao J, Sun S, Zhang Y, Li X (2018) Expanded biomass-derived hard carbon with ultrastable performance in sodium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 6:1513–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang C, Huang J, Qi H, Cao L, Xu Z, Cheng Y, Zhao X, Li J (2017) Controlling pseudographtic domain dimension of dandelion derived biomass carbon for excellent sodium-ion storage. J Power Sources 358:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang T, Mao J, Liu X, Xuan M, Bi K, Zhang XL, Hu J, Fan J, Chen S, Shao G (2017) Pinecone biomass-derived hard carbon anodes for high-performance sodium-ion batteries. RSC Adv 7:41504–41511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yan D, Yu C, Zhang X, Qin W, Lu T, Hu B, Li H, Pan L (2016) Nitrogen-doped carbon microspheres derived from oatmeal as high capacity and superior long life anode material for sodium ion battery. Electrochim Acta 191:385–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Qin D, Chen S (2017) A sustainable synthesis of biomass carbon sheets as excellent performance sodium ion batteries anode. J Solid State Electrochem 21:1305–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liu P, Li Y, Hu Y, Li H, Chen L, Huang X (2016) A waste biomass derived hard carbon as a high-performance anode material for sodium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 4:13046–13052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yang T, Qian T, Wang M, Shen X, Xu N, Sun Z, Yan C (2016) A sustainable route from biomass byproduct okara to high content nitrogen-doped carbon sheets for efficient sodium ion batteries. Adv Mater 28:539–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Li Y, Hu Y, Titirici M, Chen L, Huang X (2016) Hard carbon microtubes made from renewable cotton as high-performance anode material for sodium-ion batteries. Adv Energy Mater 6:1600659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Elizabeth I, Singh BP, Trikha S, Gopukumar S (2016) Bio-derived hierarchically macro-meso-micro porous carbon anode for lithium/sodium ion batteries. J Power Sources 329:412–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ou J, Yang L, Zhang Z, Xi X (2017) Nitrogen-doped porous carbon derived from horn as an advanced anode material for sodium ion batteries. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 237:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shen F, Luo W, Dai J, Yao Y, Zhu M, Hitz E, Tang Y, Chen Y, Sprenkle VL, Li X, Hu L (2016) Ultra-thick, low-tortuosity, and mesoporous wood carbon anode for high-performance sodium-ion batteries. Adv Energy Mater 6:1600377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Guo L, An Y, Fei H, Feng J, Xiong S, Ci L (2017) Self-templated biomass-derived nitrogen-doped porous carbons as high performance anodes for sodium ion batteries. Mater Technol 32:592–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sharma N, Gawli Y, Ahmad A, Muhammed M, Ogale S (2017) Nanotubular hard carbon derived from renewable natural seed gel for high performance sodium-ion battery anode. ChemistrySelect 2:6909–6915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Acikalin K, Karaca F, Bolat E (2012) Pyrolysis of pistachio shell: effects of pyrolysis conditions and analysis of products. Fuel 95:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hu C-C, Wang C-C, Wu F-C, Tseng R-L (2007) Characterization of pistachio shell-derived carbons activated by a combination of KOH and CO2 for electric double-layer capacitors. Electrochim Acta 52:2498–2505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kamandari H, Rafsanjani HH, Najjarzadeh H, Eksiri Z (2015) Influence of process variables on chemically activated carbon from pistachio shell with ZnCl2 and KOH. Res Chem Intermed 41:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lua AC, Yang T (2005) Characteristics of activated carbon prepared from pistachio-nut shell by zinc chloride activation under nitrogen and vacuum conditions. J Colloid Interface Sci 290:505–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dolas H, Sahin O, Saka C, Demir H (2011) A new method on producing high surface area activated carbon: the effect of salt on the surface area and the pore size distribution of activated carbon prepared from pistachio shell. Chem Eng J 166:191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Xu J, Gao Q, Zhang Y, Tan Y, Tian W, Zhu L, Jiang L (2014) Preparing two-dimensional microporous carbon from pistachio nutshell with high areal capacitance as supercapacitor materials. Sci Rep 4:5545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hassan AF, Youssef AM, Priecel P (2013) Removal of deltamethrin insecticide over highly porous activated carbon prepared from pistachio nutshells. Carbon Lett 14:234–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Noman M, Sanginario A, Jagadale P, Tagliaferro A, Demarchi D (2015) Activated carbonized pistachio nut shells for electrochemiluminescence detection. J Appl Electrochem 45:585–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hong K, Qie L, Zeng R, Yi Z, Zhang W, Wang D, Yin W, Wu C, Fan Q, Zhang W, Huang Y (2014) Biomass derived hard carbon used as a high performance anode material for sodium ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 2:12733–12738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Acikalin K (2012) Pyrolytic characteristics and kinetics of pistachio shell by thermogravimetric analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim 109:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Cançado LG, Takai K, Enok T, Endo M, Kim YA, Mizusaki H, Jorio A, Coelho LN, Magalhães-Paniago R, Pimenta MA (2006) General equation for the determination of the crystallite size La of nanographite by Raman spectroscopy. Appl Phys Lett 88:163106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jiang J, Zhu J, Ai W, Fan Z, Shen X, Zou C, Liu J, Zhang H, Yu T (2014) Evolution of disposable bamboo chopsticks into uniform carbon fibers: a smart strategy to fabricate sustainable anodes for Li-ion batteries. Energy Environ Sci 7:2670–2679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hasegawa G, Kanamori K, Kannari N, Ozaki J, Nakanishi K, Abe T (2016) Studies on electrochemical sodium storage into hard carbons with binder-free monolithic electrodes. J Power Sources 318:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zhu Y, Chen M, Li Q, Yuan C, Wang C (2017) High-yield humic acid-based hard carbons as promising anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Carbon 123:727–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sun N, Li H, Xu B (2015) Facile synthesis of high performance hard carbon anode materials for sodium ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 3:20560–20566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ding J, Wang H, Li Z, Kohandehghan A, Cui K, Xu Z, Zahiri B, Tan X, Lotfabad EM, Olsen BC, Mitlin D (2013) Carbon nanosheet frameworks derived from peat moss as high performance sodium ion battery anodes. ACS Nano 7:11004–11015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Xu S-D, Zhuang Q-C, Tian L-L, Qin Y-P, Fang L, Sun S-G (2011) Impedance spectra of nonhomogeneous, multilayered porous composite graphite electrodes for Li-ion batteries: experimental and theoretical studies. J Phys Chem C 115:9210–9219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bard AJ, Faulkner LR (2001) Electrochemical methods: fundamentals and applications, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zhou X, Guo Y-G (2014) Highly disordered carbon as a superior anode material for room-temperature sodium-ion batteries. ChemElectroChem 1:83–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Xu S-D, Zhuang Q-C, Wang J, Xu Y, Zhu Y (2013) New insight on vinylethylene carbonate as a film forming additive to ethylene carbonate-based electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries. Int J Electrochem Sci 8:8058–8076Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zhang Y, Chen L, Meng Y, Xie J, Guo Y, Xiao D (2016) Lithium and sodium storage in highly ordered mesoporous nitrogen-doped carbons derived from honey. J Power Sources 335:20–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Yuan DD, Wang YX, Cao YL, Ai XP, Yang HX (2015) Improved electrochemical performance of Fe-substituted NaNi0.5Mn0.5O2 cathode materials for sodium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:8585–8591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wang P-F, You Y, Yin Y-X, Guo Y-G (2016) An O3-type NaNi0.5Mn0.5O2 cathode for sodium-ion batteries with improved rate performance and cycling stability. J Mater Chem A 4:17660–17664CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringTaiyuan University of TechnologyTaiyuanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Collaborative Innovation Center of Green Energy Materials and Energy Storage SystemsTaiyuan University of TechnologyTaiyuanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations